RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-28 Thread Karen Oland
In a corporate setting a company may or may not have an Internet/email/conduct policy. If not, it may be very dificult to fire someone for conduct that they didn't agree to abide by and if it came to a lawsuit they would probably loose. In fact, in TN, a long-haul trucker won a worker's comp

Re: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-28 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
enforce those rules.. Ty it you'll be surprised. - Original Message - From: Karen Oland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 7:23 PM Subject: RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics In a corporate setting a company may or may

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Dan Patnode
All, As I read your replies, 1984 plays on Showtime (I kid you not!). The main character just read a printed letter (prehistoric email) and promptly burned it in his desk side incinerator. Thank you for your thoughtful, candid, and emphatic responses. If I may wax philosophic (and

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Darrell L.
I'll trust you on that, and apologize for the roundhouse classification. Yet in your several dozen cases where divorces were contemplated, employee terminations took place, even people who were sent back to prison and kids who have been grounded examples, clearly your

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Bill Naber
, 2003 7:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics I realize this is two questions in one day, but its a slow list day, so: Rather than deleting spam, I forward it tagged or to a shared mailbox, clients choice. I just found out that within a week of starting my my

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Brian Milburn
On 02/27/03 9:32am you wrote... I'll trust you on that, and apologize for the roundhouse classification. Yet in your several dozen cases where divorces were contemplated, employee terminations took place, even people who were sent back to prison and kids who have been

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Keith Purtell
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics I suppose you can say that any monitoring tool or piece of software could be spyware. I know in several instances where employee's were let go or suspended due to inappropriate activity were based solely

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread David Stavert
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Purtell Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics The term spyware refers to software whose sole purpose

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Dan Spangenberg
: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics In a corporate setting a company may or may not have an Internet/email/conduct policy. If not, it may be very dificult to fire someone for conduct that they didn't agree to abide by and if it came to a lawsuit they would probably

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Dan Patnode
Below is an overview of what I believe is most relevant to me (in reverse chronological order), thank you for helping me clarify a troubling situation!: I believe the fact that some employers may misuse information to mistreat employees is countered by the fact that some employees abuse the

[Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Dan Patnode
I realize this is two questions in one day, but its a slow list day, so: Rather than deleting spam, I forward it tagged or to a shared mailbox, clients choice. I just found out that within a week of starting my my anti spam service (delivery choice 2), a company fired an employee for receiving

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Madscientist
]-Original Message- ]From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Patnode ]Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:20 PM ]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics ] ] ]I realize this is two questions in one day, but its a slow list day, so: ] ]Rather

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Smart Business Lists
Dan, Wednesday, February 26, 2003 you wrote: DP I just found out that within a week of starting my my anti spam DP service (delivery choice 2), a company fired an employee for DP receiving tons of porn via email. I suppose somehow they knew he subscribed to it. Otherwise someone just

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I'd say if they fired him for just receiving porn then they better be prepared for a lawsuit. If I had something to do with getting rid of some sorry so and so that was doing stuff like that to his employer I'd feel pretty good about it. My thoughts are completely in line with

DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Brian Milburn
I seldom comment on this list, but this is something I know a little about. We have published security software since 1990 and our most popular product, CYBERsitter, since 1996. With over 2.5m users, we have seen it all. Because it records all browsing activity, there are many cases where we have

Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
This is incorrect. We do not make spyware. That is not the purpose and never has been. We make content management software. It can log activity or not. The vast majority of our customers do not maintain logs at all. I'll trust you on that, and apologize for the roundhouse