Jeff, the problem is everything does not work perfectly, as most likely
every version has a problem with gmail and earthlink and weblists headers.
This includes version 2.0 whatever.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hanging on the new licensing routines?
This is why I never run stuff in production till it's "old" and tested.
Jonathan
At 11:30 PM 2/1/2005, you wrote:
I had the same problem today while installing v2.0. All Declude functions
stopped. I called them and went back to the old version and everything
I had the same problem today while installing v2.0. All Declude functions
stopped. I called them and went back to the old version and everything works
perfect, just like before.
I'm glad to see it wasn't just me.
Jeff Kratka
-- Original Message --
From:
I had the same problem. The declude.exe is about 1/2 of the size as the one
it replaced.
I emailed support but I imagine they are fixing it, I have not heard back
from them..
Don Hickey
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you must have the default files in there proper place.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 6:51 PM
> T
The $default$.junkmail in the root of the Declude folder is what is used for
domains that do not have a $default$.junkmail file in their folder. So the
answer is yes you should have that file in there.
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com f
As I was browsing through my dec### logs I've come across the following
error messages.
01/19/2005 00:58:28 Q0500046d00f056d1 ERROR: Could not open
C:\IMAIL\Declude\$default$.junkmail. Does it exist?
01/19/2005 00:58:28 Q0500046d00f056d1 ERROR: Could not load any config file
for @.
I don't ha
In my case, I had downloaded the "Full" version last nightI agree
that the version numbers should be changing or it will become more
difficult to resolve problems for all of us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
S
That is another problem in the growing list:
How do you know what version you have?
Both of them showed version 2.0. Wasn't the beta 2.0b? if so, then that
means the released version predates the beta version.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
I ave the same problem and have reverted to the previous 2.0 version.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:58 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Dec
The latest version does not work at all, nothing, zilch, zippo.
This is a disgrace.
Downloaded and copied into the imail directory and ran "declude -diag" and
all I got was the declude version line and then a line saying Imail
configuration then several seconds and then back to a prompt.
No outp
I working a routing
to process the log files for declude. The ultimate goal is to produce
statitics and graphs based on the information from the log files. I
checked the manual and the descripiton for the various log formats is
vague.
WARN (This is in the
current global.cfg, but I see
Hmmm...still would prefer to augment the functionality in Declude...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 Beta
All this and more is available via SpamAssassin. You m
All this and more is available via SpamAssassin. You may want to look at
Sandy's SA plug-in to Declude, or possibly look at setting up SA on a
Linux/Postfix/Amavisd-New/Sniffer gateway.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005
Hi Darrell,
I already have RegExp white and blacklists, just want the ability to handle
pattern matching against just the from address.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Declud
MessageCertainly did...hopefully provide an impetus towards adding new >features and tests to Junkmaillike SURBL, and other requested features >like better pattern matching for black/whitelist files.
I know this is not what you wan't to hear at this exact moment, but I have
an external applica
Sandy,
Thats how I read it as well.
Darrell
Sanford Whiteman writes:
Are you sure this is against SURBL. The way that is wrote indicates
that it could potentially be against something that they (Imail)
maintains.
I'm sure it's not against SURBL, but just against their existing
hy
Darrell:
Very valid points! I may have spoken too soon...
Now that I re-read this, I agree - the way it is written does make it sounds
as if it may be some internal table and as if this may be limited to
plain-text.
If you hunch is true that would render this pretty worthless.
Best Regards
An
Title: Message
Certainly did...hopefully provide an
impetus towards adding new features and tests to Junkmaillike
SURBL, and other requested features like better pattern matching for
black/whitelist files.
One problem we run into daily is the inability to
handle whitelisting of major n
> Are you sure this is against SURBL. The way that is wrote indicates
> that it could potentially be against something that they (Imail)
> maintains.
I'm sure it's not against SURBL, but just against their existing
hyperlink normalizer and blacklist.
--Sandy
-
Yep, Declude really dropped the ball with their lack of URIBL support in
their latest release.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 Beta
Don't know if everyone saw that.
L
Looks as if for once, Imail may actually 'beat' Declude by supporting SURBL > natively.
o Ability to detect hyperlinks in plain text emails and check them against
the spam URL blacklist table.
Andy,
Are you sure this is against SURBL. The way that is wrote indicates that it
could potentially b
I'm confused about the release of 2.0. I received 2 emails from Barry
making annoucements and then 2 emails immediately following which recalled
the announcements. (?)
I believe the 2 "recalls" were both for the first message.
Is 2.0 for IMail ready?
Yes, it is.
Title: Message
Don't know if
everyone saw that.
Looks as if for
once, Imail may actually 'beat' Declude by supporting
SURBL natively.
I'm curious if
they'll at least do SOME of those checks (such as SPF) during the SMTP session -
instead of accepting mail first.
New Features In Ver
Yep...it's the same as default.junkmail, and applies to outgoing mail.
I may be wrong, but I don't believe you can have incoming on and outgoing
off by domain. Either both on or both off.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Vanderzand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, Febr
Just went through the manual on this and there is not much explanation
I see the section in global.cfg for outgoing.
It looks the same as the junkmail filters for users and domains.
Is this section applicable to all outgoing mail?
Can outgoing mail be filtered by domain?
> -Original Mess
I'm confused about the release of 2.0. I received 2 emails from Barry making
annoucements and then 2 emails immediately following which recalled the
announcements. (?)
Is 2.0 for IMail ready? ( I didn't do the beta either for the same reasons
as Andy and John T about the install stuff. In fact,
The fix is in the current 2.0 download from the web site.
Barry Simpson
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:33 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declu
Same here. This is the first beta I had not tested, after other experienced
issues related to the new "setup" and I just didn't see any communication
that sounded like others had successfully adopted.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
--
If you have JM Pro and have the outgoing actions defined in your Global.CFG,
then yes.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Vanderzand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:17 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SMTP relay question
I have client who relay their
I have client who relay their mail thorough me
As I am filtering their incoming mail for spam I have always assumed that I
am filtering their outgoing mail also.
Is the outgoing mail checked for spam automatically or is there a setting
for that?
I have just taken on another client with this set
FYI, I did not use the beta as the new version and process left me a little
skeptical.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Tuesday, Feb
And the fix will be when and in what form?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 4:31 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail
Declude runs as a gateway to any SMTP
compliant mail system. I have it Running as a gateway in front of
GourpWise
Exchange 2000 and 2003
Smartermail
IMail
Lotus Notes
The backend mail system really has no
bearing on the performance/ability of Declude with the exception of a co
Hello,
Have somebody install declude JM MS exchange?
If somebody has install it to MS exchange what kind
of experience of it. Is it working fine or lot of troubles ?
- Tommi
so you think something like
filename="=?
shouldn't appear in a legal mail?
that would give us the opportunity to filter for camouflaged attachmentnames.
It *should* be illegal in legitimate E-mail, from what I can tell. But it
is possible that legitimate E-mails may be sent out that way for some
There appears to be a problem in version 2.0 where Declude is seeing the
first character after the word subject as the start of the subject line. The
first character is a colon and followed by a space and then the actual
subject line.
You are correct. I'm surprised this didn't get caught during t
There appears to be a problem in version 2.0 where Declude is seeing the
first character after the word subject as the start of the subject line. The
first character is a colon and followed by a space and then the actual
subject line.
Log lines and headers sent to support.
John Tolmachoff
Enginee
38 matches
Mail list logo
