RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Timing out with latest Microsoft patch

2003-09-13 Thread Keith Anderson
Just a follow-up to this problem, uninstalling the latest Microsoft patch fixed the problem. We're guessing that it has something to do with the total number of network connections, since that is the only thing that's different between Declue running and not running-- Declude opens a bunch per

[Declude.JunkMail] Strange Trail

2003-09-13 Thread Doug McKee
fantasticbradleys.net dragonstarts.com ENCHANTINGIDEAS.NET MITCHMYERSENT.BIZ SECURESERVER.NET a1fastrx.com Secureserver.net best-usa-rx.com secureserver.net EVERLAST123.BIZ wwdomains.com Secureserver.net jomax.net godaddy.com I discovered the above relationships while looking for

[Declude.JunkMail] tailing a log file

2003-09-13 Thread Darryl Koster
Does anyone on this know of or have a tool that will allow me to tail my system files or my declude log files while they are building? Something like the tail command on a linux machine? I just loaded (this has nothing to do with above) 1.75 with the comments filter, most of the mail that I was

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] tailing a log file

2003-09-13 Thread Bill Landry
Check out http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ for all of the latest UNIX utilities for Win32, including tail. Bill - Original Message - From: Darryl Koster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 8:37 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] tailing a log file

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] tailing a log file

2003-09-13 Thread Fritz Squib
Try http://www.wintail.com/ I've been using it for quite some time. Fritz Frederick P. Squib, Jr. Network Operations Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg Citizens Internet Services http://www.wpa.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] tailing a log file

2003-09-13 Thread Jeff Kratka
www.wintail.com Jeff Kratka * TymeWyse Internet P.O.Box 84 - 110 Ecklund St., Canyonville, OR 97417 tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] * -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Timing out with latest Microsoft patch

2003-09-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
For records sake, which patch was it? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Anderson Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 3:22 AM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] tailing a log file

2003-09-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Darryl, I use wintail from http://www.wintail.com. It's windows based, and I would prefer more of a unix based command line driven so that I could grep on it, but I havent ran across a very good one yet. Nonetheless, Wintail does the job. Darrell Invariant Systems

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] tailing a log file

2003-09-13 Thread Bill Landry
Hmmm, have you checked out http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ yet. All of the UNIX tools there are command line versions written for Win32 and work great, no different than we find on our Linux servers. Bill - Original Message - From: DLAnalyzer Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Turning the tables (funny)

2003-09-13 Thread Matthew Bramble
I found today the following piece of junkmail was blocked on my server. Make it all the way to the bottom for the punchline: Welcome to the site www.darkprofits.com, it's us again, now we extended our offerings, here is a list: 1. Heroin, in liquid and crystal form. 2. Rocket fuel

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] tailing a log file

2003-09-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Bill, I just downloaded and installed them. I am in the process of checking them out... Thanks for the heads up. Darrell Bill Landry writes: Hmmm, have you checked out http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ yet. All of the UNIX tools there are command line versions written for Win32 and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Timing out with latest Microsoft patch

2003-09-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Well, I guess I could test this by installing on my server, but I do not have the load you do. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Timing out with latest Microsoft patch

2003-09-13 Thread Keith Anderson
It's an extreme circumstance, so I won't blame Declude. After working on it for a few hours, the only thing that makes sense is that the patch is somehow limiting the number of network processes (more so than normal), and Declude pushes it over the edge. I wish there were a version of Imail and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Timing out with latest Microsoft patch

2003-09-13 Thread Matthew Bramble
Keith, First off, I can't believe that you can get a single Windows server to handle that load. Sounds like Microsoft didn't expect that was possible either... Your explanation makes sense regarding the number of network connections suddenly being limited somehow. I'm guessing that the same

[Declude.JunkMail] Encoded subject lines

2003-09-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
To continue the discussion on encoded subject lines, the ones I see as spam always have a short body and is always HTML like the following: (Without the extra spaces I through in there. html body cen te r !--pfuhja2jjk-- a href=http : //www . currency4.com /host/d efault.asp?I D=omni img

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS

2003-09-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Any one have an updated list to share? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Timing out with latest Microsoft patch

2003-09-13 Thread Keith Anderson
Hi Matt, Thanks for your suggestions. I don't claim to be an expert-- I just stumble along and ask for a lot of help when things go bad. I think we're going to buy another Declude license (pending budgetary issues) and offload outbound traffic to another machine. We already cache the DNS

[Declude.JunkMail] Move to a folder instead of ROUTETO

2003-09-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Is there a way to have a action of moving a D and Q file to a specified folder, (not a mailbox.) something like the ROUTETO action? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish body detector + inline Base64

2003-09-13 Thread Matthew Bramble
Markus, I've found myself that the subject test is only slightly useful in the scheme of things, but while I know a false positives will happen, I haven't seen any under that configuration in the last day. I've now stopped monitoring that test as a result. BTW, it's very good to know that

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2003-09-13 Thread Jeff Kratka
I have a couple of customers that want to be whitelisted completely so I added WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the global config. The only thing is that I have found out that if spam is sent to multiple recipients and this person is listed it is allowed to come to everyone on the list since the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2003-09-13 Thread Jon Lapp
WHITELIST FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead, I think. Jon Lapp Computer Systems Specialist Northstar Computer Forms, Inc. 716.763.5513 - Direct 716.763.0272 - Fax http://www.nscf.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Timing out with latest Microsoft patch

2003-09-13 Thread Matthew Bramble
Keith, Have you customized any registry settings for TCP/IP? I haven't installed the patch myself yet, but what I'll do is export that part of my registry before and after and do a comparison looking for changes. If you customized yours and they were set back to a default, that could cause a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2003-09-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a couple of customers that want to be whitelisted completely so I added WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the global config. The only thing is that I have found out that if spam is sent to multiple recipients and this person is listed it is allowed to come to everyone on the list since

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Move to a folder instead of ROUTETO

2003-09-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there a way to have a action of moving a D and Q file to a specified folder, (not a mailbox.) something like the ROUTETO action? Do you mean a directory on the hard drive (that's why we had to rename the FOLDER action to MAILBOX)? We're planning to change the HOLD action to specify a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2003-09-13 Thread Rich
At 04:10 PM 9/13/2003, Jeff Kratka wrote: I have a couple of customers that want to be whitelisted completely so I added WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the global config. The only thing is that I have found out that if spam is sent to multiple recipients and this person is listed it is allowed

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Move to a folder instead of ROUTETO

2003-09-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Is there a way to have a action of moving a D and Q file to a specified folder, (not a mailbox.) something like the ROUTETO action? Do you mean a directory on the hard drive (that's why we had to rename the FOLDER action to MAILBOX)? We're planning to change the HOLD action to specify a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2003-09-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Jeff, This is similar to the issue of whitelisting the postmaster account. Spammer's got hip to the fact that most people whitelist the postmaster account and would include as a recipient for the spam the postmaster. We were getting burned by this due to the high amount of porn spam that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2003-09-13 Thread Jeff Kratka
Thanks I'll try this out. Jeff Kratka -- Original Message -- From: DLAnalyzer Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:41:45 -0400 Jeff, This is similar to the issue of whitelisting the postmaster account.