>The docs don't indicate how to add the additional IP addresses to IPBYPASS.
>Is there a separator character or carriage returns.
You can only have one IP address per IPBYPASS line, but you can have
multiple lines, like this:
IPBYPASS192.168.100.1
IPBYPASS10.1
The docs don't indicate how to add the additional IP addresses to IPBYPASS.
Is there a separator character or carriage returns.
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe
>There s a spelling error in the virus.cfg file from you site.
>
>LOGFILE had C:\Imali&&.. J
Thanks -- it's fixed now.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing li
Hi Scott,
There’s a spelling error in the virus.cfg
file from you site.
LOGFILE had C:\Imali……..
J
Regards,
Mal
Andy,
I have a very few false positives for SPAMROUTING; less than .01%, but it
depends on who your users communicate with. The false positives come from
business communication with multinational corporations.
- Original Message -
From: "andyb@thumpernet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rog
>Sorry, I mis-read the docs. Is there an archive of the list.
Yes, you can go to http://www.mail-archive.com to find the archives.
>I was going to run this on a test machine internally so I could start to
>understand all the settings but I am guessing that the activation code won't
>allow that.
Scott
Sorry, I mis-read the docs. Is there an archive of the list.
I was going to run this on a test machine internally so I could start to
understand all the settings but I am guessing that the activation code won't
allow that. So . . . if I use the settings as they are I should only see a
warni
Title: Message
Just
buy something online and give this email address on the form. There is not
a company on the planet that wouldn't sell your soul to make a
buck!!
P.S.
Be sure to select the opt-out option. That will ensure they notice
you! :-))
-Original Message-From:
[
>I've created a mailbox to serve as a spamtrap to collect examples
>etc. What are some of the more effective ways to get it noticed? I 've
>have some success after posting once to some newsgroups. At this time I'm
>looking mainly for the body text.
It's not as easy as it sounds.
The two
Title: Message
Hi
Guys,
I've created a
mailbox to serve as a spamtrap to collect examples etc. What are some of
the more effective ways to get it noticed? I 've have some
success after posting once to some newsgroups. At this time I'm looking
mainly for the body text.
Any
sugestion
>We relay mail for a couple of Exchange servers. Is it possible to do any per
>domain or per user configuration for non local domains?
Yes, you can do that, following the same procedure as you would for local
domains/users.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for vi
Scott
We relay mail for a couple of Exchange servers. Is it possible to do any per
domain or per user configuration for non local domains?
David Stavert
Netraprise Systems, Inc.
79 13th Ave NE, Suite 112
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612.317.9065
612.317.9062 FAX
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viru
Hi,
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Friday, January 04, 2002, 12:04:59 PM, you wrote:
RH> Reply to: andyb@thumpernet
RH> Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists on Friday 10:53:25 AM
RH> We do not take this approach. We made everything WARN
Reply to: andyb@thumpernet
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists on Friday 10:53:25 AM
We do not take this approach. We made everything WARN except
WEIGHT10 which is HOLD. Then we give SpamCop a '9' weight.
We make other weights to trigger the WEIGHT10 hold if more
than SpamCop occurs. If on
Hi,
I checked the headers, it was not pm0.net and I checked with the
customers, they had indeed signed up for these mailing lists.
So, there were 3 false positives this morning out of 40 being held. I
don't even bother to HOLD for SPAMROUTING and a couple of other tests as
there didn't appear t
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists on Friday 9:01:19 AM
Be careful too... mail from @universalstudios.86server.pm0.com
is not necessarily mail from Universal Studios...
We see SpamCop as the most reliable, and we just use weighting
to 'confirm' SpamCop and we re
>I finding SPAMCOP is catching listserv email that's not spam but lists
>that people have signed up for like esavers and Universal Studios...
The neat thing about the SPAMCOP test is that the information they supply
(which is included in the warning added to the headers, and the log file)
give
Hi,
I finding SPAMCOP is catching listserv email that's not spam but lists
that people have signed up for like esavers and Universal Studios...
I added them to the whitelist.
SPAMCOP is a great test and a bad test at the same time.
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumperne
18 matches
Mail list logo