Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
We don't tell them, we just do it...delete it that is, what they don't know won't hurt them LOL! We just say..." hmmm, it must have got lost somewhere in never never land, " can't be bothered checking it, if it has a virus etc... it's deleted... tough luck! they don't buck it... - Original M

[Declude.JunkMail] Postini type interface for JunkMail?

2002-11-08 Thread Joe Wolf / CompuService
Has anyone tried to build an interface for JunkMail that allows users or domains to set their own junk mail settings? The Postini interfaces seems easy enough and there should be a way to tranlate that to JunkMail. Just a thought. -Joe --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FX Apps

2002-11-08 Thread eddie pang
Hi Karl, You may want to checkout http://www.iopus.com/beee.htm Its a neefty little program that will email a single file or a group of files in a subdirectory when its created. Its great for reports that take overnight to complete. eddie. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FX Apps

2002-11-08 Thread Tom
> That would be useful but in the meantime I wrote a little batch file that > runs delog, pauses (to let it complete) then renames the default text file > to the current date. It worked last night so now I am going to > have it move it to the spool directory. I would also like to have it email > me

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I've been playing with sniffer a bit, and one thing I have noticed is that it will catch many adult emails that do not fail any other declude tests and that have been getting through my current setup. The problem is that if I want to catch them, I have rely only on sniffer and put sniffer at a wei

RE: RE: RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread John Tolmachoff
Great. Please keep us posted on the progress. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail m

DSN:RE: RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi John, I am pretty sure you can be assured of that. We deal with a lot of small ISPs and hosting companies now and always try to keep value high and expense low. On 11/08/02 11:59am you wrote... >Hopefully, there will be a tiered pricing structure for smaller companies, >such as small hosting

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Bill B
We weight sniffer as a 12 and block at 15. This works very well for us. Bill -Original Message- From: "Trent M. Davenport" Sent: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 10:24:28 -0800 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence So, after seeing the last 2 months that message sniffer is around 90%

RE: RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread John Tolmachoff
>No, sorry. We don't do shareware here, although I don't know exactly how it will be distributed yet. Our marketing department is currently doing its evaluations. The 'real' target market is large ISPs, but we use IMail and Declude Junkmail here, so it was an obvious 'must do'. I understand. Hope

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Uhte, Russ
Weight17 --Sorry-- As far as people with misconfigured mail servers... That will NEVER happen... As long as there are company's trying to save money by hiring an incompetent admin, there will be misconfigured email servers...lol We don't sift through the messages that get routed, we just leave

Re: DSN:RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
I'd also be interested.  Porn spam is quite a problem . . when a little old lady uses her email just to keep in touch with the grandkids and gets "discovered" by spammers . . she tends to not be a happy camper.   Glenn Z.   - Original Message - From: Brian Milburn To: [

DSN:RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread Brian Milburn
No, sorry. We don't do shareware here, although I don't know exactly how it will be distributed yet. Our marketing department is currently doing its evaluations. The 'real' target market is large ISPs, but we use iMail and Declude Junkmail here, so it was an obvious 'must do'. On 11/08/02 11:27a

RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread John Tolmachoff
I also would be interested. Need to ask. Will this be a "shareware" or paid add-on? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com

RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread Danny Klopfer
I would be interested. Let me know when it is available. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Brian Milburn Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery If you a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Trent M. Davenport
What is it exactly that you do? A Weight of 7 or 17? I wish I had the manpower to sift through all the messages. Hopefully as SPAM blocking becomes more common, people with misconfigured mail servers will get them fixed so whitelists are not necessary. Trent --- Trent M. Davenport - Sys

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Webmaster - GlobalWeb.net
we too offer 2 levels - weight10 marks the subj with an indicator they can filter on - weight20 gets the email held;  the legit emails i have seen come across usually fail only sniffer, which has a physical weight in our system of only 5, so by itself, it doesn;t flag the lower level of our

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Uhte, Russ
Trent, That is exactly what we do... But we don't delete weight20, we route it to a mail box, that way if a customer calls, we can retrieve the email, look at all the test it failed, if it needs whitelisted, we can do that, and then forward the message on... We've had 0 problems with it!! -Russ

DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread Brian Milburn
If you are interested in a Declude 'external test' for adult oriented material, we will be releasing a product for Declude/iMail and other MTAs soon (CYBERsitter NoXMail). We adapted the content recognition engine from our product CYBERsitter, and it is extremely accurate and highly configurable.

[Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Trent M. Davenport
So, after seeing the last 2 months that message sniffer is around 90% accurate, what confidence has everyone put in it?  We offer our clients 2 levels of SPAM blocking.  Regular (using a WEIGHT20) and Aggressive (using a WEIGHT10).  Because we're an ISP, we have to be really careful about de

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread John Tolmachoff
>Is the late-lamented "never made it out of beta" ADULT test completely gone now? I am using it here. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declu

[Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread John Shacklett
Is the late-lamented "never made it out of beta" ADULT test completely gone now? -- John Shacklett www.continentaloffice.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why is it that if someone tells you there are 1 billion stars in the universe, you will believe them, but if someone tells you a wal

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FX Apps

2002-11-08 Thread Karl Hentschel
That would be useful but in the meantime I wrote a little batch file that runs delog, pauses (to let it complete) then renames the default text file to the current date. It worked last night so now I am going to have it move it to the spool directory. I would also like to have it email me a copy au

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] * and . blocking.

2002-11-08 Thread paul
> That is correct. :) > > Just the "@something.com" and ".something.com" will catch it all. YES I got something right! woo-hoo! Thanks Scott. This Declude is soo cool. Paul --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (h

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IPNOTINMX

2002-11-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
Before I do this please confirm my logic. Let's say I wanted to get more aggressive catching spam, and was willing to risk a possible increase in false positives. Could I adjust the IPNOTINMX default setting of -4 in the following way? IPNOTINMX ipnotinmx x x 0 -3 Yes, that would work fi

[Declude.JunkMail] IPNOTINMX

2002-11-08 Thread Keith Purtell
Before I do this please confirm my logic. Let's say I wanted to get more aggressive catching spam, and was willing to risk a possible increase in false positives. Could I adjust the IPNOTINMX default setting of -4 in the following way? IPNOTINMX ipnotinmx x x 0 -3 Keith Purtell, Web/Networ

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] * and . blocking.

2002-11-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
just curious, I'm going through my fromfile, taking out multiple entries, and notice addresses like @mail04.something.com. I have listed .something.com and @something.com. Is this correct? I'm assuming the @something will catch [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the .something.com will catch [EMAIL PROTE

[Declude.JunkMail] * and . blocking.

2002-11-08 Thread paul
Scott, just curious, I'm going through my fromfile, taking out multiple entries, and notice addresses like @mail04.something.com. I have listed .something.com and @something.com. Is this correct? I'm assuming the @something will catch [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the .something.com will catch [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] habeas

2002-11-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does the HABEAS test as implemented in Declude JunkMail query the Habeas Infringers List? No -- HIL is a standard ip4r test, and can be added to any version of Declude, by adding a line such as: HIL ip4r hil.habeas.com 127.0.0.2 5 0 to your global.cfg file. Note that there are

[Declude.JunkMail] habeas

2002-11-08 Thread Glen Ostgaard
Title: Message Does the HABEAS test as implemented in Declude JunkMail query the Habeas Infringers List?   If not, would we have to set it up in global.cfg as an ipr4 test?    Could it be run just for those emails with Habeas headers?     Information about the Habeas Infringers List.  htt