RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Paul Navarre
***
Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost
leader/not a revenue builder.
 
If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus
protection?
***

Is this a serious question?

If you don't offer spam and virus filtering, you won't have any customers.
In most markets the local competition offers it for free. The national
competition certainly does (yahoo, google, earthlink etc).

Many of us are fighting against low-priced inferior competition. The problem
is that the average customer doesn't know that they are inferior. They *do*
know how much they charge, and if they offer spam/virus protection and you
don't it doesn't matter how poor the other guy's service is. They will
leave. Sure, they will find out later how much the other guys suck, but how
much time/effort/money will it cost to get them back? Chances are they'll
try the next cut rate place instead of coming back to us anyway.

Paul Navarre



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklisted by Comcast

2006-01-11 Thread Paul Navarre
  For whatever reason, one of my mail servers has been blacklisted by
  Comcast.snip
  Anybody have any deas how to resolve this one?

This just happened to me too.

The answer is in your log files. Comcast inserts a message in the data
conversation that says to send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting removal from their
blacklist along with your server's IP address. I was off in their list in
about 5 hours. I wish I could find out *why* I was on their list, but I'll
take what I can get.

Paul Navarre



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Paul Navarre








Ive actually noticed an increase
specifically in gambling site spam myself.



Paul Navarre











Has anyone noticed in the past week an increase in casino, or
party poker, etc.. spam?



Kyle












RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Paypal and spam domain

2004-12-31 Thread Paul Navarre









A quick look at the messages I have received from paypal
recently all show (something).paypal.com. I havent seen any exceptions.



Paul Navarre













From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004
1:42 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Paypal
and spam domain





What servers do
legitimate @paypal.com e-mail come from to include in the spamdomans file?



John Tolmachoff

Engineer/Consultant/Owner

eServices For You










image001.gif

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Paul Navarre
I don't know the answer you are specifically looking for, but you might take
the drive out of the USB case and mount it directly into the PC as a slave
drive. Copying (regardless of method) should go much more quickly then.

Paul Navarre

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Pereira
 Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 12:00 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files
 
 Hi -
 
 Sorry for the OT post, but I am in need of assistance.
 
 I have 200,000 + TIFF (70 GB Worth)images on an external USB 2.0 hard
 drive that I need to copy to my local hard drive.  It is taking
 forever.
 
 Does anyone know what the fastest way to do this is ?
 
 Drag and Drop ??  Cut and Paste ??
 
 Drop to a command prompt ??  Xcopy ??
 
 Please help.
 
 TIA
 
 jeff
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Records and Off-Network Customers

2004-09-11 Thread Paul Navarre

I believe that SPF is almost all hype and hardly any value to speak of.


I think this is a bit harsh. While SPF is certainly not the answer to all of
my prayers, it has some value.



It was originally intended to authenticate hosts, but spammers quickly
caught on and started giving themselves SPF 


This is a good development from my perspective. I give a single point to SPF
pass, and I may reduce it to 0. In other words, pass won't help a whole lot
in identifying legit email. However, when a spammer is using SPF, this also
means that they are using their own mailserver. This makes it easy to block.
I wish all spammers used SPF.



some administrators will claim a modicum of usefulness to having the Unknown
records, although I don't see it


For me unknown is simply move along, nothing to see here. Not a big help,
but no harm either.


What you didn't mention is the fail result. I score this fairly highly. I
mean if a postmaster tells me there is a problem with a message from their
domain, it lets me off the hook if I block it.

Paul Navarre


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How do I block these?

2003-11-07 Thread Paul Navarre
 Is there anyway to block on these extensions (de,ch)? I don't see any valid
 email coming from domains with these extensions.

Just so you know, this is Germany and Switzerland. Obviously you know your users 
better than I do,
but if I blocked all mail from Germany and Switzerland my phone would ring before I 
could log off
the server!

Paul

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS vs BODY

2003-11-01 Thread Paul Navarre
Is it accurate to say that a filter in DECLUDE Pro using REVDNS is more efficient and 
runs faster
than a filter using BODY?

My standard procedure was to add a BODY filter that contains the domain of a link 
found in the spam
messages that make it through other tests. This makes sure that they will be caught 
next time. I've
noticed though that a surprising number of these domains that are found in the body of 
the spam are
also the reverse DNS of the message sender. Am I better off filtering the REVDNS 
instead of the
BODY?

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Backup MX / Spam

2003-10-02 Thread Paul Navarre

You could write a filter that searches the headers for your backup server's IP address.

HEADERS   3   CONTAINS   x.x.x.x

Matt


The problem with this is if your primary does go down (rebooting for a patch for 
example), these
points will be added to *all* email until your primary is back up.

I posted just a few days ago asking if it was possible for Declude to check that 
primary was
functional. If so, there could be a test that would add points for any mail sent to 
the secondary
when the primary is functional. I realize that this would require a new version of 
Declude, but I
think it could be really worthwhile. Nobody responded to my last post, so I wasn't 
sure if there is
some reason why this wouldn't work or would be too difficult.

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] New Test?

2003-09-29 Thread Paul Navarre
Would it be possible to have a test that would check if the highest priority MX was 
running? If so,
then the test should assign a weight if a particular email was sent to a lower 
priority MX.

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ebay and Spamdomians

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Navarre
 In my experience, for HOTMAIL.COM in particular I've never seen a message
 sent through a non-Hotmail server.  I think you might have a configuration
 problem if you are seeing tons of legitimate e-mail from non Hotmail
 servers.  Especially since it's a web-based e-mail client I wouldn't think
 they could use anything but Microsoft owned, e.g. hotmail.com, msn.com,
 servers.

I'm glad I posted on this as I am realizing that I am not understanding exactly what 
is going on.
When I had the spamdomains test set at 2/3s of the hold weight, I would find 4 or 5 
legitimate
messages a day held, with spamdomains putting each message over the top.

A quick look in my logs shows that 4 or 5 messages a day is a tiny percentage compared 
to the number
of spammy messages that fail spamdomains.

The problem is that these 4 or 5 messages a day are too many for me. It seems somebody 
is on my case
whenever there is a false positive.

I realize now that yahoo.com was probably a bad example, although I am sure that I 
have seen it
happen. Perhaps Sheldon's explanation is correct.

The bottom line is that I think I need to pay better attention to those false 
positives and see if I
can figure out more about them.

Thanks for the feedback,

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ebay and Spamdomians

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Navarre
I've been surprised at everyone waxing poetic over the spamdomains test. I have had to 
give this
test very little wieght because we constantly get legitimate mail from spam domain 
addresses, but
sent through other servers. For example, I see a ton of legitimate email from hotmail 
but where the
sender sent it presumably through their work server.

That's not a knock against Declude. The test works as advertised, and I do use it. I 
just have to
give it very little weight.

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains

2003-08-11 Thread Paul Navarre
A few days ago I mentioned that I've had to reduce the weight I give to the 
spamdomains test
drastically due to false positives. Here is an example of the type of thing I am 
running into:

Received: from picturecd3.kodak.com [192.232.121.230] by netinteraction.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-7.13) id A1136D2013E; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:27:47 -0700
Received: from picturecd.kodak.com ([207.160.143.56])
by picturecd3.kodak.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h7B1Kwn15568
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:20:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'hotmail.com' found: Address of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] sent from
invalid picturecd3.kodak.com.


This was some photos that someone sent a client.

That leaves me with a frustrating choice. I can either fish these out of hold every 
time somebody
does this, or I can reduce the weight precisely for a domain that that really can 
benefit from the
spamdomains test.

Again, this isn't a criticism. I just wanted to show what is happening in the real 
world.

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Ban Attachments

2003-08-02 Thread Paul Navarre
What would be the best way to delete all messages that contain an attachment using Pro?

Thanks,

Paul Navarre 
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Counting

2003-06-13 Thread Paul Navarre
 How did this get to Weight of 24.

 FILTER-BODY filter c:\IMail\Declude\IMail_Filter_TextinBody.txt x 0 0
 Item Listed had a weight of  4

I am guessing that it caught more than one line in your filter. From what I can see, 
it only lists
the last item caught in your filter file, although it will give all of the points for 
all of the
lines caught.

Scott, is there a way to have it list all of the lines caught in the filter? I would 
find this very
helpful.

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Add-on

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Navarre
I had a situation today that has made me consider the whitelist add-on that I have 
seen discussed
here. With the archive down, I am not sure what the name of it is or where to go for 
more
information. Could someone send that information to me please ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).

Is it just me or does it seem that major ISPs are being listed in more and more spam 
databases? I
had a customer have his rather important incoming email get autodeleted because it 
reached a score
of 31 on a system of 10+ hold and 30+ delete. btinternet.com (British Telecom) is 
listed in about 10
spam databases. It seems more and more I have to give major ISPs huge negetive 
weights, and I seem
to have to constantly make them more and more negetive to keep up. Then more and more 
spam gets
through. From my perspective this trend is becoming counter productive; the spam 
databases are
unrealistic to use individually; even with Declude's superb weighting system things 
are getting more
difficult.

Scott, do you have an opinion about the whitelist add-on? The idea of keeping track of 
who are
customers are sending email to and then having them whitelisted sounds interesting, 
but I want to
know if there are any reasons why this might cause problems.

Thanks,

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] All emails are now showing up with attachment?

2003-03-20 Thread Paul Navarre
For what it is worth, I am now getting email showing up with attachments in my 
Outlook. It seems
strange as I just installed the latest Declude beta before this happened. However, 
when I go to
webmail I don't see any attachments. I haven't heard from any clients yet, so I assume 
it isn't
happening to anyone else.

I can't imagine this would be related to Declude, but I thought I would mention it in 
case this is
happening to lots of people.

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] All emails are now showing up with attachment?

2003-03-20 Thread Paul Navarre
It appears a reboot solved the emails showing up with attachment problem for me.

Paul Navarre

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.