Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
But Queuemanager is IMail, not Declude. Why would it run higher unless
there was more load on the server (i.e. more messages being processed)?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: GlobalWeb.net Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail
between IMail and Declude on
3.05.11?
Declude?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: GlobalWeb.net Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Your guess is as good as mine
; this would cause an increase...
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 11:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
H... very strange. The only thing I
.
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 11:34 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
I don't follow. How is declude dumping more mail for QM
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net
Webmaster
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 11:43 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Simple - if declude waits 5 seconds for example for processing, and in this
5 seconds there are now 100 messages present, they get
Darin Cox wrote:
In picture form, we're looking at something like
80 | /\ /\
40 | / \/ \
0 |__/\_/\___
vs
80 |
40 | ---
0 |___/ \___
Interesting...mine looks like this though :)
.::
for a picture... maybe saving a thousand words g.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Darin,
From following the thread he had
] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:06 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Is there any good reason why all of these various settings are not set up so
that each message gets processed as it comes in - only limiting
Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Darin Cox wrote:
In picture form, we're looking at something like
80 | /\ /\
40 | / \/ \
0
Wow... I think I need the specs on that environment... I must be doing
something very wrong.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Darin Cox
PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Simple - if declude waits 5 seconds for example for processing, and in this
5 seconds there are now 100 messages present, they get processed by declude
and then dumped
usage.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Darin,
One thing to factor in is that when you have a large group of processes
.
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Darin,
One thing to factor in is that when you have a large group of processes
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net
Webmaster
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:16 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
We upgraded to 3.0.5.11 tonight - big difference in CPU in that it's way
down from
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
We upgraded to 3.0.5.11 tonight - big difference in CPU in that it's way
down from the 3.0.5.5 -
but proc folder will accumulate approx 35-50 messages before it'll dump them
to the work folder. Do not see any problems so far except
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:39 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Randy try changing
WAITFORMAIL 1500
To
WAITFORMAIL 500
See if that changes the delay
, 2005 7:16 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
We upgraded to 3.0.5.11 tonight - big difference in CPU in that it's way
down from the 3.0.5.5 - but proc folder will accumulate approx 35-50
messages before it'll dump them to the work folder. Do not see
://globalweb.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net
Webmaster
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:13 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
I changed the THREADS to 75 and CPU wnet down to about
934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net
Webmaster
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:13 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
I changed the THREADS to 75 and CPU wnet down
My sentiments exactly. Well said.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 12:33 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Okay, I'm watching
: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:33 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Okay, I'm watching these discussions - as I'm still truly
scared of upgrading Declude.
I just can't figure out the logic behind all the CPU
consumption and why certain process
25, 2005 02:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
I'm surely with you about this Andy. Already enough time spent dealing with
adjusting filters to control spam and it seems by this list; more time is
spent being a directory monitor and a bug reporter
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Allow me to make a correction - under normal daytime loads, we are seeing an
increase in CPU - steady at 80-90%. Under 3.0.5.5 we saw an average of 40%
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-346-5300 x112
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112
http
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:01 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
David,
Do you have an exhaustive explanation of what
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net
Webmaster
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 11:12 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
I've changed WAITFORMAIL to 500 and this seemed to help a bit more. I am
still seeing a collection of about 50 messages before
Decludeproc and queuemgr
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:30 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Randy,
Can you confirm for me
the Declude upgrade?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: GlobalWeb.net Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Decludeproc and queuemgr
Randy
-Original Message-
From
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Hmmm... if queuemanager CPU is increasing, then that would point to more
messages being processed, wouldn't
Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:33 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Okay, I'm watching these discussions - as I'm still truly scared of
upgrading Declude.
I just can't figure out the logic behind all the CPU consumption and why
certain
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 4:14 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Andy, don't be scared I can hold you hand :)
How do I explain the apparent inconsistency
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
I'm surely with you about this Andy. Already enough time spent dealing
, 2005 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
No change in message load - I randomly picked approx 7pm yesterday to
upgrade.
Decludeproc service ran at a lower CPU at version 3.0.5.5
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-346-5300 x112
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112
.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
It seems to me that something changed
/webmessaging.
Perhaps that will help them see your problem clearer.
Travis
- Original Message -
From: Harry Vanderzand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
I have repeatedly switch back
4:26 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Hmmm? You said queuemanager increased CPU usage as well. Were you just
meaning that only decludeproc and queuemanager were using CPU on the server?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: GlobalWeb.net
.
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 4:45 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Can you give me an idea of the CPU % of each of these? I know
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Andy, don't be scared I can hold you hand :)
How do I explain the apparent inconsistency where users report that
the
CPU consumption is considerable higher than in the prior version?
First we need to confirm that it is decludeproc that has
:40 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Decludeproc runs at a higher CPU with v11 as compared to v5 - queuemgr also
runs a it higher. These 2 services are the ones that most consumes CPU with
v11
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:30 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Interesting ... .11 is working for me better than any
previous version -- proc and work are quickly cleared.
What process is jumping the CPU up so high? Decludeproc or
the anti
Support'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Dual Xeon 3.4Ghz 2GB ram imail 8.05 declude, sniffer invurbl
The issue is that without changing anything other than going to 3.05.11 this
occurs
It appears that processing has changed
If I could get some idea from Declude about this.
Maybe I
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Harry, try commenting out
#waitforthreads 1500
#waitbetweenthreads 100
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Monday
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Someone correct me, but with 3.4GHz couldn't you try THREADS 150 and back
down from there if needed? Wouldn't that help some?
From http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=167
Performance can vary due to server configuration, CPU
Duh, I failed 1st grade math. Try THREADS 75.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:36 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Someone correct me
, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:36 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Someone correct me, but with 3.4GHz couldn't
Of David Barker
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:40 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Yes, again the ideal is that the CPU usage bounces, So you
could start at 150 then if it pegged at 100% CPU try 125 etc.
David B
www.declude.com
Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Cc: 'Technical Support'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
Dual Xeon 3.4Ghz 2GB ram imail 8.05 declude, sniffer invurbl
The issue is that without changing anything other than going to 3.05.11
46 matches
Mail list logo
