We run a 25 ton mini-split in our computer room. It's the type where
the fans are in the upper part of the wall, and all the guts are
outside. Does a very good job. Raised flooring wasn't an option sadly.
Sam
Cris Porter wrote:
Can anyone recommend a portable air conditioner to
cool a
The Declude staff let me know that v3 won't work on WinNT, so I think I
can't delay the inevitable any longer.
Just for fun, has anyone tried the v3 beta with IMail6 on WinNT?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
John,
I have tried the Beta on NT4 it seemed to run ok the service etc worked. I
did not see any inherent problems, but then again this was not a detailed
test but rather I just wanted to see if it would run and it did.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Can the beta testers with dual-CPU machines confirm that the latest Beta
Built is now running without creating the previously reported backlog
problems?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Declude 3.0.4 Beta Notes
1.) Installation – Service installed with no issue. Proc and work
directory were created.
2.) Service stability – Service was very stable. Did not stop
unexpectantly. Service was stopped and restarted multiple times. No files
were left stranded in the work directory.
Hi Darrell - thanks for reporting back.
Okay, so my dual-processor system is still not compatible with the beta.
(I did not beta-test, since I don't have a single-processor machine.)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:35 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 3 Beta - dual-processor?
Can the beta testers with dual-CPU machines confirm
David,
Can you go over how you see them helping and what the positive benefit would
be in tweaking those values? For example: by setting the WAITBETWEENTHREADS
to 1 second it will help by .
Darrell
David Barker writes:
2 new Directives
WAITFORTHREADS 1500
Located in the
2 new Directives
WAITFORTHREADS 1500
Located in the Declude.cfg - Defined in milliseconds eg. 1500 = 1.5 seconds
this can be changed so that when the maximum threads are in use this time
specifics the wait before checking to launch more threads.
WAITBETWEENTHREADS 1
Are these the suggested defaults?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:41 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted
WAITFORTHREADS 1500
WAITBETWEENTHREADS 1
Are the suggested defaults
David B
www.declude.com
PS. Darrell, I will answer your question shortly, just waiting on some
feedback from developers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Different systems / configuration respond differently to these settings.
In particular they to fine tune through-put with CPU utilization.
1. SLOW server that is heavily loaded
You may want to try to increase WAITBETWEENTHREADS and lower THREADS.
2. FAST server
Use the THREADS and
David, too clarify, is that THREAD or THREADS? Originally it was THREAD.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 9:00 AM
To:
John,
It has always been THREADS
From the Beta page:
Performance
1. Create a file in your Declude folder called declude.cfg
2. Add the following directive THREADS 5
3. The default is 5 threads
4. This value can be adjusted to allow more threads to run
David Barker
Thank you David - will let you know if I see any issues!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
2 new Directives
WAITFORTHREADS 1500
Located in the Declude.cfg - Defined in milliseconds eg. 1500 = 1.5 seconds
this can be changed so that when the maximum threads are in use this time
specifics the
David,
Am I to assume that the identifiers "SLOW server" and "FAST server" are
completely relative to the amount of CPU utilization? For instance, I
have a very fast server, but it does a ton of work and can experience
high CPU utilization, especially in spikes. So is the trick here
really
Am I to assume that the identifiers SLOW server and FAST server are
completely relative to the amount of CPU utilization? For instance, I have
a very fast server, but it does a ton of work and can experience high CPU
utilization, especially in spikes. So is the trick here really just the CPU
IMail 8.05 HF3
Downloaded and installed 3.0.4.4. Message file pairs were appearing in the
'proc' folder, subsequently moved to 'work' folder, then dispositioned as
needed. Observed this for 10-15 minutes, then went about business.
Checking back, I found that the 'decludedproc.exe' service was
I would ask that you go back to 3.0.4.4 and keep running. If you have this
problem again, please do the same think and isolate the files, then send
them to Declude along with the log files.
This was seen before and was hopefully fixed, but if you are seeing it
please continue to run 3.0.4.4 and
-- Original Message --
From: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:49:41 -0700
I would ask that you go back to 3.0.4.4 and keep running. If you have this
problem again, please do the
20 matches
Mail list logo
