[Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Here's this morning's biggest loser: we HOLD on 20, and this spammer achieved a whopping: DSBL:6 SPAMCOP:10 BADHEADERS:6 HELOBOGUS:6 REVDNS:4 ROUTING:8 IPNOTINMX:2 NOLEGITCONTENT:2 COUNTRY:10 COMMENTS:153 SNIFFER:7 FIVETENSRC:5 EASYNET-DNSBL:7 EASYNET-DYNA:6 EASYNET-PROXIES:5 BH-CNKR:10

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread Sean Fahey
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:01 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer! Here's this morning's biggest loser: we HOLD on 20, and this spammer achieved

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread paul
DSBL:6 SPAMCOP:10 BADHEADERS:6 HELOBOGUS:6 REVDNS:4 ROUTING:8 IPNOTINMX:2 NOLEGITCONTENT:2 COUNTRY:10 COMMENTS:153 SNIFFER:7 FIVETENSRC:5 EASYNET-DNSBL:7 EASYNET-DYNA:6 EASYNET-PROXIES:5 BH-CNKR:10 SORBS-HTTP:7 PSBL:5 CBL:5 GIBBERISHBODY:3 VERISCAM:7 BENTALLIPBL:7 BENTALLSPAMHINT:22

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
DSBL:6 SPAMCOP:10 BADHEADERS:6 HELOBOGUS:6 REVDNS:4 ROUTING:8 IPNOTINMX:2 NOLEGITCONTENT:2 COUNTRY:10 COMMENTS:153 SNIFFER:7 FIVETENSRC:5 EASYNET-DNSBL:7 EASYNET-DYNA:6 EASYNET-PROXIES:5 BH-CNKR:10 SORBS-HTTP:7 PSBL:5 CBL:5 GIBBERISHBODY:3 VERISCAM:7 BENTALLIPBL:7 BENTALLSPAMHINT:22

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread paul
Paul, those last 3 tests are our in-house tests that may or may not be suitable for anyone else. The first of the three is an IPFILE test that contains our banned IPs. We put them here instead of IMail because we like the logging of the mail-handling decisions to all be in Declude's log.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread Kami Razvan
] Bah, puny spammer! Paul, those last 3 tests are our in-house tests that may or may not be suitable for anyone else. The first of the three is an IPFILE test that contains our banned IPs. We put them here instead of IMail because we like the logging of the mail-handling decisions to all