RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate vs. Message Sniffer...opinions?

2003-08-21 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I don't want to knock Alligate, it has some nice functionality, especially when used without Declude (auto whitelisting and digest notification), and it does what it says, but it has a relatively high false positive rate in the default configuration and therefore it can't be scored higher

RE : [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate vs. Message Sniffer...opinions?

2003-08-21 Thread mail-list
Hi, Message sniffer is not so bad as I tested it but have a big problem with News letter it has a bif False positive rate with them. Regards Mehdi Blagui -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Matthew Bramble Envoyé : jeudi 21 août 2003 03:32

[Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Dan Patnode
I'm running twin dual Xeon 2.4s and was nearly wiped out today by all the extra virus/worm activity. Its midnight and I'm still clearing out the overflow, to the tune of 2 dozen Declude processes. Rather than running them in parallel as we had before (setting them up with the same MX weight),

[Declude.JunkMail] Does this exist in junkmail

2003-08-21 Thread mail-list
Hi, I'm trying actually to trigger some action in case of combination of failed test not only on Weight. For example if Weight 15 and the test fail Filter.txt test wich is done against keyword or a test like sniffer, we want then to delete the email of hold it! In other case the delete action

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
Dan, Declude does not have that kind of power as it is the IMAIL SMTP Daemon which accepts the mail and places it into the spool. After it is in the spool declude queue moves it to the overflow for faster processing if there are more messages in the spool than imail can run smtp-delivery

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does this exist in junkmail

2003-08-21 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
That is not possible at this time with Declude, and has been discussed. Some other tests maybe be looking at the ability to do that. However, while the concept is interesting, your example has the potential to delete legits. The reason is taking action based on blacklisted keywords can be

[Declude.JunkMail] Daily humor...

2003-08-21 Thread Bill Landry
Check-out this obfuscation technique: ;-) -E---y---P---G -n---o---e---u -l---u---n---a -a---r---i---r -r---s---a -g---n -e---t -e -e -d Bill --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
LOL! that's peanuts.. try 70,000 ...yes 70,000 per hour and then tell me about being nailed ... and i didn't have a powerhouse like you...only a 400mhz p2 in otherwords 2.5 million in 24 hours. Sheldon - Original Message - From: Tom Baker|Netsmith Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: RE : [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate vs. Message Sniffer...opinions?

2003-08-21 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Message sniffer is not so bad as I tested it but have a big problem with News letter it has a bif False positive rate with them. On the home page for MessageSniffer you'll find a Help (QA) section which is worth your time to read if it's worth your time to implement. Submit false positives to:

RE: RE : [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate vs. Message Sniffer...opinions?

2003-08-21 Thread Pete (Madscientist)
Please forward a copy of the newsletter to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as an attachment and I will adjust the rule base (if appropriate). This is a service we provide by default to each subscriber, but we also - in general - code the core rule base to avoid false positives whenever we hear about them

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Wow, I thought my increase in messages from 5,800 messages inbound to 10,000 was a lot. BTW, my old mail server (PII @ 333 MHz, data on a SCSI2 mirror) with the same volume would regularly run mid-morning (my peak volume) with a 30 to 100 messages in the overflow folder. The new server (PIII @

[Declude.JunkMail] Sobig Assault

2003-08-21 Thread Malcolm Kynoch
Hi, Many of our users are getting plowed by Sobig, Declude and Fprot do there job well, but the users mailbox is getting clogged with the notices of detection. Is there a way to turn off notices for a particular virus? For now I've removed the mail templates. Any ideas? --- [This E-mail was

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sobig Assault

2003-08-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
Many of our users are getting plowed by Sobig, Declude and Fprot do there job well, but the users mailbox is getting clogged with the notices of detection. Is there a way to turn off notices for a particular virus? For now I've removed the mail templates. Add a line SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Sobig to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sobig Assault

2003-08-21 Thread Greg Foulks
I've removed my notice .eml template to users... I've found that they really don't want to see them at all. As far as they are concerned if it's been blocked why should they care. Greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Kynoch Sent:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Matthew Bramble
We have a little less volume than you do, but it's amazing how concentrated the messages can be. My personal account which has many domains pointed at it has not received a single copy of the virus, but one account on our server has been hit over 500 times in the last 48 hours. We run Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have a little less volume than you do, but it's amazing how concentrated the messages can be. My personal account which has many domains pointed at it has not received a single copy of the virus, but one account on our server has been hit over 500 times in the last 48 hours. We run

[Declude.JunkMail] Delete based on specified content

2003-08-21 Thread Peter Lent
Hi All, Can I use Junkmail to delete incoming emails that are bounces from Postmaster, etc? THANKS Peter --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Delete based on specified content

2003-08-21 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Well, you shouldn't... here is a cleaned up version of the JunkMail Pro filter file I started using last night. My global.cfg has: BADNOTIFY filter D:\IMail\Declude\BadNotify.txt x 0 0 and BADNOTIFY HOLD If you want BADNOTIFY to show up in your Total weight = lines in your decMMDD.log file,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sobig Assault

2003-08-21 Thread Matt Robertson
Greg wrote I've found that they really don't want to see them at all. I get that a lot myself. However the notices also tell them my value-added service is diligently doing its job. If I don't remind them why they're paying me, they might forget :D With that said, enough is enough.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Delete based on specified content

2003-08-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can I use Junkmail to delete incoming emails that are bounces from Postmaster, etc? Actually, to do that, you can use the IMail SMTP Refuse NULL Senders option (which has the added benefit that it will not use up bandwidth for the bounce message). But it is not recommended -- doing so will

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Delete based on specified content

2003-08-21 Thread Matthew Bramble
Here's what I do. I send outside notifications by way of [EMAIL PROTECTED], and then I use IMail rules to delete any replies. The text of the message says to reply to our postmaster address and that replies to bouncer will be automatically deleted. The rule.ima file takes care of it with

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Daily humor.../ obfuscation techniques

2003-08-21 Thread George Kulman
Rusty, Since they're all trying to get your money, they always have a URL or phone number, possibly obfuscated, which you can block with a filter if you have the PRO Version. I think that this is my fastest growing filter file. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]