Title: Message
Oh
Oh...
Interesting... I
sure will.
So I am imagining
things... has happened before. I will try to add up the weights and see -
I will review the archives now..
so perhaps that
explains why the headers show up at the bottom of the header and not at the top
like the
X-Outbound Test-Failures: IPNOTINMX, FILTER-WHITE
X-Outbound Test-Weight: -30
X-Note: Intended recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from mail.moragg.com ([62.219.165.29]).
X-Note: This E-mail has been scanned for spam and viruses.
X-Note: Please send abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return Receipt
Your [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.75 bogs down the server
document
:
I've got about 2 1/2 days of SORBS stats done, checking all but
SORBS-BLOCK (because I don't believe the methodology relates to spam).
The results are very telling.
SORBS
---
4377 - Unique Incoming Messages
1350 - Test Hits (30.8% of unique messages, multiple
Scott,
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
Joe Trimboli
System Administrator
CyberLink, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 4:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
I have customers here in the building that host domains with us that
come visit me when there is a fifteen minute delay in their email since
there are deals with tens of thousands of dollars relying on the speed
of email, too late and someone else has the deal. Unless you know about
their
I am having a whitelistfile problem with a mailing list. There are the odd
messages which get caught in our regular tests and I need to whitelist the
address. The X-Declude-Sender: line is as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
where the second set of numbers change for each message. I don't know about
I am having a whitelistfile problem with a mailing list. There are the odd
messages which get caught in our regular tests and I need to whitelist the
address. The X-Declude-Sender: line is as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
where the second set of numbers change for each message. I don't know about
Why not just whitelist @returns.groups.yahoo.com or even just
groups.yahoo.com? You don't need to match the whole line, just a part
of it.
You might also be failing yahoo.com E-mail accounts, and if so, you
might want to reduce the scoring of the blocklist that is catching this
domain. Some
Thanks. I guess there is a fairly low probability of seeing mainstream spam
from a mailing list, so I will use your suggestion.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2003 09:25
To: [EMAIL
I have a concern with messages to multiple recipients where the action
chosen by a single recipient is used on others.
In one case, a message was sent to nine recipients (eight in the Bcc) and
one of the Bcc recipients is signed up for our spam control, but another is
seeing the action, in this
is it possible to set a test for a specific domain ... rather
than using the whitelist (as I recall there is a limit to the number of
whitelist tests that can exist) so instead could I set up a test where the
domain could not fail? If yes what would it look like .. I am using the declude
I have a concern with messages to multiple recipients where the action
chosen by a single recipient is used on others.
Unfortunately, that's a problem inherent in SMTP, where a single E-mail can
be sent to multiple recipients -- and it's expected that the E-mail be
identical for all recipients.
Got this one today... how
polite. They claim I "subscribed" from IP 55.133.94.93 - assumingthat is
really the IP it came from, eitherwe shouldbe worried
aboutmilitary security or someone has some spare time on their hands and
is making extra money on the side.
Dear Customer,
Positive
is it possible to set a test for a specific domain ... rather than using
the whitelist (as I recall there is a limit to the number of whitelist
tests that can exist) so instead could I set up a test where the domain
could not fail? If yes what would it look like .. I am using the declude
Scott:
That would, in my view, be quite a serious problem for anyone using per-user
settings, and I hope you can find a way to deal with it.
I suppose the upside is that some customers will see the Subject add-on and
call and ask 'what's this?' giving us an opportunity to sell our spam
control
Title: Message
:)
That URL:
Specialoffers4you.com has been in our URL filter file since January 4,
2003. So they have been around for a while..
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Sean FaheySent: Monday, September 08,
We changed our handling because of this. We classify and rank using
weights, then add a formatted header, they then can use Imail rules or
client rules to handle as they wish. I also built a web app that will
modify their rules for them by providing a simple how aggressive do you
want to be and
I would actually think that this should be an configuration option in Imail,
where if you wanted to, each incoming message, if to more than one recipient
on the local server, would be separated.
In other words, if Imail received a message destined to 3 people on the
server, instead of creating
How does a subject that shows this.
=?ISO-8859-1?b?UmU6Q2hlYXBlc3QgVmlhZ3JhIEd1YXJhbnRlZWQ=?=
Display this.
Re:Cheapest Viagra Guaranteed
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
How does a subject that shows this.
=?ISO-8859-1?b?UmU6Q2hlYXBlc3QgVmlhZ3JhIEd1YXJhbnRlZWQ=?=
Display this.
Re:Cheapest Viagra Guaranteed
That's because the subject is encoded. To help support non-English
languages, there was an RFC that allowed subjects and message bodies to be
encoded.
How does a subject that shows this.
=?ISO-8859-1?b?UmU6Q2hlYXBlc3QgVmlhZ3JhIEd1YXJhbnRlZWQ=?=
The ?b? indicates that this subject line is Base64 encoded.
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
I've started getting strange results in an XINHEADER. Specifically, one that uses
REVDNS and
REMOTEIP. Enclosed is an example followed by the relevant snippet from config.cfg. I
can't figure
out the SENT from X-Note which has recently been sporadically showing gibberish, and
the first
line that
I've started getting strange results in an XINHEADER. Specifically, one
that uses REVDNS and
REMOTEIP. Enclosed is an example followed by the relevant snippet from
config.cfg. I can't figure
out the SENT from X-Note which has recently been sporadically showing
gibberish, and the first
line
Well, I'm using Outlook 2000, and the only thing at the level of my PC which might
influence the
headers is a piece of software which changes incoming HTML email into plain text. If
you think it'll
make a difference, I can try to retrieve one of these via IMail's Web Messaging,
before my local
Any suggestion on how to block these.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange Subject
How does a subject that shows this.
Well, I'm using Outlook 2000, and the only thing at the level of my PC
which might influence the
headers is a piece of software which changes incoming HTML email into
plain text. If you think it'll
make a difference, I can try to retrieve one of these via IMail's Web
Messaging, before my local
SUBJECT 40 CONTAINS =?ISO-8859-1?b?
Assuming you don't ever get emails from European countries, Canada or other
locations that use accented characters.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201
If you don't mind running a MX gateway or switching to a different one,
Xmail server (www.xmailserver.org) does split all messages into
individual recipients, I tested it. Downside is you will run declude
for every recipient which will increase server load. I would guess at
least a 5-10%
I believe the Outlook XP and 2003 mail config test uses the subject
encoding as well on the test message. Had acustomer with bad pop
settings leave several test on webmail and they looked like that.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use
a text filter and add something like:
SUBJECT 40 CONTAINS =?ISO-8859-1?b?
to it.
I tried this all the way down to ust ?b? and a SUBJECT filter didn't
catch it. The SUBJECT filter also doesn't catch the decoded text.
I found though that if you use the HEADERS filter, it
scott
is it possible for you to create a test that would use imail's
antispam-table-ini.txt ?
- Original Message -
From: Charles Frolick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:54 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange Subject
I believe the
32 matches
Mail list logo
