I am using it here.
John,
How effective is it for you?
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
I have given it a weight of 15, with subject modification 15-19 and hold at
20.
Friday logs shows 6 caught out of 2826 messages.
So far, probably about 95% of messages that fail also fail at least one
other test.
That is probably why it never made it out of Beta.
It is a lot of work to keep up
I am working on an interface to control Imail rules to hold or delete mail
based on rankings from weight tests in declude. I have 6 seperate ranks of
spam from NONE (which as always can include misses) to VHIGH. It's not very
pretty right now, but it is fuctional. I plan on adding fuctionality,
I want to either delete or send to a specified mailbox all mail for a list
of recipients.
I manage about 250 users between 2 different domains, and because we are a
wholesale salesman based company we have chosen to use the nobody alias so
all misaddressed mail is routed to one mailbox. We get
Dan,
Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote:
DS I want to either delete or send to a specified mailbox all mail
DS for a list of recipients.
DS Is this possible using declude filters?
Yes, but I believe it would require a custom external test. As far as
I know there is no declude test that traps
Well that sounds like it could work, but might be tough for me. The only
perl I know is in a strand in my wife's jewlery box. :-)
I don't know any programming, guess I should learn sometime except there is
never any time. You are only using the perl script to look at the to:
address and then
Scott, any chance of doing this with the existing filters or adding a
location - To: for the filter to look? Or possibly getting a blacklist To:
function?
There is actually a ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62 that now allows you to
filter based on recipients.
One option (with Declude JunkMail
R.,
Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote:
RSP ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62
Is that documented somewhere and I just missed it?
How does it work?
Terry Fritts
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
RSP ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62
Is that documented somewhere and I just missed it?
Whoops -- it looks like it didn't get added to the release notes for 1.62.
How does it work?
It works as one of the filter options; for example:
ALLRECIPS 100 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I apologize if this has already been discussed at length. First, we
started bouncing spam about a week ago. I'm concerned about bouncing to
made up return addresses that turn out to be legitimate, innocent,
e-mail accounts. I'm also concerned about bogging down my server with
bounced bounce
So there is two ways to do this, filters and per user config?
If I used a Filter file like this:
ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would I need to put the entire email addy?
And is it only going to look at the entire thing or will it find user or
r2 out of the
Anyone know how to use the Adult Content filter in junkmail? I read about
this option in a 3rd party utility and I'm trying find out how to use it.
TIA
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Is there a way to have the HOLD option to hold in different folders for
different tests?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dan,
Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote:
DS Would I need to put the entire email addy?
Not necessarily.
DS And is it only going to look at the entire thing or will it find user or
DS r2 out of the above examples?
ALLRECIPS would have to match exactly with IS.
DS Wouldn't the IS
So there is two ways to do this, filters and per user config?
That is correct.
If I used a Filter file like this:
ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would I need to put the entire email addy?
Actually, you would need to use:
ALLRECIPS 0 CONTAINS
Is there a way to have the HOLD option to hold in different folders for
different tests?
No, this is not currently possible, but is in the suggestion database and
will likely be added to an upcoming release.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Thanks for the quick response Scott. Just one missed e-mail is time
sensetive, and could mean a lot of money to my company, so notification
to legitimate folks is vital.
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 14:43, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I apologize if this has already been discussed at length. First, we
Thanks for the quick response Scott. Just one missed e-mail is time
sensetive, and could mean a lot of money to my company, so notification
to legitimate folks is vital.
That depends.
If you are talking about the WEIGHT20 test, for example (which is normally
about 99+% spam), you're talking
Scott,
I am trying out the per user config and trying the catchallmails function.
I can only get it to work if there is a valid imail user. If there is no
imail user then the email is still getting routed to my root directory where
the misaddressed mail goes. I was hoping to be able to have it
I am trying out the per user config and trying the catchallmails function.
I can only get it to work if there is a valid imail user. If there is no
imail user then the email is still getting routed to my root directory where
the misaddressed mail goes. I was hoping to be able to have it work
I renamed global.cfg go global.bak and rebooted. Everything started OK, so I
renamed it bak to global.cfg and now declude is doing the same thing.
It clearly doesn't like something with the filters.
Here is what I have in the global.cfg
WEIGHT10weight x x 10 0
I renamed global.cfg go global.bak and rebooted. Everything started OK, so I
renamed it bak to global.cfg and now declude is doing the same thing.
What exactly is happening?
WEIGHT100 weight x x 100 0
OLDEMPLOYEE filter f:\IMail\Declude\oldemployee1.txt x 100 0
OLDEMPLOYEE filter f:\IMail\Declude\oldemployee1.txt x 100 0
and this is the content of the employee1.txt file:
This may be a typo, but it does not appear here that the actual file name
employee1.txt and the config option in the Global.cfg oldemployee1.txt
are the same. Just something to look
It doesn't look like you got the earlier message. Here it is:
I was in the middle of testing the filters, and initially go a couple of
errors in the log that said it could not open my filter file. I rechecked
the configuration for a typo and everything looked OK. I sent a couple more
emails and
Sorry, yes a typo. The filename did match the global.cfg line.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:57 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone
25 matches
Mail list logo
