riginal Message -
From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 11:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
I like the tangent but does anyone have a response to my question???
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [
[Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
>
>
> Well, now that you put it that way, probably not... ;-)
>
> Bill
> - Original Message -
> From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:36 PM
> Subject: RE: [Dec
Well, now that you put it that way, probably not... ;-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
Does it make a difference who is supplying th
5:29 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
>
> I think you've got it backwards, SBC acquired AT&T but is keeping the AT&T
> name.
>
> Bill
> - Original Message -
> From: "John T (Lists)" <[E
I think you've got it backwards, SBC acquired AT&T but is keeping the AT&T
name.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:23 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
And since
nkMail Declude
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
>
> Is there a relationship here. I am getting legit email from this combo and
> would like to know. It looks to me like prodigy is now owned by SBC.
>
>
>
> Kevin Bilbee
>
> ---
> [This E-ma
Is there a relationship here. I am getting legit email from this combo and
would like to know. It looks to me like prodigy is now owned by SBC.
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
34-3414 x20
(Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:45 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using
challen
, 2005 8:57
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using challenge-response
>> IMail won't
let Declude send as <>. That's the
problem.<<
Almost. The problem is that Declude still CHOOSES to use
the Imail1.
n Behalf Of MattSent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:45
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using
challenge-responseIMail won't let Declude send as
<>. That's the problem.MattAndy Schmidt
wrote:
>> If I could I
Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kami
Razvan
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:15 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
S
om:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:15
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using challenge-response
"BTW, Kami has
had repeated issues with C/R stopping his receipts. I
Title: Message
"BTW, Kami has had
repeated issues with C/R stopping his receipts. I'm not totally sure of
the details there."
WE HATE EARTHLINK.. everyday we get 20-30 C/R to our
receipts. We simply delete them since it is impossible to keep
up.
If I could I would bounce their C/R so i
Title: Message
Andy Schmidt wrote:
The lack of a properly implemented
challenge/response mechanism for Imail/Declude (for those who like to
implement it) has always been a disadvantage.
Ugg. Virtually every C/R that my server receives is associated with
spam and it is very diff
ECTED]
On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:52
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using challenge-response
Hi Andy,
Well, this one didn't come from a NULL sender...
so it looks like B from your keys below falls flat. I have no idea as to
whether EarthLink does A or C.
Darin.
riday, April 15, 2005 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using
challenge-response
Darin,
what's
the problem? As long as Challenge/Response messages originate from
"<>" (the null sender) it wouldn't matter if two major ISPs do
it.
They
key is:
Ouch!
Ok, so I'm a little behind the times...just hadn't
seen any in the hold queue before now.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Scott
Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using
like to implement it) has always been a
disadvantage.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Friday, April 15, 2005 09:29
AMT
e.com
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 8:29
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now
using challenge-response
Ugh... I just saw a Challenge-Response email from
an EarthLink user in the hold queue. It's obviously an EarthLink
service. I assume they've exempted other Earth
Ugh... I just saw a Challenge-Response email from
an EarthLink user in the hold queue. It's obviously an EarthLink
service. I assume they've exempted other EarthLink users from this, but I
wonder what will happen when another major ISP decides to do it as well...
insanity...
Darin.
PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Earthlink Porn Spam
Mark,mail-archive.com converted the text attachment to just
a part of the message if you wish to cut and paste it from
there. http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail%40declude.com/msg21757.htmlMattMark
E. S
on the archive and the attachment isn't there.
Thanks.
Mark
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn Spam
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:47
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn Spami360
Support wrote:
I am still getting a ton o
day, November 01, 2004 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn Spam
i360 Support wrote:
I am still getting a ton of porn
spam from Earthlink.
I report it but it does not help
much.
Any sugges
Matt,
What
does the (ALL) do as in "SPAMCOP(ALL)"?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
MattSent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:47 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Earthlink Porn Spami3
Thanks,,,
H.
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:46
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink
Porn Spam
i360 Support wrote:
I am still getting a ton of porn spam from
UK, and so forth.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford
Sent: Monday,
November 01, 2004 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
i360 Support wrote:
I am still getting a ton of porn
spam from Earthlink.
I report it but it does not help
much.
Any suggestions on how to stop this
crap?
Attached is the filter that I use to kill this stuff. Last I checked,
there were two different spammers tha
It looks like this is coming from Korea. I don't know if you are able but
we blocked many foreign IP addresses and this cut down on our SPAM
dramatically without any false positives so far. We have no need to
communicate with countries outside of North America.
Hope this helps...
Kevin
At 03:21 P
I've looked in the logs and found the following error reported:
DNS Server (gives the IP) returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
(gives the domain).
It's actually the IMail SMTP log file entries ("SMTP" or "SMTP-") that you
want to look at for problems delivering mail to remote mailserve
03 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink, AOL, HOTMAIL
The question is what do the Imail logs say?
Is the mail being bounced because you can't make a connection?
We have not seen any problem with bounces.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www
MAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Parks
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:09 AM
> To: Declude. JunkMail
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink, AOL, HOTMAIL
>
>
> Is anybody else having trouble with mail being returned from
> these domains.
> The returned email shows no consi
Is anybody else having trouble with mail being returned from these domains.
The returned email shows no consistent errors and well over half the time
only reports that mail was undeliverable. It's not consistent, and does not
affect all addresses, but it is wide spread.
---
[This E-mail was scann
I have a user that sends email from his earthlink account and recently the
mail has been being caught by spam domains. I think the user made a
configuration change and is using an alternate mail server.
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'earthlink.' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent fr
34 matches
Mail list logo
