RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread Lyndon Eaton
Hi, Just upgraded to Declude version 3.0.5 today (from 1.8!) and I'm a little unsure of how to monitor HiJack. Can't get the deccon.exe to open although I know declude now runs as a service. Had a look at the HiJack manual but can't find anything and done a quick search in the archives too.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
My understanding is Deccon is no longer used. A new GUI is in the works. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lyndon Eaton Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 6:41 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the delay in posting, John is correct we are replacing the Console with new functionality. This is currently in design and we will update you just as soon as we have a clearer picture of the delivery date. Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Newest Declude with smartermail?

2005-09-27 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Has anyone on the list tried the new version of Declude (which runs as a service) for smartermail? Just wondering if anyone found problems and if I should hold off on upgrading? --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread Lyndon Eaton
OK thanks for confirming. Regards, Lyndon Eaton John is correct we are replacing the Console with new functionality. This is currently in design and we will update you just as soon as we have a clearer picture of the delivery date. Email

[Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Gary Steiner
It used to be that when I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would get an automatic reply like the following: Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [xxx--]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-27 Thread David Lewis-Waller
I didn't take part in the beta of v3 but upgraded yesterday from 1.8x. However, I do notice a considerable CPU usage penalty some 100% more usage than in the previous version and commonly long queues in \proc waiting to be serviced. I have also seen a couple of emails from users with dual

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
David, Are you running a dual proc box - you did not say exactly? If you are let me know and I can help you verify if you are having the same dual proc issue I see. Darrell David Lewis-Waller writes: I didn't take part in the beta of v3 but upgraded yesterday from 1.8x. However, I do

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread David Barker
Hi Gary, Currently the we have the ticket response system temporarily disabled. As far as I am aware we have received all your messages. The way to open a ticket is to send an email to support @ declude.com you can also submit a ticket using http://support.declude.com/Customer/SubmitTicket.aspx

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-27 Thread Robert Shubert
Does this dual-processor issue affect system with HT (turned on)? Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Gary Steiner
I've been receiving a flurry of spam over the past two days where the spam gets delivered with no Declude header in the message. When viewing the log files, it seems that Declude scanned the message, found it to have a heavy spam weight, tried to move it to the hold directory, and failed with

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Dave Beckstrom
We've been having a similar problem with declude and smartermail. We receive email where the declude headers are showing up and the end of the body of the email and of course the email is delivered and not blocked. In the last 2 days we've had hundreds of spams that got through because of some

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Matt
Gary, If you want help resolving this from the list members, it would be best to post your Declude version and product levels, one such log snippet for a message, and also your global.cfg and the associated $default$.junkmail. I did note that you are using IMail 8.05, and I am on IMail 8.15

[Declude.JunkMail] Country Test Very odd Results

2005-09-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Anyone want to take a stab at this one I would appreciate it. 216.55.166.147 - IPWHOIS Says its being used in San Diego CA Declude via Countries Test Reports 09/27/2005 14:58:39.015 q96320ffe0578da59.smd Msg failed COUNTRY (Message failed COUNTRY test (line 15, weight 5)). Action=WARN.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Test Very odd Results

2005-09-27 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Darrell-- This might have nothing at all to do with it, but maybe you need to update ALL_LIST.DAT... http://www.declude.com/version/release/all_list.dat There was a thread on this recently. Apparently, ARIN recently reassigned some blocks. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. - Original

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Test Very odd Results

2005-09-27 Thread Nick Hayer
Well this is more of a question than a stab - Can we see the full header? Yesterday I had something very similar - email from Venezuela but the ip was registered in Virginian according to Arin. -Nick Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Anyone want to take a stab at this one I would

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Kevin Bilbee
We don's see an issue with message being delivered incorrectly. But I have seen emails with the declude headers at the bottom of the message instead at the top of the message end of the headers section. I haveonlyseen this happening on message that have been detected to have the Detected

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Test Very odd Results

2005-09-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I don't have that specific one, but here is another one.. I have been getting pounded with this all day - this is way out of the norm. Only thing that has changed on this server is Declude 3.0 went on yesterday. This one came from 66.148.169.235 - ARIN says OrgName:NuVox

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Test Very odd Results

2005-09-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dave, I pulled that version down and compared the two (file sizes) and they were the same. I put that one in just in case. Darrell Dave Doherty writes: Hi Darrell-- This might have nothing at all to do with it, but maybe you need to update ALL_LIST.DAT...

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Gary Steiner
What made you think I was on IMail? I'm using SmarterMail 2.6. The Declude version I'm running is 2.0.6 (I purchased the product in July 2005). AUTOWHITELIST is definitely not ON. Here's a little snippet from the log file: 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 31 reaches

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread David Barker
Gary, Are your timings in your SmarterMail (command line time out) and (command timeout) set to 300 or have you lowered the time? David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, September 27,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Gary Steiner
David, As per our past off-the-list discussion, I had re-lowered the times to 120, but when this sudden increase of spam occurred yesterday, I raised them back up to 300. It doesn't seem to have had any effect. Gary Original Message From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Test Very odd Results

2005-09-27 Thread David Barker
Hey Guys, I just uploaded a new http://www.declude.com/version/release/all_list.dat see if this solves the problems that you have been seeing. David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread David Barker
It looks like SmarterMail may be grabbing the message before Declude can move it or make the changes needed, which seems to be a lot of the type problems you are facing. I would suggest trying the 3.0 release, if this solves your problem great if not it is always easy to revert to 2.0.6.16 by

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Dave Beckstrom
David, I don't know about Gary, but our timing is set at 320 and this did help significantly. However, it does not totally alleviate the problems. We still have emails that come through with the Declude headers displaying at the end of the email message. We also have a few emails that come

[Declude.JunkMail] new all_list.dat file

2005-09-27 Thread Markus Gufler
Thank you! Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:08 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Test Very odd Results Hey Guys, I just

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support

2005-09-27 Thread Matt
Gary, Sorry, this was my own incomplete read on your message headers. SmarterMail doesn't insert a Received header when you use Webmail, but I should have caught that. I'm with David about the potential cause of the issue. Looks like something is stealing the message, and that something is

[Declude.JunkMail] 3.0.5 report

2005-09-27 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
We upgraded this afternoon to 3.0.5 as our spool was once again growing for no reason... Everything seems pretty stable for nowin porting messages back over for re-processing, we did have one more occurance of a queue-growth, but a quick stop of services, renaming spool directory got us back

[Declude.JunkMail] Ver 3.0.5 What is the Proc Directory and why is all the mail going to it.

2005-09-27 Thread Frederick Samarelli
I just upgraded to the latest posted version of declude. Now all my mail goes to a directory. \imail\spool\proc Why. Fred --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The