Jovanovic
Omega Network Solutions
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006
12:25 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
SKIPIFWEIGHT question
Another thing, Sharyn, is that the
riday, August 25, 2006 7:57 AMTo:
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
SKIPIFWEIGHT question
I don't know if the message comes in any log
level that is under high.
It's at the top of your filters, I
assume.
S
Title: Message
I don't know if the message comes in any log
level that is under high.
It's at the top of your filters, I
assume.
SKIPIFWEIGHT 315
Yeah, that's how I have it. It's working. I changed my log level
from mid to high and I'm seeing that
message.
9:23
AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
SKIPIFWEIGHT question
On high level logs you will see this kind of log
line:
08/24/2006 13:43:01.192 qf32001b20052.smd
Filter COMBO-MP-SPAMCOP: Skipping E-mail with a current weight of 691
(>=315)
Im not seeing
Title: Message
On high level logs you will see this kind of log
line:
08/24/2006 13:43:01.192 qf32001b20052.smd
Filter COMBO-MP-SPAMCOP: Skipping E-mail with a current weight of 691
(>=315)
Im not seeing anything like that, so I'm guessing something
isn't right. Matter of
com
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 8:20
AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
SKIPIFWEIGHT question
I then use SKIPIFWEIGHT at the top of all of my penalty text filter
files so that if the message is already spammy enough to have earned my
highest action weight, I don't s
Title: Message
Obviously I am just braindead or I have missed something
here.
If I
have SKIPIFWEIGHT 30 in my filter files, why are my logs still showing emails
having weights of over 30?
Btw,
I'm running V 2.06. According to the manual, this should be working with this
version which le
Title: Message
I then use SKIPIFWEIGHT at the top of all of my penalty text filter files
so that if the message is already spammy enough to have earned my highest action
weight, I don't spend any further CPU time on the message.
Will there be an entry in the log file
stating that the res
Title: Message
I then use SKIPIFWEIGHT at the top of all of my penalty text filter files
so that if the message is already spammy enough to have earned my highest action
weight, I don't spend any further CPU time on the message.
Thanks, this is exactly what I was
trying to do, I just
t 24, 2006 2:36 PMTo:
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
SKIPIFWEIGHT question
SKIPIFWEIGHT needs to be in each filter that you
want to skip.
- Original Message -
From:
Sharyn
Schmidt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Title: SKIPIFWEIGHT question
SKIPIFWEIGHT needs to be in each filter that you
want to skip.
- Original Message -
From:
Sharyn
Schmidt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 11:06
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT
question
Title: SKIPIFWEIGHT question
I'm looking over the Declude Junkmail manual and I'm not clear on how this is used.
I have several filters and I delete on Weight 30. It's silly for Declude to keep processing the mail after it reaches weight 30 since it's going to be deleted anyway.
If I am re
com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT - RUNIFWEIGHT?
Hi;
Is
there anyway one can run a test if the weight, at the time the filter
is run, is above a certain point and below a certain point?
I
know we can skip tests if a certain weight is reached but it seems like
we can n
see some filter enhancements.
- Original Message -
From:
Kami Razvan
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 2:58
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
SKIPIFWEIGHT - RUNIFWEIGHT?
Hi..
Yes we can.. that is what I am doing now..
I wa
3:45 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
SKIPIFWEIGHT - RUNIFWEIGHT?
could you chain a few
skipifweightfilters?
under10.txt
skipifweight 10
remoteip 0 contains .
filter2.txt
testsfailed end notcontains
under10.txt
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT
- RUNIFWEIGHT?
Hi;
Is there anyway
one can run a test if the weight, at the time the filter is run, is above a
certain point and below a certain point?
I know we can
skip tests if a certain weight is reached but it seems like we
ot; at are real tests themselves,
as defined in global.cfg as a standard weight test.
-Chris
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami
RazvanSent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:39 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT
- RUNIFW
Hi;
Is there anyway
one can run a test if the weight, at the time the filter is run, is above a
certain point and below a certain point?
I know we can skip
tests if a certain weight is reached but it seems like we can not run a test
only if the weight is above a certain level.
This can
> SKIPIFWEIGHT
> Can I use this to prevent spamd from running if the current weight of the
> email already excedes a delete action?
SPAMC32 already includes its own switch, -sw, which is the skip-if
weight. See the command-line help (-?) for details.
--Sandy
---
SKIPIFWEIGHT
Can I use this to prevent spamd from running if the current weight of the
email already excedes a delete action?
I am using 1.82 so I don't have the global option to stoponfirstdelete.
I have my delete option set at 20, but I see in the logs that declude is
still scanning after
SKIPIFWEIGHT
Can I use this to prevent spamd from running if the current weight of the
email already excedes a delete action?
I am using 1.82 so I don't have the global option to stoponfirstdelete.
I have my delete option set at 20, but I see in the logs that declude is
still scanning after
Since the fromfiles are loaded first and weight assigned after it gets a
hit, even before RBL's, can I use the skipifweight or STOPATFIRSTHIT
option in the fromfiles? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail c
Is there a way to use the "SKIPIFWEIGHT" option for external tests?
No, that option only applies to filters.
There are some nice external plugins for JunkMail, but I would like not to
run them on mails that all ready meet our hold weight. Thanks!
We are considering an option that would allow you
Is there a way to use the "SKIPIFWEIGHT" option for external tests? There
are some nice external plugins for JunkMail, but I would like not to run
them on mails that all ready meet our hold weight. Thanks!
Ken Weise
Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by De
Scott,
It's only in custom filter files that you write and not something in a
configuration file. Search the archives for that feature and you should
find plenty on it. Also note that this is new and only supported in
JunkMail Pro, versions 1.77+ (which are all beta and interim releases).
Mat
I missed out on the discussion of the new feature "skipifweight" Is that
only a filter command or can it be used in the global.cfg or
junkmail.default file?
The SKIPIFWEIGHT option is used to skip a filter test if the weight so far
is at least a certain amount, and only applies to filters.
I missed out on the discussion of the new feature "skipifweight" Is that
only a filter command or can it be used in the global.cfg or
junkmail.default file?
_
Scott Fosseen - Systems Engineer -Prairie Lakes AEA
http://fosseen.us/sc
- Original Message -
From: "Danny Klopfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Does the SKIPIFWEIGHT or MAXWEIGHT show up in the log if it is triggered?
> Doing a search I don't see it.
I don't know if they get recorded in the logs at log level low or mid, but
the do get recorder at log level high.
B
Does the SKIPIFWEIGHT or MAXWEIGHT show up in the log if it is triggered?
Doing a search I don't see it.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
Scott,
I was on 1.76i28 but upgraded as suggested, and I was able to verify
that the filter is now hit when the score is within the difference in
points from the SKIPIFWEIGHT and it is logged. I'm not totally sure if
this perfectly represents the original issue, though I tried to mimic
the fu
Ok, I have finally gotten around to modifying my filters to use some of
the new features. It definitely is having an impact on my processor from
what I can see. I think I have uncovered a bug or bugs though in terms of
how thresholds are calculated and how it affects processing and logging.
T
Scott,
Ok, I have finally gotten around to modifying my filters to use some of
the new features. It definitely is having an impact on my processor
from what I can see. I think I have uncovered a bug or bugs though in
terms of how thresholds are calculated and how it affects processing and
lo
So if I want to perform an action at 100 should I change these to:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 101
MAXWEIGHT101
No. You definitely, positively should not be using SKIPIFWEIGHT or
MAXWEIGHT right now unless you understand exactly how they work. I would
urge you to wait until the next beta before
So if I want to perform an action at 100 should I change these to:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 101
MAXWEIGHT101
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Junk
Once again I found my own problem.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick Samarelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT
> I have my system setup
I have my system setup as listed below.
Why would the system ingnore the WEIGHT100 DELETE
Note that the SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT options in the latest interim
release only apply to the filters that they are listed in.
it is performing WEIGHT40 ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(In the top of my Filt
- Original Message -
From: "Kami Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 5:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT
> Hi Frederick:
>
> Here is what we do:
>
> # Version>= 1.2
ust in case...
Hope that answers your question..
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 11:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT
Does any on
Does any one have more information on these SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT
Thanks.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?
> Fr
>
> >Does SKIPIFWEIGHT also work in FROMFILE or SPAMDOMAINS test files?
>
> No, it only applies to the filter files.
>
> -Scott
Can you please add to the wish list? Again, this would help cut down on
running more tests when an email is already ov
Does SKIPIFWEIGHT also work in FROMFILE or SPAMDOMAINS test files?
No, it only applies to the filter files.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader
Does SKIPIFWEIGHT also work in FROMFILE or SPAMDOMAINS test files?
Karen
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just s
42 matches
Mail list logo
