[Declude.JunkMail] Ok - What is best

2002-02-27 Thread Bennie
Ok guys... What would be the best way for me to block stuff Like this... but let legit things thru... emails that have bad headers... ( we have one customer that gets jokes from a list .. but the list has bad headers... so if I block bad headers.. the emails dont get thru) --

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] fromfile

2002-02-27 Thread Charles Frolick
Might be easier to make a seperate test that uses regular expression test. This would give us more control, and we could build more complex whitelist and blacklist entries. Just a thought. Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]O

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] fromfile

2002-02-27 Thread Terrence Koeman
Why not remove the 'internal' wildcards and force users to specify them with '?' and '*'? -- Regards, Terrence Koeman Technical Director/Administrator MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.nl) Please quote all replies in correspondence. - -Original Message- - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [m

MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] fromfile

2002-02-27 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Hello R., Wednesday, February 27, 2002, 14:46:39 PM, you wrote: >>If I put in "example.co" or even just ".co", will it still block mail from >>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? RSP> Yes, it will. >>I think I read this to mean there was an implied >>wildcard to the left of whatever is listed, but not to th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] fromfile

2002-02-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
> >> Declude just looks for a exact match << > >How about an IP whitelist? > >Will > > WHITELIST IP 127.0.0.1 > >ALSO imply that 127.0.0.10 - 19 and 100 - 199 are whitelisted? Yes, that is correct. >If so, how do whitelist single digit host addresses (such as the above .1).

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] fromfile

2002-02-27 Thread John Shacklett
That makes sense. I was thinking about the question that was posed the other day about having a foreign domains test, so I made a fromfile list of foreign top-level domains. But .co for Colombia catches all of the .com addresses. Back to the drawing board. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] fromfile

2002-02-27 Thread Andy Schmidt
>> Declude just looks for a exact match << How about an IP whitelist? Will WHITELIST IP 127.0.0.1 ALSO imply that 127.0.0.10 - 19 and 100 - 199 are whitelisted? If so, how do whitelist single digit host addresses (such as the above .1). Best Regards Andy Schmidt H&M Syst

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Nice
This explains it - the return address is different than the From: address. Thanks. - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist > No, it is not case sens

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] fromfile

2002-02-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
>If I put in "example.co" or even just ".co", will it still block mail from >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Yes, it will. >I think I read this to mean there was an implied >wildcard to the left of whatever is listed, but not to the right; is this a >correct interpretation? There are no wildcards. Declu

[Declude.JunkMail] fromfile

2002-02-27 Thread John Shacklett
I read this: "First, you need to create a text file that lists one address or domain per line, followed by the reason for blocking it. For example, "@example.com This domain sends spam." or "[EMAIL PROTECTED] This guy was mailbombing us". To block a domain, you can either use the format "@example

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.41 released

2002-02-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have just released Declude v1.41 (beta). This adds a %CR% variable that can be used anywhere in Declude JunkMail where variables are allowed, and will get replaced with a newline character (CRLF). -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://ww

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist

2002-02-27 Thread Smart Business Lists
Scott, Mike - I've had this happen also. When I investigated it appeared that I had inadvertently left some white space on the end of my WHITELIST address. I removed the white space and it appears to have worked since. Terry Fritts Wednesday, February 27, 2002 you wrote: >>Recently, 2 messag

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist

2002-02-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Recently, 2 messages from a WHITELIST FROM address were held. Did you check the IMail SMTP file (or the headers of the E-mail, if you use the XSENDER option) to see what the return address was, and see if that matched the whitelist? > Do an tests override a WHITELIST FROM setting? No. The

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Nice
Recently, 2 messages from a WHITELIST FROM address were held. Do an tests override a WHITELIST FROM setting? Is the WHITELIST FROM case sensitive? Thanks, Mike --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declu

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Antivirus & Declude Junkmail

2002-02-27 Thread David Stavert
I have the IMail AV software but have not installed it yet. I am running both Declude AV and JM. I will install it this weekend and test it a bit. Let you know what I see. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesd

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Antivirus & Declude Junkmail

2002-02-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
>>Is anyone using Imail Antivirus and Declude Junkmail? Are there any known >>problems if the two are running together? > >We've got a lot of people running both together, and haven't heard of any >issues running both together (although if anyone does know of any issues, >please speak up). Ou

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop

2002-02-27 Thread Smart Business Lists
Ken, Tuesday, February 26, 2002 you wrote: KL> My only comment is SPAMCOPS seem a bit high at 10, although they KL> are good, it is too easy for a good mail server to be listed by a KL> jerk user with an ax to grind. I agree. We had an incident we had to investigate yesterday just like this. A