Local to local does not require authentication.
If you look at the logs or the Q file, I bet Imail treats it as such and
either does not add the authentication line to the Q file.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
My program MATCH might help. It looks at the To address and the From
address, and they are both listed in the respective text files, it returns a
"fail" which you could then weight at say -100.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Origina
Open your sender.eml with notepad, then copy and paste into a new text
document.
Outlook treats this as an attached e-mail and messes with it.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:De
> > Keith, you have good stories.
>
> I'm a novice in a group like this.
You must be doing something right to get MS to send an Engineer out to you.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
> >Is there a way to have a action of moving a D and Q file to a specified
> >folder, (not a mailbox.) something like the ROUTETO action?
>
> Do you mean a directory on the hard drive (that's why we had to rename the
> FOLDER action to MAILBOX)? We're planning to change the HOLD action to
> speci
That is the big gotcha with whitelisting.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Kratka
> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 4:1
> My feeling is that once you achieve moderate success with Declude, each
> successive step is that much harder to make.
Remember the old adage: 20% effort for 80% result and 80% effort for the
remaining 20% result, if obtainable at all.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices F
Is there a way to have a action of moving a D and Q file to a specified
folder, (not a mailbox.) something like the ROUTETO action?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declu
Any one have an updated list to share?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
To continue the discussion on encoded subject lines, the ones I see as spam
always have a short body and is always HTML like the following: (Without the
extra spaces I through in there.
< html > < body >
< cen te r> < !--pfuhja2jjk-- > < a href="http : //www . currency4.com
/host/d efault.asp?I D=
How about one similar to SUBJECTSPACES but counts the number of characters
other than numbers and letters and spaces?
This would include _ - = + ? > < and so forth.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
ecution
> (824146) Posted September 10, 2003
>
> It's working fine on all other servers that we manage.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 11:15 AM
> >
I've enabled and
> > disabled Declude a dozen times with the same result. We're
> > using 1.75.
> >
> > Tomorrow morning I'm going to spend a couple of hours with
> > the server offline looking deeper into the problem. It's
> > difficult to real
> Note the conspicuously missing Declude headers. Any idea what would be
> causing Declude to not add it's headers to this persons messages? Scott,
if
> you would like me to run debug logging, I can, but who know how long
before
> this person posts to the list again.
Do you have Imgate striping
I believe all tests are still run, just no action taken.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
> Sent: Friday, Septem
Since Declude has nothing to do with messages being received or sent from
the server, or POP3 service and such, how could disabling Declude affect
this?
What version of Declude.exe are you using?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Orig
When ever I see this in the header, it is associated with a legit
newsletter.
Any one see the same, or see spam with this header?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declud
L PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cautionary note on BASE64
>
> Thanks Andrew for the update.
>
> I wonder i
Thanks Andrew for the update.
I wonder if this behavior has been changed in Exchange 2003?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Co
In your examples, I only see 4 that would be FP under this, the ones from
microsoft.com, unitiedmedia.com, yahoo groups, and Travelocity.com.
newsletters.microsoft.com is already in a whitefilter.
Yahoo groups are already in a whitefilter for known problems.
Travelocity is a legit company, and the
OK, my suggested weights are too high.
Remember, the point of this test is to be used in the weighting system only.
Pagers have 10 numbers, so I would actually start at either 11 or 15.
An old CompuServe address will most likely not be failing other tests to
where this one would put it over. Ho
Any thoughts, good or bad?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09
I am sure I can do this but thought I would ask:
SUBJECTSPACES1 subjectspaces 15 x x 10 0
SUBJECTSPACES2 subjectspaces 30 x x 10 0
Any message with 30 or more spaces would get a weight of 20 added, correct?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
How about a test like this:
NUMBERSINMAILFROM
It would be similar to SUBJECTSPACES but would count the amount of numbers
in the mail from address. You could then configure it for say if 10 or more,
add 5 to the weight and so forth.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices F
I asked this question a few days ago.
If test is not going to have a action configured for it, you can omit it.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTE
Sharyn, if your DNS server is on the same box as Imail, set it up to use
127.0.0.1, not the public IP address.
Also, flush the cache on both Imail DNS cache and the W2K DNS.
Have you checked to see if the W2K DNS is passing both tests?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For
It appears that the DNS server is not responding.
Whos is it?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:18 AM
I would actually think that this should be an configuration option in Imail,
where if you wanted to, each incoming message, if to more than one recipient
on the local server, would be separated.
In other words, if Imail received a message destined to 3 people on the
server, instead of creating one
> A feature that delays incoming mail from unfamiliar (new) source IPs would
> allow heuristic tests (like Message Sniffer) and rbls time to add coding
> for the messages before processing them. That is, if the connecting IP is
> unknown then Declude could park the message in a folder for some amou
Question, if a test is defined for use in weighting only, and no action will
be performed based on that test, does it have to be listed in the
$default$.junkmail and action portion of Global.cfg?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E
Note: To report any issues, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: U
X-UIDL: 362788298
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
September 05, 2003 9:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Warnings in HJ log
>
> Are those the full headers? They do not include any Received: headers.
> -Scott
>
> At 12:46 PM 9/5/2003, John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) wrote:
>
Here is the header: (Retrieved from the Exchange log of the recipient)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 00:09:47 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Postmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sub
I am seeing this warning on messages that Declude creates using the
postmaster.eml file for virus notifications.
Is this do to the message ID problem with IMail's mail1.exe?
09/05/2003 00:09:47 Q2967f2315dc Warning: Could not find IP3 end on first
line of datafile (bound)?
09/05/2003 00:09:47 Q29
It is known that AOL, Hotmail and Yahoo will often fail NOABUSE,
NOPOSTMASTER and REVDNS, as they are not setup nor do they care.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I kind of have mixed feelings about a post like this.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Marquardt
> Sent: Thursday, Septe
b One Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://astra1.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
> (Lists)
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
> So, just a general question, does it appear to anyone else that the
> challenge/response software at the consumer level, contributes to the
level
> of spam anyone is receiving?
It is not really SPAM. (Well, sort of.)
It is the software trying to send a message to the from address for
validation
You would need to block it before Imail receives it.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James R. Skivers
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:19 AM
To: [E
> Actually, it could be a minor change to the processing -- at the
> $default$.junkmaillevel, rather than Global.cfg -- as this is not a
> "test", but a handling of the test results. It would mean order
dependence,
> usually (or the processing of combining tests done first, then other
> handl
> No, assuming that the "CATCHALLMAILS catchallmails x x 0 0" line is in
> there (it is in the default config file).
By default, it is commented out, no?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude V
> >Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other
> >specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and
> >BADHEADERS would fail "HELOHEAD" and have x number of points
> >added/deducted to it?
>
> No, that is not possible. It is something that has been requested, but
> Copy the new tests that I want to use to the old file?
That would probably be best, as replacing the file would undo any tweaks you
have done for your situation.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses b
> There is a new "PREWHITELIST ON" option that will run some of the
> whitelists before the tests are run.
Can you explain the "some" part?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://w
Sharyn, I am a little surprised. You usually keep up on things.
Guess you have not seen any of the posts regarding OSRelay in the last 2
weeks?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAI
Configure a filter test looking for body words and HOLD on that test.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
> Sent: Mo
. Maybe it would be better just to write a Hello
World script instead and watch some TV with my spare time...
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
I think you hit the nail on the head on the differences on how this is to bedone. Some want to be able to load on the same machine not using IIS, so
I think you hit the nail on the head on the differences on how this is to be
done.
Some want to be able to load on the same machine not using IIS, some want
IIS.
Some want to be able to load on a different machine not using IIS, some want
IIS.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServi
Entire log for that message please, not just a snippet. That does not show
total weight or final action and such.
What is your loglevel at?
You might want to send a copy of the message, with full headers, and your
Global.cfg file to Scott or someone else like me off list to further review
it.
Jo
Have you checked the log?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of serge
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
OTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
> (Lists)
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AUTO Whitelist question
>
>
> Unless you send e-mail to your self, your e-mail address will not be
liste
Unless you send e-mail to your self, your e-mail address will not be listed
in your file.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keit
> If the AUTOWHITE from John how much is it? I don't see a price on his
> website.
It is in the information.pdf.
Standard, $75
Professional, $175
Enterprise, Pending
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruse
Please note, there are 2 different items:
AUTOWHITELIST is a Declude JunkMail option.
AutoWhite for Declude is a 3rd party add on.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declu
Number of spam messages not caught has gone up since the tests went down.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail m
http://www.eservicesforyou.com/products/autowhite.html
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
626-737-6003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Fou
Have you tried opening one in notepad?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of serge
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:36 PM
> To: [E
f so, why?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
> >
> > -- Original Message ------
> > From: "John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:03
Please see the link to the archives in my earlier post on this.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bill.maillists
> Sent: Thursda
Yes, many of us are using Alligate.
Please see the discussion from last week:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10255.html
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declu
You do not want Declude to stop at a certain
point. What if it stops, right before the next test which is a whitefilter type
test?
With the weighting system, it is
important to run all tests to get the final weight.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For
Yes, this has been reported both on Imail list and this list at 08/24.
news.prodigy.com
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck S
Check what ftp server you are connecting to.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7
Yes, Declude Virus does this. Declude Virus is fired before Declude JM.
It is checked in this order by default:
Imail SMTP security
Declude Virus virus scan
Declude Virus banned extension
Declude Virus vulnerabilities
Declude JM
Imail Rules
Delivery
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
The problem is when it comes to notifications
and requeing. If a message gets stopped by banned extension first, and it is
infected, you are going to be sending out a notice to the recipient of the
blocked message. He is going to tell you hey, I know that send, and such and
you are going t
Lets see here. There is a way to do this.
Setup a filter:
MAILFROM50 ENDSWITHdomain.com
Then use program MATCH.
In the from file, list all valid addresses.
In the too file, list only @domain.com
Give the test a weight of -50.
Then, any message listed as a from address wi
That line sounds like part of the generic otherpostmaster.eml file, and
therefore is probably a Declude user. Post the full headers, or send off
list so we can pursue this and get this person to fix it.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
>
Actually, F-Prot was catching Sobig.F
almost immediately from reports on the list on Tuesday. McAfee was the lager
this time.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
That is not possible at this time with Declude, and has been discussed. Some
other tests maybe be looking at the ability to do that.
However, while the concept is interesting, your example has the potential to
delete legits.
The reason is taking action based on blacklisted keywords can be dangero
> I don't want to knock Alligate, it has some nice functionality,
> especially when used without Declude (auto whitelisting and digest
> notification), and it does what it says, but it has a relatively high
> false positive rate in the default configuration and therefore it can't
> be scored higher
As one of the earlier testers and helped develop the variable scale of
Alligate, I can understand your position. I have a client that gets a lot of
e-mail from the Far East and a lot of bcc broadcasts and lists. Many of
these show elements of spam, but are legit. That is what makes it hard.
There
[Declude.JunkMail] Alligate
>
> Hi,
>
> Is Alligate so good ? What about false positive ?
>
> Thanks
> Mehdi Blagui
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de John Tolmachoff (Li
Do you mean as a Declude ONLY test?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:18 PM
> To
Title: Message
Kami, you have already used up your
quota of Mondays for the month of August. One more, and you get 50 lashes with
a wet noodle.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMA
Seems like that would be dependent on the timing of the test order and when
that line was added.
Scott, can a variable be used in a filter with an equation like this:
HEADER 0 CONTAINS %REVDNS%=64.214.161.171
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
y, August 06, 2003 1:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ebay and Spamdomians
>
> What is the LA?
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednes
I have Declude send out a vulnerablility.eml message. If the receiver
recognizes it, he replies and I put the files back into the spool folder
letting them know to have the sender fix the problem.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Orig
You probably mean it is catching the multi-part attachments that the sender
has his Outlook configured incorrectly to use.
Explain to the sender not to have Outlook break up attachments.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Messa
> What do you mean "AutoWhitelist"? Is this a declude product or custom
script?
I think he is referring to the add-on product for Declude JunkMail.
www.eservicesforyou.com/products/autowhite.html
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[Thi
ility.eml message.
>
> Thanks
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:31 PM
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Virus Pro and Fprot (DOS)
>
>
> I h
Sending messages from a hotmail address but not through a hotmail server may
not be allowed under the LA.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Imail SMTP security
Imail Kill list
Declude Virus
Declude JM
Imail Rules
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Forsyth
> Sent:
1. If you want no e-mail going out, configure Imail SMTP to send all via a
smart host, then point it at 127.0.0.1.
2. My program match can be used along with catchallmails in JM.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> I realize that a lot of e-mail goes to the spam folder that is addressed
to
> non-existent (or not-anymore-existent) addresses. Is there any reason, why
> Declude does not check the recipient's name before doing other tests?
> Wouldn't it be better to return e-mail to non exiistent addresses inst
> It's become blatantly apparent that there is a VERY STRONG NEED for an
> application such as this. Are the Declude people listening?
With all the work that Scott and his "interms" do, I think this is perfectly
fine.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesfo
> Let me guess...the mode of transportation will be a short wheel base,
> Diamond T w/Browning 4X4 tranny and no trailer!
Ah, there you are Jim. ;) But is has to have a chain drive.
> There is something down though that is affecting a lot opf people.
Network
> Solutions have 4 DNS servers that ar
> I don't want to go home, I want a vacation!
Dear Mr. Sheldon Koehler;
It is with great pleasure that I can announce that you are hereby granted an
official vacation.
You MUST take this vacation immediately, or forfeit the right to use it
forever.
To claim your official vacation, you must call
I am not here. Your message was not delivered. Everyone went home.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
> Sent: Thur
Here is what I am now doing to fight
problems with DNS servers going down.
I have installed DNS on the Imail
server. It has no zones and answers queries only from Imail and Declude. I have
set Imail DNS server to 127.0.0.1. I have then configured 4 forwarders in the
DNS server propertie
Title: Message
Morning Kami.
Hate to differ, but I disagree, as I am
sure others will, on using RAID 5 for mail boxes. The mail boxes are heavy Read
AND Write. RAID 5 will slow performance in heavy write usage. RAID 5 is best
and shines the greatest in mainly Read situations, like dat
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude using 50% cpu
BTW, with an average CPU usage of 44%
before Declude, you may be reaching the saturation point of the server. Not
critical, but from my understanding if average CPU usage is at 50%, you need to
start looking at things.
John Tolmac
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude using 50% cpu
Where is your DNS server you are using
in Imail?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Will ROUTETO work to an external domain that is one not held on Imail?
Example: Message addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sfdomain.com is not hosted
on Imail, but Imail is doing S&F for it.
That message triggers a test called SFDOMAINREROUTE with a ROUTETO action to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Again, sfdomain
> >Does the path to the text file need to be in quotes?
>
> No.
>
> The only time quotes are required (or can be used properly) is in external
> tests.
What if there is a space in either the directory name or the file name?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.ese
What do the log files say? Do they indicate a connection?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of i360
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
At this time, all updates would be routed through one person to update
manually.
If there is a better way...
BTW, if someone has a better way and wants to maintain it, but has no server
available, it can be done on mine.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservic
> RL> Do you think that we can move the Declude list to yahoo for the
following
I veto (if I had that authority) any such idea or move.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.d
I have had the intent but not the time. I am willing to host it. In fact, I
already have it set up just need the documents to include.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Ju
Are you using the PERCENT test?
They are using something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]@domain.com.
From the JunkMail manual:
PERCENT
This test will catch all mail with "To:"
addresses that contain a percent sign. The percent sign indicates an outdated
routing method
> Yea, and expose my server's security to fix some GUI issue?
> Sounds like Ipswitch should provide a maintenance release for v6.0 users
> to eradicate this problem.
Uh, trying reading through the many posts in the archives on the Imail
forum. This is the Declude JunkMail list. The pros and cons h
901 - 1000 of 1113 matches
Mail list logo
