Tom, what is the format for the filters?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List
I'm already doing this. I have a program on the
I think I saw this as somewhere else but never heard about it being
released or implemented:
System maintains a per-user whitelist of people that are allowed to send
email to that user
If an incoming mail is not on the whitelist, it is returned to the
sender automatically (the user never
We would like to have different limits on a per IP address basis.
This would partially solve the problem of having to whitelist an IP
address whenever a customer is using a NAT router and thus ends up with 10
or 20 workstations all sending out using a single IP and triggering the
HiJack
I have to agree that this could be one of the most powerful tools yet to
fight SPAM. I would pay money for this even if it were a seperate product!
A couple of questions about the implementation:
1- If the sender does not acknowledge the confirm request, do they go onto
the blacklist? This
Thanks and I want to push for this product!!
Ditto. Add to the requested feature list the ability to opt out entire
domains in Declude Std, as well as individual accts at the Pro level.
--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
http://mysecretbase.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
I think that is already available in the Pro version.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enhancements - unknown sender must reply
to ack
Thanks and I want to push
I meant have those options for the new, presently unavailable feature we
were talking about: a whitelist/confirmation receipt method (deleted the
msgs so I can't look up correct terminology ;D).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill
http://msn.com.com/2100-1105-916931.html
Maybe finally a real usable law might come out of that one... One can
always hope..
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
I meant have those options for the new, presently unavailable feature we
were talking about: a whitelist/confirmation receipt method (deleted the
msgs so I can't look up correct terminology ;D).
If added, the confirmation feature would likely be another action, so it
could be used on a
A product that does just this is spambar.
Gets very enoying when someone on a mailing list starts use it and you
write to the list and you have to ack your message to this person.
Then someone else sees it start using it. ugh.
Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 08:22:33 AM, you wrote:
TH I have to agree
That would work very well for us! If the confirmation request comes back
OK, could they be automatically added to the whitelist?
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL
That would work very well for us! If the confirmation request comes back
OK, could they be automatically added to the whitelist?
Yes, I expect that they would automatically get whitelisted (so they don't
have to go through the confirmation again).
-Scott
---
[This
I've been following this thread pretty close and can say that it is a
feature that would greatly enhance Declude Junkmail. I have a friend who
wrote his own email client about 3 years ago, he implemented this exact same
functionality and it has worked extremely well for years. Blocks spam, good
Scott, are the ip4r tests run sequentially or all ip4r databases queried at
the same time? The reason I'm asking is because I'm wondering if we will
see a performance difference between querying 5 ip4r databases versus 20
ip4r databases in our spam tests. I'm hoping that they are simultaneously
Great, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Timing question
Scott, are the ip4r tests run sequentially or all ip4r databases queried at
the same time? The
1 - Do I have to restart SMTP after editing kill.lst? Declude doesn't appear
to have this requirement.
The Declude blacklist would seem easier to work with if the answer is yes.
Does kill.lst allow comments like Declude blacklist?
Which one is more efficient?
Which one is more
1 - Do I have to restart SMTP after editing kill.lst? Declude doesn't appear
to have this requirement.
The Declude blacklist would seem easier to work with if the
answer is yes.
I don't know for sure if you need to stop/restart the SMTP service after
changing the kill.lst (but I
17 matches
Mail list logo
