Sandy,
I have been working on basically the same thing. There is one thing that I
just really can not figure out how to do. How do you get the plan.ima file
to copy into the declude config directory? Right now I have just setup a
cgi
that the user has to click on to 'activate' their Spam
There is one thing that I just really can not figure out how to do.
How do you get the plan.ima file to copy into the declude config
directory?
I don't. I use REDIRECT.
-Sandy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Scott,
If an external test was the last one defined would the following work?
MYTEST external nonzero c:\mytest.exe %TESTSFAILED% 0 0
The reason is, I'm thinking about creating an app to plot the hit rate
for my tests, but I want to make it a data gatherer rather than a log
analyzer (spreads out
I was looking at the header of a suspected spam email, and it didn't have
any declude headers added. I thought this very strange so I looked at the
declude spam logs and found that the email had generated this error. Looks
like it sailed right through without getting looked at. Any idea why it
Looks good in the 2 minutes I had.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent:
If an external test was the last one defined would the following work?
MYTEST external nonzero c:\mytest.exe %TESTSFAILED% 0 0
Yes, that should work fine.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
I was looking at the header of a suspected spam email, and it didn't have
any declude headers added. I thought this very strange so I looked at the
declude spam logs and found that the email had generated this error. Looks
like it sailed right through without getting looked at. Any idea why it
So, the tests are run in the order defined in the Global.cfg?
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.
So, the tests are run in the order defined in the Global.cfg?
Not always. :)
For example, the IP-based tests (such as SPAMCOP) will run before other
external tests (even if it is the last one defined).
However, external tests are among a group of tests that are run last, and
if an
is it possible for a single user in a virtual domain to have a whitelist?
Michael Lauritzen
---
[This E-mail is scanned for viruses by Ucopian Networks Inc]
[http://www.ucopiannetworks.com]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
I am running version 1.64
I do not have an on-access scanner running nor am I running Hijack.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
OK, what is the general order by group of how the tests are run? (lpr4,
weight, external, fromfile, filter and such.)
Do you have a need to know, or are you just curious? It may take a lot of
time to come up with the exact order.
Would then tests within a group be run in the order found?
is it possible for a single user in a virtual domain to have a whitelist?
Not currently, but the next beta will allow for that.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
I am running version 1.64
I do not have an on-access scanner running nor am I running Hijack.
As 1.64 is a beta version, I would recommend upgrading to 1.65.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
good idea. I'll upgrade and keep ou posted if I see them again...
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Move/copy
Hi Scott:
The following header tripped SPAMROUTING.
However,
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=192.67.198.73 is located in
Karlsruhe, Germany
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=217.72.192.180 is located in
Karlsruhe, Germany
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=192.67.198.73 is located in
Karlsruhe, Germany
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=217.72.192.180 is located in
Karlsruhe, Germany
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=145.254.191.86 is located in
Eschborn, Germany.
So there is no funny
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=grepel.de
results in:
[ERROR: The root servers say that the domain grepel.de does not have any NS
records (although they may have some other information on that zone). I can
not do a DNS report on a hostname (such as mail.example.com) or a domain
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=grepel.de
results in:
[ERROR: The root servers say that the domain grepel.de does not have any NS
records (although they may have some other information on that zone). I can
not do a DNS report on a hostname (such as mail.example.com) or a
Hi Scott,
sorry - that reply just makes no sense:
a) When a DNS server returns a SOA record in response to a query, it
means that the queried resource doesn't exist.
No - in this case it means I specifically INSTRUCTED NSLOOKUP to return the
SOA as my sample showed:
set type=soa
b) If
Dan,
server dns.denic.de.
set type=a
www.grepel.de.
Server: dns.denic.de
Address: 194.246.96.79
Name:www.grepel.de
Address: 192.67.198.4
Seems to me, as if it's resolving just fine?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
sorry - that reply just makes no sense:
a) When a DNS server returns a SOA record in response to a query, it
means that the queried resource doesn't exist.
No - in this case it means I specifically INSTRUCTED NSLOOKUP to return the
SOA as my sample showed:
set type=soa
Why were you
Hm,
okay, I begin to understand that DNSREPORT/DNSSTUFF is having trouble
dealing with the DNS information - but I can tell you TWO things with
confidence:
a) Internet Explorer with the Windows Resolver CAN resolve:
http://www.grepel.de/
b) IMAIL with Windows DNS CAN deliver mail to
[EMAIL
okay, I begin to understand that DNSREPORT/DNSSTUFF is having trouble
dealing with the DNS information
G
You're wrong here. Those sites are behaving 100% correctly.
- but I can tell you TWO things with
confidence:
a) Internet Explorer with the Windows Resolver CAN resolve:
For example, the IP-based tests (such as SPAMCOP) will run
before other
external tests (even if it is the last one defined).
Even if it's not good for statistical purposes, what do you think about
a new parameter stop_on_hold=true/false wich will stop any further
(external, ressource
Hi Scott:
Thanks, turning DEBUG on helped understanding your explanation.
It appears as if DENIC is setting up domains they host themselves as
hosts in their own .DE zone, instead of as zones. Hard to imagine that
the zone of a major industrial country would be so terribly mismanaged... -
but
While your web sites operate correctly, it may be something you have to keep
in mind when testing for the existence of domains in Declude. (Although I
believe, you always look for A and MX records, so even this quirky
configuration in the .DE namespace would still work.)
Fortunately, Declude
I am not so sure about the usefulness of that. While some may
like it, others will not. Here is why
Yes you're right. There is also to say that normaly only about 5 to 20%
of all messages are spam. So the other 80 - 95% of all messages should
never reach the hold value (and therefore run
28 matches
Mail list logo
