Hello,
we use it the same way, Imail 8 with Declude Antivirus and Antispam and
Popcon Pro from http://www.christensen-software.com/ to pop the Exchange
Accounts to our internal Exchange Server. (running on a VMWare Machine on
the internal network)
You will need all account three times
You will need all account three times (Imail/Popcon/Exchange) and
you will have another point of failure, but additionally another
virus scanner on Popcon (RAV Antivirus) :)
You would find my scripts much easier, as you only need to maintain
the Exchange (AD) address list, nothing
Does anyone have any simple software to analyze the imail logs and for a
domain give stats one number of mails in and out and a list of where mails
are coming from and going to?. I have a customer asking for these kind of
stats and I suspect there is something out there.
Would rather not spend a
You could look at DLAnalyzer which provides an easy way to generate
comprehensive reports on Declude Virus and Junkmail.
http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
Harry,
Imail has a log processor you can download from their utilities page -
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/helperapps.html#loganalysis
If your looking for a Declude Junkmail/Virus log processor than our software
can do that - http://www.invariantsystems.com
Hi,
I have the following entries in a domain specific WHITELISTFILE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
.
.
@autocontacter.com
Now I realize that the second one includes the first one but I got an
e-mail
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And it did not get recognized by the whitelist file. Now I am going to
Darin,
I do this same thing as well but I do not use the POP connector from
exchange, I just forward it on to them. Why would you want to have the
extra burden of holding onto the mail until the Exchange box pops it
down?
What am I missing here?
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
So you are forwarding to a separate domain?
i.e. you host example.net and they host example.com. You forward
example.net email to their example.com addresses?
The reason you create the domain in IMail and specify the actual email
accounts is to avoid the extra load from non-existent email
I have a customer that is PO'ed at us. We put the recipients of emails
into the headers of every email using Declude's %ALLRECIPS% variable.
This is so we can identify the people who incorrectly report us as
spammers to AOL just because we forward their mail for them. Since AOL
strips that out,
Title: Message
Hi,
I'm always seeking
to eliminate "double failures" for single facts to prevent false positives and
then "up" the weight for groups of tests that test the same
facts.
Several domains that
I used to have in SpamDomains (such as "Excite.com") are publishing
SPF.
I used
Dan, we do the same thing. Our terms of service, privacy page and contracts
state that we reveal BCC's in the headers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 4:17 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
We ran into a similar issue, though our customer was much easier to work
with. In our case, they simply asked about it, we explained why we were
doing it, and they understood but said that if they decided it was critical
they might need to move to another host.
While it's bit more painful to use
As far as the legal issues go, I would say there's equal responsibility on
his part to not assume that something he thought was confidential
actually is confidential, and on your part to inform him of the change
would reveal potentially sensitive information in the headers.
One would think that
Hi,
With liability disputes it often comes down to what the average reasonable
person might expect, whether the result was foreseeable and the damage
preventable. (Take it from a total layman, who has no business advising you
in any way.)
I would say, that most people who are familiar with the
Darrell,
Well, but if that protocol explicitly defines that something is NOT included
at all, in fact, the very purpose of the BCC feature being to EXCLUDE it
from transmission, then a plaintiff may be able to show a reasonable
assumption that this is in fact true. (Not that I know what I'm
Certainly true...but in the case of reasonable doubt grin, a good lawyer
could use that argument wellbut hopefully it won't come to that.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:00 AM
Subject:
Thanks to all who replied. We have decided to remove that line from the
headers and use the spoolname instead. More work for us, but the
customers are happy.
-Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, April 08,
Hello Darin,
Friday, April 8, 2005, 10:07:51 AM, you wrote:
DC Certainly true...but in the case of reasonable doubt grin, a good lawyer
DC could use that argument wellbut hopefully it won't come to that.
DC Darin.
Civil cases do not require 'beyond a reasonable doubt', only criminal.
--
And that would be why I'm not a lawyer...grin...but I didn't mean to imply
this was a guilt or innocence case...just that if the jury is trying to
determine a settlement, then a good argument that the plaintiff was
partially at fault for revealing the sensitive information would reduce or
possible
Well - I guess my point is that this is a legal matter, there is an argument
that could be made - so one cannot simply dismiss this without proper
consultation. And THIS list is NOT the right one to get proper consultation
on legalities.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
Nick, you bugged my office! There's no other way you could have been
privy to the exact conversation my boss had to (not with) me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:59 AM
To:
No it was not the last time. It was in the middle and the system@ was up
higher in the file. There was a CRLF after the last line.
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
I scan the mail for example.com and then pass it on to the IP address of
their example.com mail server. No POP for me.
I have not yet implemented Sandy's alias scripts although I have looked
at them. My problem with the scripts is that I have not had enough time
to look at them and figure out how
Back in the day, fetching mail for your enterprise via POP was viable.
It had everything to do with weak SMTP support and expensive dial on
demand style connectivity.
Now we have cheap pervasive broadband to the Internet and a heroin-like
dependency on email.
I didn't think anybody was still
See:
http://www.websensesecuritylabs.com/alerts/alert.php?AlertID=163
courtesy of today's entry at:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?date=2005-04-08
Going back through my logs, I see quite a few messages from zombie
machines that were held. The spam is pretty obvious, and I've been
getting them
Also make sure there is not a trailing space. I just had one in my
Whitelistfile this week.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:39 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE:
FYI, Sniffer also has some tests that are similar to SPAMDOMAINS that were
formerly causing me double-hits on false positives on my system. Pete has this
stuff seemingly coded up into a group and it can be turned off easily if you
request it from him.
Matt
-- Original Message
Exposing BCC information is something that I would never think about doing. I
have seen too many lists where people use CC's to distribute and then someone
else starts using that CC list for thier own purposes. Viruses also tend to
harvest from such things, and we haven't even touched on
... Another double-hit involving SPF would be to marry the logic of
IPNotInMX and SPF PASS/FAIL; if you have SPF records for the domain, you
don't need IPNotInMX.
Sorry, no working sample. Putting that into a Declude test has been on
my to-do-list for a long time.
Andrew 8)
-Original
Well, I spent a good portion of today experimenting with a Filter that could
combine Sniffer, invURIBL and NOLEGITCONTENT... However, it seems as if
NOLEGITCONTENT is never found in the TESTFAILED list?
From what I could see a TESTFAILED CONTAINS NOLEGITCONTENT is never true?
So - I wonder
Do you have it set to WARN or IGNORE?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tip: Eliminating SPF domains from
SpamDomains
Well, I spent a good portion of
Hm... Good point!
Not set to anything - just subtracting weight right now...
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, April 08,
Probably just need to set it to WARN to see it then.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tip: Eliminating SPF domains from
SpamDomains
Hm... Good point!
Sorry for the OT but it somewhat relates to this issue.
I have a customer that we have been hosting mail for who has set up their
own Exchange server. They asked me to point their MX record at their
exchange server but still want to use me for their lists. I'm running IMail
7.15.
I added an a
34 matches
Mail list logo
