: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS and negative weights?
Why not configure it like
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\sd.txt x 5 -5
This will give +5 points to any mail having a sender-domain listet in
sd.txt and failing this test. On the other side any legit
Hi all,
I want to run this by everyone before I do something potentially stupid...I
have occasions where good yahoo.com mail fails a FILTER or SNIFFER test and
along with failing NOPOSTMASTER and NOABUSE as yahoo always does, this
throws it over my bounce threshhold.
I'd like to ward this off by
Is my logic solid here? Anything I'm missing?
Why not configure it like
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\sd.txt x 5 -5
This will give +5 points to any mail having a sender-domain listet in
sd.txt and failing this test. On the other side any legit message having
such a
: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS and negative weights?
Is my logic solid here? Anything I'm missing?
Why not configure it like
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\sd.txt x 5 -5
Why not configure it like
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\sd.txt x 5 -5
This will give +5 points to any mail having a sender-domain listet in
sd.txt and failing this test. On the other side any legit message having
such a sender-domain that come from the right mailserver will
The catch here is that all E-mail from domains that aren't
listed in the
sd.txt file will get a weight of -5 added to them, so that spam from
domains not listed in the sd.txt file will be more likely to
be delivered.
Is there any easy way to change this in a future release? As I can
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS and negative weights?
Why not configure it like
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\sd.txt x 5 -5
This will give +5 points to any mail having a sender-domain listet
The catch here is that all E-mail from domains that aren't
listed in the
sd.txt file will get a weight of -5 added to them, so that spam from
domains not listed in the sd.txt file will be more likely to
be delivered.
Is there any easy way to change this in a future release?
Do you mean that
A better way to do this is to setup a RDNS Filter and add a
negative weight for any domain that you add that resolves
correctly, like yahoo.com. For
example:
Global.cfg:
REVDNS-FILTER filter M:\IMail\Declude\RevDNS-Filter.txt x 0 0
REVDNS-FILTER (samples):
REVDNS -10 ENDSWITH
Do you mean that you think the SPAMDOMAINS test should work
with domains
that aren't listed in the sd.txt file? If so, what should
the reverse DNS
entry match?
No. I mean that the test fails only if the from-domain was found in the
sd.txt file and the corresponding REVDNS- records does
The problem here is that instead of having a test with 2 results
(pass/fail), you've got a test with 3 results (pass/fail/na). That would
require a major change to the Declude architecture to handle.
But it would make sense G.
Would it?
The only tests I can think of that can have more than 2
Or, simply fixing the one test to have pass/fail weights assignable with
each test (in the .txt file, rather than the weights defined once in the
global.cfg, where in this case, they would be set to zero, zero -- thus
unknown domains are ignored)
something like:
.yahoo.co .yahoo. 5 -5
voila - a
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 04:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS and negative weights?
The problem here is that instead of having a test with 2 results
(pass/fail), you've got a test with 3 results (pass/fail/na). That
would require a major change
13 matches
Mail list logo
