However, I'd like to hear if anyone may have a problem with having the
phrase appear in an X-RBL-Warning: header.
Stu and Charles brought up 2 good examples.
John Tolmachoff
MCSE, CSSA
Owner, Network Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
City of Industry, CA
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
You need to add the XSENDERON setting in the GLOBAL.CFG so that you
can see what the actual sender e-mail address is.
Do you mean the auto-whitelisting feature for webmail?
John Tolmachoff
MCSE, CSSA
Owner, Network Engineer/Consultant
PO Box 91975
City of Industry, CA 91715-1975
Yep. It was working before, just all of the sudden stopped. No changes
here since the report from the customer.
What does the log show?
John Tolmachoff
MCSE, CSSA
Owner, Network Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
City of Industry, CA
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned
Yet some mail is whitelisted properly to other customers...
Look at these once you have the XSENDER setting ON.
I am thinking it will show that the actual sender is different than the from
address in the header.
John Tolmachoff
MCSE, CSSA
Owner, Network Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
I had a situation today that has made me consider the whitelist add-on
that I have
seen discussed
here. With the archive down, I am not sure what the name of it is or where
to go for
more
information. Could someone send that information to me please
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
AutoWhite for
What do the logs say?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Forsyth
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I received something weird. It was like the headers only.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Friday, June 06,
Please see the lengthy thread on the Imail forum on this subject.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of keith - cribellum
Sent: Friday, June 06,
It is the Friday Afternoon Gremlin.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lester Brown
Sent: Friday, June
06, 2003 3:51 PM
To:
I have noticed something. It seems that %REMOTEIP% always shows the IP the
Imail received from, even if that IP is listed in the Global.cfg as
IPBYPASS.
From my Global.cfg:
LOGLEVELHIGH
HOP 0
HOPHIGH 2
CONSOLE ON
IPBYPASS67.94.227.36
From my
That's because Declude JunkMail and Declude Virus are separate. Although
they share a lot of functionality, this is a place where they
differ: Declude JunkMail has the ability to use the HOP/HOPHIGH/IPBYPASS
options, but Declude Virus does not.
DUH. I guess that is what I get for working
Logs and headers please.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL
Scott, with talk recently of optimization and efficiency, and where
certain
tests should be conducted to save on CPU cycles. I was thinking that one
way to gain efficiency would be to NOT run Declude and third-party apps
(SpamChk, AlliGate/SpamManager, Sniffer, etc.) on whitelisted e-mails
Does anyone that doesn't agree with Bill have any suggestions?
Scott, I'm just wondering what your thoughts are on these proposed
changes?
FWIW, I have been extremely busy so far this week. I am in the midst of a 3
day Windows Server 2003 training class. Therefore, I have not been able to
I know it has been asked for before and said to be impossible
(programmer
speak, for don't want to do it -- I know, being one), but PLEASE consider
creating multiple copies of messages that arrive for multiple recipients,
so
that the spam filters can operate (yes, this means some
Since when is a company not allowed to send out production information and
such to its customers, and on an infrequent basis at that?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it and reported it.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
It's a wonder that more people don't submit mail maliciously if the
system works as it appears.
Some do.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
John,
In your list you your have: microsoft.com msn.com
Urgh, I can't win. It is not my list. Please people, read the entire post.
(Yes, I myself am guilty at times, so first admonishment is to me.)
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
OUCH
How did I post this to the list? This was to be sent to Scott only...
OUCH OUCH OUCH... Forgot to set off my reply receipt :'(
5000 responses later... So sorry folks ...
OUCH OUCH
And to the wrong list non-the-less.
And with the wrong subject line non-the-less.
50 lashes with
Not sure how doable is this or if it can be exploited by spammers, but as
a
fail safe, cant we setup a certain FROM and TO email accounts on a domain
which we know any email going between those two accounts (from doesn't
have
to be an email account on server) is 99.99% never spam?
This way
To make this closer to a failsafe, we can have your program check the
weight
already assigned to the configured match, if its above X weight, it would
trigger a configurable alert (off site email, event log, log file...etc)
But what about this scenario: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends a message to
Catching almost no FP with holding at 10? I don't think so.
Anything coming from Yahoo.com will then automatically be at half of your
hold weight.
This is a known problem with Yahoo.
Couple of recommendations.
Change your weighting setup.
Setup a white filter.
User another external program to
Not yet, but I intend to try in a couple of weeks.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003
Forgive the intrusion (I just troll here, don't actually have JM yet),
but this idea seems flawed. If you quit testing once a certain weight
has been reached, wouldn't you cut off further testing that might reduce
that weight? In a system where a score can go up and down depending on
the
IMO, RAM drives are best for page files and databases.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, June 04,
This weekend several spam messages have gotten through to my mailbox.
When I
test the sending IPs I find they are listed in numerous blacklists and
should have
been caught by Declude. I have seen this periodically and believed that
other
servers like SpamCop or whatever where down momentarily
Im new to this amazing product and I am quite impressed, even with the
lite
version.
Welcome to the Wonderful World of Disney. No wait, I mean Declude. ;-)
The problem is, I don't know where to start tweaking. So I am looking at
some tweaking stories, hopefully from people with a similar
Eric originally said this would be added in v7.14, but it was not.
Perhaps it was
added in v8.0; however, we're not running 8.0 yet so I don't know if it
was actually
added or not. But if it was, this would make it possible for Scott to add
a test that
flags authenticated SMTP sessions.
One other thing to think about. My workstation is in my home office. My mail
server is at my NOC. I have a VPN setup between my home office and the NOC
for administration of the servers.
Any mail I send shows a remote IP of my private address, sense my mail
server received it through the VPN.
Speaking of logging, would it be possible to add using a syslog daemon
as an option, I don't know off hand if it will save any processing
power, but it seems like it might since you will no longer have to
manage log file resources (locking, checking creation, destination
folder). It would
Hi, John,
Do you have a link to your program?
No link, as it never made it out of beta, do to the company it was created
under...
Here is the explination:
Declude calls Match passing the sender and recipients.
Match checks the sender against the from.txt file for a match. (Specific
address
Title: Spammanager question
Short
answer, I love it. I have been using it since it was first out in beta.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actions are taken at the end of all
tests.
The first one did not reach weight of
15.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wes
Scott, in this case, how much work to allow the use of a space after the
root domain?
Actually, that wouldn't work; neither the return address nor the reverse
DNS entry will have a space in them.
I know they would not, but if the file could have a space, or even another
character that would
First, I would just delete anything older than 7 days. If it was something
important, either you would have heard about it by now or it was resent.
I use SpamReview daily to review messages. During the review, I also look
for ways to adjust tests and filters.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Try using WeightRange instead of Weight.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
626-737-6003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent:
There is a Declude Virus list. You can subscribe by sending a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and in the body put subscribe Declude.Virus.
Yes, you need a AV Scanning engine, like F-Prot, that Declude Virus calls.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
I wish we could have a central place that would maintain a list with
up-to-date information so we all could use.
How can we do this?
I would be willing to host it. I could set up a specific e-mail address that
everyone could send updates to and I would then review and add it to the
list. It
First problem I heard about with Bell Canada.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:25
Customer emails do not get through and they blame me for it... This
happens
mostly with hosted domains on their system. This has been going on for
about
2 years. Emails have never been responded to. Very frustrating!
Gotcha, sites hosted with them. I have heard only good things about their
At the moment I can't find any other virusname to skip.
For the recip.eml I've set
SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Vulnerability
And I've creted a new vulnerability.eml with
SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEDOESNOTHAVE Vulnerability
So I can send out two different warnings for a real virus and a
vulnerability
This is the line in the $default$.junkmail
WHITELISTFILE D:\IMail\Declude\Whitelist.txt
Looking at this log fragment the whitelist is working but the pass
checking
actions does not like the WHITELISTFILE line in the .junkmail file.
I am not familiar with this test yet, but unless
Users of some remote system using Challenge/Response send his users
messages
and his system generates Challenge messages. The remote server receives
the
Challenge messages and sends new Challenge messages back to his server.
His
server sends back bounce messages because his Challenge messages
I have seen it discussed as something some wanted, but I never saw
anything
talking about being able to use a vulnerability.eml file in a release of
Declude. I tried searching the archives but vulnerability.eml actually
shows every email with vulnerability in it which is a lot of mail. Also
I
Will the e-mail admin of US Internet please contact me off list?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
I posted both of their lists here.
http://downloads.wpa.net/billb_sd.zip
http://downloads.wpa.net/sheldons_sd.zip
Both lists current as of 6/13/2003
Of course, I see this after I just responded to the other post. Frederick,
if you are going to maintain this, then I need not bother,
I decided against notifying the recipient for Vulnerabilities.
Apparently,
vulnerabilities are essentially spam - and notifying the recipient would
mean that they end up getting an unwanted message after all.
In my experience, that is true 98% of the time. That 2% percent though can
cause
There has been some discussion on this issue, both for admin and end user.
There is/are some project(s) under way to address this.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SD Lists
Of course, I see this after I just responded to the other
post
you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP:OT: Can't Get To SpamCop's Web
Site
What is the IP
After getting a few of these also, I just added netraprise.com to my Imail
Kill list.
Problem solved.
:))
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Has there been any more thought to allow Declude to have an option to either
use more than one DNS server, or have failover support to a secondary DNS
server?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Has there been any more thought to allow Declude to have an option to
either
use more than one DNS server, or have failover support to a secondary DNS
server?
It's something that we are considering. The catch, though, is that it
would only really be useful in conjunction with the Declude
Title: Message
I believe rules.ima gets run last.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Earl Baumgardner
Sent: Wednesday, June
Filter file for BODY your-instant-credit-reporter.org without the quotes.
Can some one post the full headers?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Server
Has there been any more thought to allow Declude to have
Since I have not got around to
publishing the white paper on implementing SpamManager (Now Alligate) as an integrated
test within Declude, here is a simple run down:
Here is what I do and what is
recommended:
I defined 6 tests as below. Using the
greater than and less than signs
What is the best way to block mail failing the EASYNET-DNSBL and IPNOTINMX
tests? I put a hold on IPNOTINMX and that held legitimate mail. I see
alot
of mail failing these two tests and need to block it without hindering
legitimate mail.
IPNOTINMX was never designed to be a test to take
I need a good example of a $Default$JunkMail file. Want to see if I have
a
good setup. I put a hold on the IPNOTINMX and created a big problem (held
alot of legitimate mail). I would like to see some samples of how others
have setup their $Default$JunkMail and Global.cfg files.
I am on my
If the console is not being used at all, how does Hijack keep track of IP
addresses?
If the console is not being used, how can HOLD2 be cleared other than
restarting the computer?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was
I notice this kind of entry on either web messaging messages or auto notices
created by Declude or Imail:
06/25/2003 14:55:17 Q05fba2a0764 Warning: Could not find IP3 end on first
line of datafile (bound)?
06/25/2003 14:55:18 Q05fba2a0764 is not local.
06/25/2003 14:55:18 Q05fba2a0764 Outgoing
If the console is not being used at all, how does Hijack keep track of IP
addresses?
It does not. Without the Declude console running, Declude Hijack will not
work. However, if the \IMail\Deccon.exe file exists, then it will
automatically get started by Declude Hijack as needed.
Thanks.
Alex, I have seen no issues with Hijack
and Imail V. 8.
Are you using DAISYCHAIN any where in
Declude?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create a filterfile test, then have it
check HEADERS for that string.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent:
I thought Win2003 was supposed to have added console access to Terminal
Services (I have some recollection that you are running 2003, could be
wrong though)? If you are not running 2003, just install VNC for the
occasions you need console access. That's what I had to do.
I was using Windows
are sendingfrom killerwebmail.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: John
Tolmachoff (Lists)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June
26, 2003 2:27 AM
Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Another Hijack question
Alex, I have seen no issues with Hijack
Rolling Eyes
See my reply on Imail list.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
Or is it a ploy to harvest more addresses?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:25 PM
Title: Nachricht
Go to sleep Markus. It has been too long
of a week to think.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Title: Message
Cisco bought Linksys.
John
Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices
For You
626-737-6003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday,
How about a new Manual page. The last released version was in early
December and there have been a ton of new things added. It is getting
harder and harder to search through the archives to find clarification
on a feature.
That is because there is no new release version yet.
As Scott has
To get around this on my email server on the T-1 I added the built-in SMTP
server that come with IIS and Windows 2000 but changed the default port
number from 25 to 26.
Now I have two SMTP servers on the same server Imail ver 8.0 and Declude
Junkmail and Virus using the standard ports so
Please post the JunkMail log for this message.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of interactiveaustria
Sent: Wednesday, July 02,
Declude Console stopped working after the 8.01 Imail Upgrade (Pro). The
mail
is getting through the server and is being commented by Declude. I did not
change anything else. I even tried bumping up to 1.70 beta, still no
console. The line in the global and virus .cfg files should read 'Console
OK Further investigation shows deccon.exe IS running (so says the taks
manager) however, there is nothing showing up on the desktop. Weird eh?
Are you using Terminal Services (which doesn't seem to have any way to
display the default desktop)?
Speaking of this, is anyone running Imail with
I send the TESTSFAILED in the spamattach message body with the attached
mail. It looks like it failed an incredible number of tests but it
really only failed the HELOBOGUS, IPNOTINMX, FROMFILE, SNIFFER
Although I do not use spamattach, I only use TESTSFAILED in the headers.
John Tolmachoff
CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Gable
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July
03, 2003 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'John Tolmachoff (Lists)'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
SpamManager test
Scott
Checking the bad header code on this returns a unknown reason. Does someone
know the reason for BADHEADERS and ROUTING?
Declude version 1.70i14 beta.
Received: from srv1.eservicesforyou.net [67.94.227.35] by
mail.eservicesforyou.net
(SMTPD32-8.00) id A5BE14B01AC; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 22:31:42
Feature request for a filter test option like so:
SUBJECT 5 IS ALLSMALL
To catch subject lines that are in all small letters.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Are they by chance running a AV SMTP gateway product on Exchange that could
be misconfigured?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Has you found an universal characteristic for this?
We have found enough examples of subject-lines in both all small or all
upper case that wasn't spam.
Not universal, I was thinking of adding just a small weight to it, like 3 or
so.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For
This one failed the ROUTING test because it was sent from the U.S. to a
mailserver in Brazil, back to a mailserver in the U.S.
The E-mail failed the BADHEADERS test because it was sent from a mail
client that is not Y2K compliant (it is specifying that the E-mail was
sent
in 1903, before
codeis -18 it gets a weight of 20 if so configured in the Global.cfg as
below,correct?
ALLIGATEADULT1external-17D:\IMail\Alligate\NoXMail.exe200
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Monday, July 07
Tolmachoff (Lists)
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLSMALL
To catch subject lines that are in all small letters.
You mean like:
'opinion about buongiorno.com'
'open relay tester'
'maxip4r parameter'
'spamcop?'
:)
-Sandy
Sanford Whiteman
Yeah, I have seen about 10 of those in the last 24 hours.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, July 08,
They had a big outage during that time.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:57 PM
I have been seeing a couple a week.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:00 AM
To:
However, depending on your needs, you could set up a Imail Store and Forward
Gateway or use the Gateway services of some one running Imail and Declude.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a test in Declude Junkmail to check (VERIFY) that the sender
exists?
i.e. Using the SMTP VRFY command to check the validity of the sender. If
the address is not valid, toss the mail!
This is one that we are considering adding.
It isn't foolproof, though -- it will often say an
www.eservicesforyou.com/products/autowhite.html
Sorry, I promise I will get to updating the site soon. However, client work
comes first. ;-)
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any more thought
given to this feature request?
This will
whitelist a message if it is only to the postmaster or root. If there are any
other recipients, it is processed as normal.
Also, WHITELIST
ABUSEONLY would be nice.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices
I would be interested in seeing this.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:41 AM
To:
Yea, and expose my server's security to fix some GUI issue?
Sounds like Ipswitch should provide a maintenance release for v6.0 users
to eradicate this problem.
Uh, trying reading through the many posts in the archives on the Imail
forum. This is the Declude JunkMail list. The pros and cons
Are you using the PERCENT test?
They are using something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]@domain.com.
From the JunkMail manual:
PERCENT
This test will catch all mail with To:
addresses that contain a percent sign. The percent sign indicates an outdated
routing method
I have had the intent but not the time. I am willing to host it. In fact, I
already have it set up just need the documents to include.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RL Do you think that we can move the Declude list to yahoo for the
following
I veto (if I had that authority) any such idea or move.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
At this time, all updates would be routed through one person to update
manually.
If there is a better way...
BTW, if someone has a better way and wants to maintain it, but has no server
available, it can be done on mine.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
What do the log files say? Do they indicate a connection?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of i360
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL
Does the path to the text file need to be in quotes?
No.
The only time quotes are required (or can be used properly) is in external
tests.
What if there is a space in either the directory name or the file name?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
1 - 100 of 983 matches
Mail list logo
