Ok guys...
What would be the best way for me to block stuff Like this... but let legit
things thru... emails that have bad headers... ( we have one customer that
gets jokes from a list .. but the list has bad headers... so if I block bad
headers.. the emails dont get thru)
--
Might be easier to make a seperate test that uses regular expression test.
This would give us more control, and we could build more complex whitelist
and blacklist entries. Just a thought.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]O
Why not remove the 'internal' wildcards and force users to specify them
with '?' and '*'?
--
Regards,
Terrence Koeman
Technical Director/Administrator
MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.nl)
Please quote all replies in correspondence.
- -Original Message-
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [m
Hello R.,
Wednesday, February 27, 2002, 14:46:39 PM, you wrote:
>>If I put in "example.co" or even just ".co", will it still block mail from
>>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
RSP> Yes, it will.
>>I think I read this to mean there was an implied
>>wildcard to the left of whatever is listed, but not to th
> >> Declude just looks for a exact match <<
>
>How about an IP whitelist?
>
>Will
>
> WHITELIST IP 127.0.0.1
>
>ALSO imply that 127.0.0.10 - 19 and 100 - 199 are whitelisted?
Yes, that is correct.
>If so, how do whitelist single digit host addresses (such as the above .1).
That makes sense. I was thinking about the question that was posed the other
day about having a foreign domains test, so I made a fromfile list of
foreign top-level domains. But .co for Colombia catches all of the .com
addresses. Back to the drawing board.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
>> Declude just looks for a exact match <<
How about an IP whitelist?
Will
WHITELIST IP 127.0.0.1
ALSO imply that 127.0.0.10 - 19 and 100 - 199 are whitelisted?
If so, how do whitelist single digit host addresses (such as the above .1).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Syst
This explains it - the return address is different than the From: address.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist
> No, it is not case sens
>If I put in "example.co" or even just ".co", will it still block mail from
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
Yes, it will.
>I think I read this to mean there was an implied
>wildcard to the left of whatever is listed, but not to the right; is this a
>correct interpretation?
There are no wildcards. Declu
I read this:
"First, you need to create a text file that lists one address or domain per
line, followed by the reason for blocking it. For example, "@example.com
This domain sends spam." or "[EMAIL PROTECTED] This guy was mailbombing
us". To block a domain, you can either use the format "@example
We have just released Declude v1.41 (beta). This adds a %CR% variable that
can be used anywhere in Declude JunkMail where variables are allowed, and
will get replaced with a newline character (CRLF).
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://ww
Scott, Mike -
I've had this happen also.
When I investigated it appeared that I had inadvertently left some
white space on the end of my WHITELIST address. I removed the
white space and it appears to have worked since.
Terry Fritts
Wednesday, February 27, 2002 you wrote:
>>Recently, 2 messag
>Recently, 2 messages from a WHITELIST FROM address were held.
Did you check the IMail SMTP file (or the headers of the E-mail, if you use
the XSENDER option) to see what the return address was, and see if that
matched the whitelist?
> Do an tests override a WHITELIST FROM setting?
No. The
Recently, 2 messages from a WHITELIST FROM address were held.
Do an tests override a WHITELIST FROM setting?
Is the WHITELIST FROM case sensitive?
Thanks,
Mike
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declu
I have the IMail AV software but have not installed it yet. I am running
both Declude AV and JM. I will install it this weekend and test it a bit.
Let you know what I see.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesd
>>Is anyone using Imail Antivirus and Declude Junkmail? Are there any known
>>problems if the two are running together?
>
>We've got a lot of people running both together, and haven't heard of any
>issues running both together (although if anyone does know of any issues,
>please speak up).
Ou
Ken,
Tuesday, February 26, 2002 you wrote:
KL> My only comment is SPAMCOPS seem a bit high at 10, although they
KL> are good, it is too easy for a good mail server to be listed by a
KL> jerk user with an ax to grind.
I agree.
We had an incident we had to investigate yesterday just like this. A
17 matches
Mail list logo