Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IPBYPASS

2002-01-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
>The docs don't indicate how to add the additional IP addresses to IPBYPASS. >Is there a separator character or carriage returns. You can only have one IP address per IPBYPASS line, but you can have multiple lines, like this: IPBYPASS192.168.100.1 IPBYPASS10.1

[Declude.JunkMail] IPBYPASS

2002-01-04 Thread David Stavert
The docs don't indicate how to add the additional IP addresses to IPBYPASS. Is there a separator character or carriage returns. David --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Just a heads up, spelling error :)

2002-01-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
>There s a spelling error in the virus.cfg file from you site. > >LOGFILE had C:\Imali&&.. J Thanks -- it's fixed now. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing li

[Declude.JunkMail] Just a heads up, spelling error :)

2002-01-04 Thread Malcolm Kynoch
Hi Scott,   There’s a spelling error in the virus.cfg file from you site.   LOGFILE  had C:\Imali…….. J   Regards,     Mal

NOABUSE:Re: Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists

2002-01-04 Thread Mike Nice
Andy, I have a very few false positives for SPAMROUTING; less than .01%, but it depends on who your users communicate with. The false positives come from business communication with multinational corporations. - Original Message - From: "andyb@thumpernet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rog

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Relay

2002-01-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Sorry, I mis-read the docs. Is there an archive of the list. Yes, you can go to http://www.mail-archive.com to find the archives. >I was going to run this on a test machine internally so I could start to >understand all the settings but I am guessing that the activation code won't >allow that.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Relay

2002-01-04 Thread David Stavert
Scott Sorry, I mis-read the docs. Is there an archive of the list. I was going to run this on a test machine internally so I could start to understand all the settings but I am guessing that the activation code won't allow that. So . . . if I use the settings as they are I should only see a warni

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sugestions on creating and feeding a spamtrap mailbox.

2002-01-04 Thread Todd Holt
Title: Message Just buy something online and give this email address on the form.  There is not a company on the planet that wouldn't sell your soul to make a buck!!   P.S. Be sure to select the opt-out option.  That will ensure they notice you!  :-)) -Original Message-From: [

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sugestions on creating and feeding aspamtrap mailbox.

2002-01-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
>I've created a mailbox to serve as a spamtrap to collect examples >etc. What are some of the more effective ways to get it noticed? I 've >have some success after posting once to some newsgroups. At this time I'm >looking mainly for the body text. It's not as easy as it sounds. The two

[Declude.JunkMail] Sugestions on creating and feeding a spamtrap mailbox.

2002-01-04 Thread Malcolm Kynoch
Title: Message Hi Guys,   I've created a mailbox to serve as a spamtrap to collect examples etc.  What are some of the more effective ways to get it noticed?   I 've have some success after posting once to some newsgroups.  At this time I'm looking mainly for the body text.   Any sugestion

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Relay

2002-01-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
>We relay mail for a couple of Exchange servers. Is it possible to do any per >domain or per user configuration for non local domains? Yes, you can do that, following the same procedure as you would for local domains/users. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for vi

[Declude.JunkMail] Relay

2002-01-04 Thread David Stavert
Scott We relay mail for a couple of Exchange servers. Is it possible to do any per domain or per user configuration for non local domains? David Stavert Netraprise Systems, Inc. 79 13th Ave NE, Suite 112 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612.317.9065 612.317.9062 FAX --- [This E-mail was scanned for viru

Re[5]: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists

2002-01-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Thanks, Andy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thumpernet.com 315-282-0020 Friday, January 04, 2002, 12:04:59 PM, you wrote: RH> Reply to: andyb@thumpernet RH> Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists on Friday 10:53:25 AM RH> We do not take this approach. We made everything WARN

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists

2002-01-04 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: andyb@thumpernet Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists on Friday 10:53:25 AM We do not take this approach. We made everything WARN except WEIGHT10 which is HOLD. Then we give SpamCop a '9' weight. We make other weights to trigger the WEIGHT10 hold if more than SpamCop occurs. If on

Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists

2002-01-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I checked the headers, it was not pm0.net and I checked with the customers, they had indeed signed up for these mailing lists. So, there were 3 false positives this morning out of 40 being held. I don't even bother to HOLD for SPAMROUTING and a couple of other tests as there didn't appear t

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists

2002-01-04 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: R. Scott Perry Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists on Friday 9:01:19 AM Be careful too... mail from @universalstudios.86server.pm0.com is not necessarily mail from Universal Studios... We see SpamCop as the most reliable, and we just use weighting to 'confirm' SpamCop and we re

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists

2002-01-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
>I finding SPAMCOP is catching listserv email that's not spam but lists >that people have signed up for like esavers and Universal Studios... The neat thing about the SPAMCOP test is that the information they supply (which is included in the warning added to the headers, and the log file) give

[Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists

2002-01-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I finding SPAMCOP is catching listserv email that's not spam but lists that people have signed up for like esavers and Universal Studios... I added them to the whitelist. SPAMCOP is a great test and a bad test at the same time. Thanks, Andy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thumperne