.
- Original Message -
From: Gufler Markus | Limitis
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:53 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Matt, Darin
would it possible that you both forget, that 99,9+% of all incomming formmail
spam is send from
The PCRE for yahoo.co.uk might just be the ticket.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:58 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score
, April 09, 2008 11:54 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Matt,
I did understand. What I'm saying is that it doesn't always work. To
clarify, in addition to less sophisticated automated form fillers that would
fill out all fields
.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Marc Catuogno
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
One thing we did on our domain is to ban pasting so that the scripts couldn't
paste their info into our fields
PROTECTED]
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:22 PM
*Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
One thing we did on our domain is to ban pasting so that the scripts
couldn't paste their info into our fields. Also I
You can use the settings in Declude.cfg to stop certain character sets.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell
Ard
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 7:41 AM
To: Declude
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Need help in setting up filter please
We are getting
PCRE (?i:google.{3,10}pagead/iclk)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:58 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering - David Barker
David
] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:11 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering - David Barker
The expression I gave you does match on (discount. Coupon) in 85%
discount.
Coupon #zH5d
If it is not triggering you may have
08, 2008 11:32 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering - David Barker
Hi David,
The filter is not triggering. That IS the issue I am reporting! I provided
log snippets showing that the filter does run, but is not triggering. This
is the problem
user error. :)
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:48 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering - David Barker
Dave,
Do
We're almost always Bcc'd
Consider using BCC
This test will catch E-mail that has a lot of local recipients that are not
listed in the E-mail headers. This test is normally only used in advanced
setups, as most mailing list E-mail has many recipients not listed in the
headers.
BCC
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score.
We're almost always Bcc'd
Consider using BCC
This test will catch E-mail that has a lot of local recipients that are not
listed in the E-mail headers. This test is normally only used in advanced
setups, as most mailing list E-mail has many
: Friday, April 04, 2008 7:09 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.4.00 Released
Andre -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
David Barker said:
DEC ADD Added date, Time, Email, Spool name, Weight and Tests
failed
to the BLKLST log
I thinks its
Spaces before the phrase are not used as the line is normalized. Also the
regular CONTAINS is not case sensitive.
It would be better to use
SUBJECT 0 PCRE(?i:(discount|off).{0,2}Co(upon|de))
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Dave,
I noticed with the relevant lines from the filter posted below some of
the lines were indented more than the one line. Is it possible you have
extraneous whitespaces between contains and the text you want to filter on?
Dsrrell
--
Check out
: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:42 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering
Dave,
I noticed with the relevant lines from the filter posted below some of
the lines were indented more than the one line. Is it possible you have
extraneous
PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
I'm looking for a little help creating SPF records. I'm trying to use
the tools at openspf.org.
We only have one server that sends out mail for our domain
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
I have posted the backscatter filters we use under the download section of
Declude, any feedback is welcome.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 6:42 PM
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering
Dave,
I noticed with the relevant lines from the filter posted below some of
the lines were indented more than the one line. Is it possible you have
extraneous whitespaces between contains and the text you want to filter
Of
Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 3:40 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering
Dave,
From my experience I have had number of problems with spaces that would
cause my filter files not to trigger. I have since
Well, actually the MOST sense would be mmdd, since it
would result in SORT order.
I agree, and hope that 4.5.00 or 5.0.01 would finaly support MMDDHH
It would be a great innovation (at least comparable to the 4.4 enhancements)
Markus
---
This E-mail came from the
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:43 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
Jim -
I'm running the exact same set up as you are. We had the same problem about
two weeks ago. I don't know
David Barker said:
DEC ADD Added date, Time, Email, Spool name, Weight and Tests
failed
to the BLKLST log
Dave, the what log?
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, March 27,
Andre -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
David Barker said:
DEC ADD Added date, Time, Email, Spool name, Weight and Tests
failed
to the BLKLST log
I thinks its the recording to the blklst.txt file that lives in the
\spool dir.
I have forgotten the files purpose...
-Nick
Has anyone tried this option yet?
DEC ADD Can use for 4 digit year on log file names in the
format ddmm
IS the format really ddmm - it seems like it would make more sense
if the format was actually mmdd?
Especially since the regular format of
I just checked and I am seeing this as well.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring,
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
Adolfo
PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.4.00 Released
Andre -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
David Barker said:
DEC ADD Added date, Time, Email, Spool name,
Weight and Tests
failed
be like trying to impose the weird multipliers of the imperial UOM
on the rest of the world. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 7:13 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 4.4.0 leaving some trash?
I just checked and I am seeing this as well.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude
:33 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 4.4.0 leaving some trash?
I just checked and I am seeing this as well.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF
We have been made aware of this and are currently looking into the cause, it
seems to be AVG that is the source, if used in combination with a 3rd party
scanner. We are trying to replicate the issue to have it resolved.
David B
From: Adolfo Justiniano
I found out that the problem in part is due to users using VPN, and the
internal addresses are not whitelisted. In the Global.cfg file, can you
whitelist a range of ipaddresses, such as 198.107.21.1 - 198.107.21.255?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Lucas
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spoofed names
I found out that the problem in part is due to users using VPN, and the
internal addresses are not whitelisted. In the Global.cfg file, can you
whitelist a range
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon
Lucas
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spoofed names
I found out that the problem in part is due to users using VPN, and the
internal addresses
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:46 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spoofed names
You have to use CIDR range as the example you provided:
WHITELIST IP 198.107.21.0/24
: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:17 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spoofed names
Hi David...
I applied the CIDR address range to the global.cfg WHITELIST, but emails sent
via VPN are still getting filtered into the SPAM folder. I am still scratching
my head
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:46 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spoofed names
You have to use CIDR range as the example you provided:
WHITELIST IP 198.107.21.0/24
However remember that users who authenticate with the server are automatically
: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:10 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spoofed names
Are you authenticating with your mail server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Lucas
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:00 PM
Of Dan Shadix
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:50 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
I, for one, like infrequent but solid updates. I don’t have time to be
constantly installing and testing updates, especially if they are problematic.
Also
.2
Toll Free: 1-866.332.5833 Ext.2
Fax: 978.334.0700
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Todd Richards
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
I totally agree with Dan’s email
Jim,
While others may cringe regarding this, but some of the backscatter I
have had to deal with (excess of 500-1000 messages a minute at times) I
have had to put filters in place to delete null senders for periods of time.
Darrell
Jim Comerford wrote:
Over the last several weeks we have
I have been having exactly the same problem on both mail servers.
Both are.
Imail 8.15
Declude 4.3.64
invURIBL 3.1.1
Sniffer
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.net
LEGAL DISCLAIMER - This message may contain confidential, proprietary or
We use 2 filters to address the issue which work well for us. I will make
them available on our website this week.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Comerford
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:46 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
Same here, we normally run 100 or so messages a min @ 70% spam, now
seeing peaks of 400-500 @ 97% Seems much worse in the last 2 weeks or
so. I think that we all have lots of company.
Herb
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Jim,
While others may cringe regarding this, but some of the
Jim -
I'm running the exact same set up as you are. We had the same problem about
two weeks ago. I don't know if this made much difference or not, but I
noticed the domains that we were seeing this with did not have any SPF
records in place. So when I saw this sudden increase come through,
to keep them from getting into the queue manager.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:25 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
We use 2
The filter deals with Backscatter. Jon is the issue you are talking about is
your mail server bouncing messages?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Lucas
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
PROTECTED]
_
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Linda
Pagillo
Envoyé : 3 avril, 2008 14:35
À : declude.junkmail@declude.com
Objet : Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Thank you Todd. It's my pleasure!
If you have any further questions, please do
... but I noticed the domains that we were seeing this with did not have any
SPF records in place. So when I saw this sudden increase come through, I
added a strict SPF policy for that domain. The backscatter for that domain
all but stopped. ...
Good thing to check... the latest domain to
] On Behalf Of Stephan
Chayer
Sent: 03 April 2008 22:21
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Dan, Todd,
I feel a little like you.
We are using, selling and supporting Declude for the past 4 years. It works
great for us. Especially since
PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Todd Richards
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:43 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
Jim -
I'm running the exact same set up as you are. We had the same
problem
I'm looking for a little help creating SPF records. I'm trying to use
the tools at openspf.org.
We only have one server that sends out mail for our domain. We have a
secondary server that accepts email sent to our domain if our primary
server is down (myriadnetwork.com). After going through
Hi Andy,
Your example is with our engineers. we will get back to you as soon as we have
a answer. Should be today.
David
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 6:34 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
David,
This email was sent to the wrong Andy...
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:09 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: [049-0F7F8DF6-BE66] Invalid ZIP
Oka.
I am off to get the trial right now!
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
www.123marbella.net
LEGAL DISCLAIMER - This message may contain confidential, proprietary or
legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the
addressee named above. If
: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:03 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] My server has been totally revived!!!
Oka.
I am off to get the trial right now!
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
www.123marbella.net
LEGAL DISCLAIMER - This message may
Now there is a good question.
At 10:13 AM 4/2/2008 -0700, you wrote:
After seeing Mattâs post here about not renewing his JunkMail
subscription. Iâm asking Declude to respond to the group as to why any of
us with perpetual licensing. Our SA expires soon and I would like to know
the
Kevin,
Every effort has been made to ensure that major releases are problem free, this
has been the reason for the delay in major releases, however if you notice that
between major releases we make available several interim releases just as Scott
had done in the past.
Reasons for
but the others
that I’ve seen were a lot more expensive.
Everyone has to choose the product that works for them. Declude works for me.
Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:58 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE
It is expected to work with 10 but will only know when it is released.
David B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:08 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS
Thanks I just want to be clear that SORBS is different to ORDB
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William
This is without a doubt a very important thing to check out. It stung
our system, and I'm sure there are others around here that have yet to
check theirs for any ORDB tests. The hits for all IP's began yesterday
morning for us.
Thanks,
Matt
Michael Hardrick wrote:
Everyone here
Increase from a lot of FP's to exactly how many more?
:)
Matt
David Barker wrote:
Any increase on False Positives with SORBS being experienced ?
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 x 7007 office
978.988.1311 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
11:08 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS
Increase from a lot of FP's to exactly how many more?
:)
Matt
David Barker wrote:
Any increase on False Positives with SORBS being experienced ?
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our
We are getting A LOT
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 8:13 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS
Was working with a customer who was claiming
. 727.724.2610
fx. 727.724.2680
cl. 727.638.6208
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Baranowski
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:02 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS
We are getting A LOT
Rick
Thanks I just want to be clear that SORBS is different to ORDB
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
Stillwell
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:35 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS
Orbs
Scott the only way I have done a NOT is in the following example where this
will match on the expression but NOT on levitra using (?!levitra)
(?i:(?!levitra)\bl.{0,2}e.{0,2}v.{0,2}[|li1í!].{0,2}t.{0,2}r.{0,[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
I have attempted to work this type of expression into
Smartermail actually works.
~Rick
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hirthe,
Alexander
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:44 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware upgrade -Software Crossgrade?
Hello,
we are going to move to
.
If you are thinking of migrating, do your research first mate.
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
www.123marbella.net
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Klinge
Sent: 10 March 2008 13:19
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE
Alexander, you are really citing two problems with your scale and
performance.
The first is that you have older hardware and lots of mailboxes. Where
do your CPU and disk spend their time? On antispam, or on servicing
connections and mailboxes?
The second is that your spam detection is less
Do you expect to receive russian messages (other than spam) if not than
you can filter by charset koi8-r. Charset filtering is not CPU intensive.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.
Had to hold off for AVG changes they have issued a new sdk which we had to
test with Declude. It will be within the next 14 days.
DB
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 11:58 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
Like many peddlers of security software, they can sell more by portraying
the situation as worse than it really is. I tried this on an ISP who has
been in the business since 1997. Aggressively anti-spam, although they have
to fight against stolen account passwords, etc.
Reputation: Likely
Check the IMAP logs of recent compared to some of the older ones. We
should rule out that someone is not hitting you with excessive
connections etc. A couple weeks ago one of my systems started having
problems with the POP3 service being slow or timing out. It turned out
someone was running
1) Are they just q files or d files or both?
2) Tripple check the DNS server(s) being used for problems.
3) Do you have a lot of large mailboxes? Has the amount of email flowing in
increased?
4) Review information on the Sniffer list about updating to the new service
model.
Also, what version of
On Feb 29, 2008, at 1:38 AM, John T wrote:
1) Are they just q files or d files or both?
Both, 13000 files this morning from overnight total
.2) Tripple check the DNS server(s) being used for problems.
I have, plus we tried an external DNS and same issue.
3) Do you have a lot of large
David,
Comment's inline
(2) Declude is failing to make connections on RBL tests about 10 to 20%
of the time. Running in debug mode will show one message running
against multiple DBL tests, and then the message will show the first 5
DBL tests running, and the rest fail with no connection
-Original Message-
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which RBL's are timing out? Is your DNS server having problems? Is
your DNS server local to the mail server or is it located somewhere else?
It is totally random ... sometimes none of them for several messages, other
It might help to open task manager and reduce the service priority for
the time being to give you a little more breathing room until you get
the problem sorted out.
Brian
David Dodell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which RBL's are
MAILFROM
This test checks the SMTP envelope Mail From: address (which should be the
sender of the E-mail) and makes sure that the domain name it is coming from
is valid. This way, if mail is sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will
get caught (since $$$success$$$.com is not a valid domain).
David B
a heads-up where the messages are coming from.
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] why isn't this message deleted
Yes, it will work. However, I think you'll
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] why isn't this message deleted
I don't believe it will work that way for you. Forwarded messages are not
scanned twice, so I believe
Create a domain-specific config, and set it in there. There are examples of
domain-specific configs in the Junkmail manual.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] why
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/
Third bullet down.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo Blocking Email
Rob,
We are using domain keys and reverse DNS as well as SPF records. Do you
have a link to where I would request
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo Blocking Email
That's not the correct page, that page is primarily for bulk E-mail senders
so that they can keep their lists clean.
Use this page instead. At the bottom is a link to the form that starts the
process:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail
Yes, it will work. However, I think you'll want the delete setting put on
inbound messages rather than outbound. In other words, do the scanning and
actions on the inbound message to that account, before it is forwarded to the
other account. You'll also want to be careful that you're not
Of Shayne
Embry
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 7:24 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Tqmcube.com dead???
Very interesting. I just picked up on this discussion.
What makes it interesting to me is that I received a DNSstuff RBLalert last
night
that said one
Chuck, was it just the prc.tqmcube.com that returned these?
I see on their own RBL checker web page that only the Peoples Republic
of China zone returns this error.
When I query their servers for a few test IPs, including 127.0.0.2, I
don't get an error or a positive response, everything fails.
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 2:58 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Tqmcube.com dead???
Chuck, was it just the prc.tqmcube.com that returned these?
I see on their own RBL checker web page
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:58 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Tqmcube.com dead???
Chuck, was it just the prc.tqmcube.com that returned these?
I see on their own RBL checker web
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:41 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo Blocking Email
I did this once about a year and a half ago for a client and they
responded fairly quickly, but the full
I did this once about a year and a half ago for a client and they
responded fairly quickly, but the full process took about a month before
they whitelisted it.
If you are bulk mailing from your hosted mail server, you need to stop.
Never send bulk E-mail from a hosted mail server, and it is
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
Schick
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:06 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Tqmcube.com dead???
We are seeing this on the dhcp.tqmcube.com - that is the only one we were
running
Oh, and one more thing...
If you allow non-mail server port 25 traffic to be sent from within your
network, you either want to block that entirely, or ensure that it
doesn't go out from the same IP address as your mail server. I have
seen many of my clients end up on lists like XBL because
, 2008 12:01 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo Blocking Email
And as a further best practice to what Matt is advising, I'll mention
that ideally you want to send all outbound mail from an IP that is
different from your inbound gateways. And that your
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo Blocking Email
More. Yahoo has whitelisting, and really cares about reverse DNS pointers
and Domain Keys. You might want to resubmit, they were fast for us way
back
when.
Rob
-Original Message-
From
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:01 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo Blocking Email
And as a further best practice to what Matt is advising, I'll mention
that ideally you want to send all
] On
Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:05 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Tqmcube.com dead???
Just an FYI
TQM cube is back up and running. Rumor has it that someone
poisoned their
DNS cache. They've since gone in and fixed
901 - 1000 of 21924 matches
Mail list logo
