Whoa! First post in like 4.5 months Scott. Did you have a good vacation?
Are you back to working on Declude?
:)
If so, when do you think there's going to be a new release that will
fix the
overflow issue related to:
[Application popup: Declude.exe - Application Error : The application
Title: Message
Just an update
Last week I had disabled Declude and
cleaned out my spool directory. For the next day I had not experienced
any issues. My spooled messages are staying well under 500 and mail is
flowing exactly how I want it to (without Declude). Now, we can get away
with
Now we had twice as much email that was junk.
It wasn't Imgate
It was Imail and Declude.
That was exactly our experience as well. Setting up a secondary mx
using Imail is the very reason our server got so overloaded and we had
to implement IMGate.
---
This E-mail came from the
Scott... it's great to have you back! ...even if it may be only for a little
while.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Woes
Whoa! First post
Title: Message
Hi Will,
We finally found our problems over the
weekend. They were two-fold. I'll document them here in the hopes
someone else with this problem will benefit.
1. IMail and Declude are using local MS
DNS. However, we had set up Forwarders in MS DNS, and thoseforwarded
DNS
Title: Message
Thanks Darin, this is very helpful and
informative.
Have you had an issue with MS DNS where it
had a hard time resolving with root servers? I have seen this and when I add a
forwarded to our upstream provider is works fine but I would rather
depend on root hits. My root
Title: Message
I checked, and my config does not contain
those DNS tests. My config came with the 2.0.6 install though.
Is this the line I should be looking for?
08/01/2005 10:45:49.781 Q358E01613310 [5904] Total Time: 31ms [313ms
elapsed minus DNS]
Will
-Original
Title: Message
Nope...as it says it doesn't report the time used
for DNS tests. You'll need to look through all lines for a particular
message and see if any say the DNS-based test times out.
I recommend using something like BareTail or
BareGrep from BareMetalSoft to find and/or highlight
Title: Message
Wehaven't, but then we've been using
forwarders with no recursion. Others on the list might be able to comment
on their experiences.
You could potentially use forwarders, but allow
recursion... meaning DNS will use the forwarder first, and then try directly if
it fails. We
Title: Message
Hi List,
I'm not sure if related or not, but since a few days we are getting at
MS DNS 2000 Server, many EventIDs 5504 messages saying that malformed
packets were received by some roots hints.
And besides that, some domains are resolved to.freeservers !!!
The cache
Does anyone know why occasionally the SMTP
header of Declude will show up in the message body?Here's an
example:-0-From: Rachel
Horton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Mon 8/1/2005 11:04 AMSubject:To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: This
week's casesDate: Mon, 01
Title: Message
Norton Corp. 10, updated everyday, says it's clean.
I'm afraid of M$ BUG.
No hotfix to download ( Windows Updated weekly )
The 5504 points to a couple of x.name-servers.net.
NO idea, and wrong surfing !!
Andres
Darin Cox escribi:
That's the same config we're
Title: Message
How
are you viewing the message? It is probably associated with the email
client settings.I know some email clients have the option of showing
headers - you have to make sure the option is turned off. This is also
true of webmail.
Chuck SchickWarp 8,
I’m not so sure it’s a DNS issue because the Imail spam filters run
perfectly fine,
which I am now using in place of Declude. They do not do as good a
job identifying
spam, but they are better than nothing.
It probably is a DNS issue. It sounds like the problem is that the
E-mails aren't
Chuck Schick wrote:
How are you viewing the message? It is probably associated with the
email client settings. I know some email clients have the option of
showing headers - you have to make sure the option is turned off. This
is also true of webmail.
I know what he is talking about.
Resending...
---BeginMessage---
One recent example of this was the result of an XINHEADER or XOUTHEADER
that was configured with an incorrectly formatted header. All such
headers cannot have any spaces before the first colon. The reason why
this might be only occasional is that this might
Resending...
---BeginMessage---
Dan,
policyd-weight looks even better. I also looked up that book and it
received very good reviews based on it's detail and depth of subject,
but with almost 500 pages I suppose that this is more of a reference
manual, though it does have chapters dedicated
I received a contact from one of our customers who discovered an e-mail
from within his own domain had been stuck into the spam box. When I
investigated I found out that it had been tagged by the CBL test.
Looking further if found the email address was on three different black
lists. OK, but the
Orin, all three listings are actually the same. The
last one you mention, SB-XBL shows that the IP is listed in XBL because XBL is a
composite list of blacklists, include CBL.
CBL is one of the few blacklists that expire listings
(somewhat more say they expire listings, but don't).
T-Mobile forces you to relay through their own SMTP servers, and they
leak a lot of spam. CBL will only list things that look like dynamic
IP's or have no reverse DNS entry. The T-Mobile servers give a bogus
HELO of mailrelay.t-mobile.com but their actual reverse DNS entries
show up as
Title: Message
It's being viewed in Outlook 2003 through Exchange. It's
not a header setting.
We just us Declude/Imail as a Gateway for
Exchange.
Very odd.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
SchickSent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:30 PMTo:
21 matches
Mail list logo
