[Declude.JunkMail] Mathew's Gibberish test

2003-10-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
A word of caution; Any one that processes messages frequently that contain part numbers, you should look for a key word in the body. Example, I have added the following line in both Gibberish and AntiGibberish: BODY0 CONTAINSparts You may also want to watch for words like

[Declude.JunkMail] Using Filter Locations Beyond MAILFROM

2003-10-03 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, All, I have a situation that I was hoping to get some feedback on. We have an e-mail user who is using our spam filtering service. They have a domain name setup with an outside e-mail hosting provider and all of the e-mail that is sent to that domain name gets forwarded over to his

[Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread Chuck Schick
Notice I cannot get to their site this morning. I hope that it is not another DDOS attack. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. 303-421-5140 www.warp8.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread Donna K Stanley
I went in this morning and took out the check for spam cop. We can't get any pdf's through our network at all. Unfortunately that didn't help. I don't know what else to do - I've been through all the stuff in imail AND declude and can not get them to work. It's not banned with banext, only pif

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread Sean Fahey
Are you running an older version of IMail (6.x)? We had that problem until we upgraded to 7.x and long before we started using Declude. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Donna K Stanley Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:53 AM To: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Donna, When editing the *.eml files that are returned back to the users in cases of banned extensions and the like you will need to use just plain old regular notepad or other basic text editor. Darrell Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Using Filter Locations Beyond MAILFROM

2003-10-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
First, others have stated and I agree SPAMDOMAINS should not be used with your own domains for a couple of reasons. The test was basically designed for the free type big mail services. Second, you need to redo your weight tests. You have a lot of overlapping and redundant tests configured. From

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Right click the .eml file and chose Open with... and chose Notepad. As far as the pdf issue, have you sent Scott a D file caught? If you want, you can send to me zipped off list along with the virus.cfg file. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread Donna K Stanley
We're using 7.0 Donna K. Stanley Network Services Region VIII ESC Mt. Pleasant, TX 903-575-2734 It is the Vision of Region VIII Educational Service Center to create a partnership between school districts, teachers, school board members, universities and community colleges, community members,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread Donna K Stanley
First, I have only been reading about Imail and Declude for 4 days! I'm not even sure which of us on this newly formed team is responsible for it, but I'm trying to help our 48 school districts get their email! SO... Who is Scott, and what's a D file? I looked through imail logs and couldn't

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using Filter Locations Beyond MAILFROM

2003-10-03 Thread Dan Geiser
John, I appreciate all of the feedback you provide to the Declude community but in all honesty I don't feel like you read my e-mail at all. If you look at the headers I included you will see that I am NOT using the SPAMDOMAINS test on our own domains. I am using SPAMDOMAINS on MINDSPRING.COM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Sorry to be short with my response, I a couple of major issues I need to deal with like yesterday. Off list means that if a person wants and if invited, you can send the files in question to one of us that offer for further review. Often, having a second pair of eyes helps to find causes. Scott

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Using Filter Locations Beyond MAILFROM

2003-10-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I appreciate all of the feedback you provide to the Declude community but in all honesty I don't feel like you read my e-mail at all. Dan, you are right, I read through your message too fast. My head is spinning right now with problems. You could do this: HEADERS (appropriateweight) CONTAINS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Spamcop Down?

2003-10-03 Thread Marc Catuogno
Just my 2 cents: Sometimes my word filters in declude junk mail would accidentally trigger a junk mail test and add weight to an innocent attachment, depending on how it was encoded. Also, while I know that PDF's are generally small, is it possible that the attachment exceeds the size allowed on

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Issues

2003-10-03 Thread Marc Catuogno
I was happy to take it. Maybe this will let us know what configuration actually works with 8.03 since Ipswitch won't put out a hardware recommendation. I personally applaud your efforts. Thank you - Sincerely, Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Issues

2003-10-03 Thread Sheldon Koehler
Kudos John! Already filled in and good luck. Sheldon Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023 Nationwide access, neighborhood support! Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Jason Newland
So as of Monday are we going to have a new organization running the .com / .net TLDs? lol It's about time Buh Bye Verislime Jason - Original Message - From: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:12 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Todd Holt
So they don't have to pay for all registrations? I don't understand this. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble Sent:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Bill Landry
Umm, I think you missed a zero somewhere... ;-) Bill - Original Message - From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:54 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again... Todd Holt wrote: IMHO, ICANN should send a

[Declude.JunkMail] Interesting.. indeed... long long long spam

2003-10-03 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi.. Spammers are not as dumb as we think they are... This spam we received... This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_58469_01C389A3.18FD3DB0Content-Type: text/plain;charset="Windows-1252"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Although there are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting.. indeed... long long long spam

2003-10-03 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
I've gotten two or three like this in the last couple days, but mine are getting tagged on with weight 21 or thereabouts. I delete on weight20. G.Z. - Original Message - From: Kami Razvan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 5:11 PM Subject:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Matthew Bramble
ICANN is just there to oversee the workings of the industry and they're not in it for profit. They charge registrars a fee based on the percentage of the number of registrations they are responsible for, and the total collected from all registrars is a number related only to organizational

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting.. indeed... long long long spam

2003-10-03 Thread Kami Razvan
"I've gotten two or three like this in the last couple days, but mine are getting tagged on with weight 21 or thereabouts. I delete on weight20." Yes in our case it was caught with a weight of 57. We hold on 20 and delete on 60 so this one was almost deleted. BUT -- the filters are our

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Frederick Samarelli
FrontPage of the Washington Post. VeriSign Freezes Search Service http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40241-2003Oct3.html - Original Message - From: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:12 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Todd Holt
So, ICANN comes up with a figure that is equal to the cost of maintaining the internet for a year and each registrar pays a percentage of that figure based on the percentage of all registrations that they manage? If this is true, then The wildcard in effect makes them customers of the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Matthew Bramble
Todd Holt wrote: So, ICANN comes up with a figure that is equal to the cost of maintaining the internet for a year and each registrar pays a percentage of that figure based on the percentage of all registrations that they manage? Exactly. If

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAM - Yahoo Groups

2003-10-03 Thread Karen D. Oland
If the group is improperly set up (allowing open posting to anyone that subscribes, with no checking of the email address or first posts by the moderator, then spammers have a field day on those groups (they can join and post within seconds, then move to the next group). Most that do this are

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] eBay - scam..

2003-10-03 Thread Karen D. Oland
We've been getting one with the link http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:%31%35%37/, covered with a gif that makes it look like the link is on ebay.com. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Schmidt not to speak of trademark and or copyright