Can DSBL be used with Declude yet? If so, what are the configuration
lines?
Wow -- I just went to their site about 15 minutes ago, hoping they would
have the zone information available now, and somehow missed it.
Yes, it can work with Declude. You can add the following lines to your
Is the expected future use of DSBL along the lines of:
For each mail server that connects to my server, my server will send tests
messages (with the properly formatted DSBL header) to the DSBL email address
through the server that connected to me. Then if the server is a open
relay, it will get
Hi,
As it turns out, the mail server in question is NOT one of mine.
So many blocks of addresses are subdivided these days, that to include
an entire Block of Class C addresses shows a lack of technical
judgement.
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Is the expected future use of DSBL along the lines of:
For each mail server that connects to my server, my server will send tests
messages (with the properly formatted DSBL header) to the DSBL email address
through the server that connected to me. Then if the server is a open
relay, it will
I have my IMail set to Relay for local hosts only
To make sure that you are not an open relay, you can either use IMail's
Relay for addresses (in which case you would enter a list of safe IP
addresses that your users may come from; anyone not coming from those safe
IPs would need to use SMTP
thanks!
I have done this
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/02 10:21AM
Please see:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-JB02.htm
about relay options. Particularly the paragraph that reads:
Note that only 'No Mail Relay' or 'Relay for Addresses' can prevent
unauthorized relaying by
thanks Scott
Yes, I have the Hijack in place and it is saying 2 got relayed ;)
I have now gone to the No relay option
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/02 10:23AM
I have my IMail set to Relay for local hosts only
To make sure that you are not an open relay, you can either use IMail's
Relay
I know this is slightly off-topic for here, but has anyone
had problems with entering subnet masks in the Relay for
addresses? When I enter individual IP addresses here, the server
works fine, requiring SMTP AUTH for anyone not connection from one of the
listed IP's. However when I enter our
[NOTE: Your mail server [65.204.98.70] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All
Internet hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing
reverse DNS entry will cause your mail to be treated as spam on some
servers, such as AOL.]
Speaking of the 2 got relayed and HiJack. What exactly
Along the lines of Hijack, I still occasionally get customers complaining of
mail disappearing when the send to a large number of recipients in a single
email, usually in the order of 80 or more. I have a tough time convincing
customers to break up messages and it does not seem to be universal.
I know this is slightly off-topic for here, but has anyone had problems
with entering subnet masks in the Relay for addresses? When I enter
individual IP addresses here, the server works fine, requiring SMTP AUTH
for anyone not connection from one of the listed IP's. However when I
enter our
[NOTE: Your mail server [65.204.98.70] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
What is a good threshhold to use for both of the holds in
I have the top 64 IP's of a class C, so I was using 216.13.3.192 for both.
If you use 216.13.3.192 as the IP, and 255.255.255.192 as the netmask, it
should work.
A netmask should (except in the most unusual cases, such as if one person
got odd IPs in a given range whereas someone else got
oops. Sorry, that's what I meant. 216.13.3.192 for the IP
and 255.255.255.192 for the netmask, just as you said. When doing so, it
acted as an open relay to any connection.
At 01:17 PM 3/28/2002, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I
have the top 64 IP's of a class C, so I was using 216.13.3.192 for
both.
If
oops. Sorry, that's what I meant. 216.13.3.192 for the IP and
255.255.255.192 for the netmask, just as you said. When doing so, it acted
as an open relay to any connection.
Ah, that's not good. Unless there was an oversight somewhere, that sounds
like a bug in IMail.
I'm running 6.06. Can anyone else running 6.06 confirm this
behavior?
At 01:46 PM 3/28/2002, R. Scott Perry wrote:
oops.
Sorry, that's what I meant. 216.13.3.192 for the IP and 255.255.255.192
for the netmask, just as you said. When doing so, it acted as an open
relay to any connection.
Ah,
I have a
6.06 installation, and I have a combination of differently-sized subnets in my
local address table, and I have never seen this happen. For example, my IMail
server itself sits in a 255.255.255.240 netmask.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
As far as technical judgment goes we block entire class C's when the IP
comes from Asia. Ditto with eastern Europe. We watch domestic IPs and we
start null routing open relays on an IP by IP basis( an we notify the
abuse@) but I would say that 40% of the time we end up blocking the entire
class
:) Well I worked for Time Inc. but then we got bought. So I'm just a
stepchild of the Devil.
-Josh
- Original Message -
From: Chad Killion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Road Runner blocking email
Are the Declude log file entries going to reflect the new
17 character spool file names? Because, I have not seen
any thing longer than 8 characters in the log files so far.
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Hi,
like I said, way too many Class C's are subdivided to block the them.
In the case of DSL, a class C may be used for over 200 customers.
Blocking one Class C blocks and awful lot of people.
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Thursday, March 28,
Are the Declude log file entries going to reflect the new
17 character spool file names? Because, I have not seen
any thing longer than 8 characters in the log files so far.
Originally, the log file entries were hard-coded to only show the first 8
characters. The latest release, however,
22 matches
Mail list logo
