Hello List,
Im new to this amazing product and I am quite impressed, even with the lite
version.
I have 100k+ email accounts on my mail server. I setup my declude on my
server with the latest beta and the default configuration file. I set it to
tag emails with the subject of spam: on the
Imgate http://imgate.meiway.com/ was specifically made to address these
problems.
The setup process isn't very cute, but the performance gains are phenomenal.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng.
(Karl Drugge)
Sent:
I agree, but spamcop doesn't think so. Look at headers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam
Since when
Glad to know im not way too off in my suggestions ...
To make this closer to a failsafe, we can have your program check the weight
already assigned to the configured match, if its above X weight, it would
trigger a configurable alert (off site email, event log, log file...etc)
-Original
Sorry to that, but im curious, what brand of HD should we be avoiding?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 3:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Accounting for secondary MX
Don't get scared the from the very long list, you don't have to vote on
everything.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Vote for Declude!
Yeah, declude is not very much HDD IO intensive, CPU power is the key.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude on RAM
Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:57 AM
To: Omar K.
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] My domain failing HELOBOGUS
You need to have a MX record for hasna.jeeran.com which you don't
have.
Best regards,
Eje Gustafsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Family
Again, I suggest you work with the system, give the tests the appropriate
weights and perform actions (hold/delete/route) on those weights, not on a
specific test.
You will end up with quite a few False positive if you perform an action on
specific test, especially the IPNOTINMX.
-Original
Can you please elaborate on why this should be done, and if this setting is
an all recommendation or something specific to imail/declude
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Parks
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL
(NTVDM Error
resolved)
Hi Omar,
You can read some background information about the issue at:
http://www.declude.com/dq.htm
It is in the part about Microsoft's mystery heap
Best regards,
Mike Higgins
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K
Should have all of what you need to know:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20021218-DM01.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Maze -
Hostmaster
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Still, I thought it was very unprofessional of ipswitch to leave its
customers with such an ultimatum.
I personally have kept the patch (security priority #1, regardless) and have
learned to use the imail admin with the GUI handicap (its doable).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Nevertheless, I think having a test that would look at invalid, or like this
case, rarely used format in a weighted environment with a low appropriate
weight would help in reducing spam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent:
I would also suggest expanding your FAQ to lower the rate of the same
questions that keep on recurring on the list every week.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sounds interesting, for how long have you been using it ? Do you have any
stats?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..
Yes, same here, I noticed that it is tagging IP's that have not been caught
by easynet or osirusoft.
Another really cool thing about this service, is the stat report they send
you at the end of the day, tells you what IP's they blocked for you, what
IP's you gave a good positive, and other
Indeed, I think you should forward your legit concerns to them if you truly
want to make a positive difference.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 10:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
I fell for it, so im assuming that joe blogs will too. Im never clicking on
such a link again, and I assume as we see more abuse, most people wont
either.
Received: from hasna.jeeran.com [208.187.144.109] by jeeran.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A9731C300C0; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:18:11 +0200
Yes, Trustic are about to overwhole their system to face these issues. In
the meantime, you should submit a positive recommendation for the IP
addresses you mentioned.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Dodell
Sent: Friday, August 01,
http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-5058610.html?tag=fd_lede1_hed
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Geiser
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Article: End of the road for SMTP ?
Omar,
Do you realize the e-mail that you send to this list has a date which is 15
days in the future?
Just Curious,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Omar K
Also, to eliminate options of what is causing the problem, I would suggest
setting a different DNS server in the global.cfg and see if the error still
occurs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Dodell
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 3:35
Could it be a timeout issue because of some network failure?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Dodell
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 12:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] strange DNS failures
First the backround
Im really surprised that there isn't a site out there that reviews and rates
those RBLs. All I have seen is listings.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webmaster Oilfield
Directory
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:48 PM
To: [EMAIL
How are the false positive rates ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OSRELAY question.
Until a few days ago, I was using
Have not personally used sorbs, but I think you choose a very select item
(BADCONF/.11) that would not be triggered often, try to use a wider ranges
of the sorbs tests available.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick
Sent: Friday,
Im glad someone is doing the testing :) please let us know of the FP rate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 7:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Configuration Question
I get bombarded by this kind of spam often, most of it is sleazy porn, and
it passes thru.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 12:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
I personally would welcome such a test, since I assume its trivial to
program and wouldn't add much processing time. Then each to his own if they
want to use it and what weight to apply.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Title: Message
ive
seen many of those happening to our users too.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Colbeck, AndrewSent: Wednesday, October 01,
2003 11:46 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAM -
I have imail 6 on W2K AS and have had the same problems, only happens when
the server is hammered with mail and there is a 100% CPU util.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 6:54 PM
To:
I have used spamchk (an add on for declude) www.spamchk.com and its pretty
good at catching such emails, as long as the filters are configured
correctly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 3:15
Will these filters work with junkmail lite?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISHSUB v1.0.4 - Filter updated
Well, after quite
Can you comment on the stats from this RBL? What about false positives ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Administration
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 6:02 PM
To: Dan Geiser
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AHBL Anyone?
Hello,
i'm using
You're not going to be able to block it. It can't be done.
Can't he black list the IP address in imail's smtp service ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have had many FP with NJABL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:38 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] EasyNet Replacements
Hi,
With the demise of EasyNet (which was my
Since declude/spamchk are all CPU and network intensive, I doubt that would
have a very noticeable effect.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gufler Markus
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Simply put, a link for a change log on the site that talks about
interims/beta releases cant hurt anyone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I see your point, I don't want to sound redundant (too late I guess :), but
I come from a point of view that the more information we have the better
decisions we make about which interim/beta to run, and with semi-formal
documentation about the interim releases IMHO it will help you achieve the
I have to agree with Scott on this. On my server, I will load the latest
beta. On servers I work on for others, I only use release versions. The
only
time I use interim releases is when I am having a problem or need a
specific
added feature.
I don't think anyone would disagree with you here. But
Taking everyone point in prospective, a good compromise would be releasing
more frequent betas and lessen the number of interim releases. So instead
of the average 20 interim releases till a beta, you could fork out a beta
every 15 interim releases.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
For those of you who filter on body/subject.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
InfoSec News
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ISN] Trojan Horse Making Its Way Into Windows Systems
Everyone pats John on his back and assure him they have all gone through
similar experiences :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 7:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
It seems to me like spammers setup a service where we have to pay them in
order not get spammed ?!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ISPHuset Nordic
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 2:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
I've got an IMGate machine in front of my imail/declude, and ive set it up
to drop any connection where anywhere in the SMTP header/banner it claims an
IP or a domain of mine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday,
Im running version 6 and have not found a reason to upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gufler Markus
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Server Gone Wild
hmmm... very
After upgrading to the latest beta, I noticed that all of my emails are
being tagged as failing this test. Is this how it should be?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
I, and believe many others, completely block any Dynamic IP range on my
outer mail gateway (IMGate). They are infested with open relays, zombies,
proxies. To me, blocking all this range is worth the one or two false
positives that happen every month. I use sorb's list. Check it out at
I am using the latest beta of junkmail lite and want to setup my
$default$.junkmail file so that it holds any emails between 25-30, and
deletes anything larger than that.
What's the best way to achieve that ?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
Also declude has progressed in a way allowing admins to greatly customize
every installation based on their specific network and spam they receive,
making no two installations the same, and rendering the idea of sharing
config file impossible.
Invest an hour in reading the manual and a few more
I personally block all Dynamic IP address on my outer mail gateway, so not
even declude sees this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alejandro
Valenzuela
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 6:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Can someone please share their spamdomains file?
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DLAnalyzer Support
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 6:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOTMAIL ?
Ron,
The best thing
, mostly from small to mid
size
setups. Therefore, the results were not reliable.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K.
Sent
I was able to resolve wltx.com just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell LaRock
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)
This is off topic, but I need some
Does anyone know what's the best way to get in touch with the people who are
responsible for yahoo's mail operation?
Thanks,
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
Just for clarification, im not using an IPBYPASS, im using HOP 1, which I
believe would lead to the same thing, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
The hilton thing? I got a ton of them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of paul
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] man, what the heck?
Geez, am I the only one who's gotten a bunch of
A big majority of our mail is actually composed of foreign email, so I use
the non-English test to put a slight negative weight :)
I counter this by adding weight to Chinese and Russian character sets.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Would this new test work with Declude Lite using HOP 1 setting?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New CMDSPACE test in latest
I have declude lite installed behind installed behind a mail gateway, so I
have the HOP 1 setting and the IP4R tests don't work because of this. Will
that also be the case with the CMDSPACE test?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott
For what its worth, I think a yellow warning is more appropriate for such a
problem than a red one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Several spam emails are being whitelisted by declude, I didnt know what was
causing it as I dont have any whitelisting going on, until I noticed the
habeas header.
Am I correct in thinking that this spam messages got whitelisted because of
Habeas? And if so, what next step should I take other
This is good stuff, other than the obvious scheduling capability, does
diskeeper do a better job than the built-in defrag in windows server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Uhte (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:07 PM
To:
Title: Message
Yeah
those are definitely tripped out zombie machines.
But im
impressed how they really try to be "polite" when talking to our mail
servers!
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of marc catuognoSent: Tuesday,
I use http://www.enom.com and im quite happy with them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 8:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation
Tucows has
My experience as well. They also provide a great API interface to integrate
with your site so that you could seem like a complete independent
registrar to your customers.
Also, I read somewhere that their rate go lower if you deposit a higher $
amount.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Title: Message
Mess
around with the mime maps for your IIS server, define that file extension as
anything other than clear-text, I think that will tell the browser to treat it
as an attachment and not open it up in the browser.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, February 04, 2004 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Slightly OT: calculating bandwidth
- Original Message -
From: Omar K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Im trying to figure out how much bandwidth my imail
server sends/receives, I know its best to do this on the
router level, but I don't have
I want to disable and completely freeze some email accounts from receiving
any email (rejected at the SMTP level if possible) or being accessed through
web mail or popup access. What
settings do I need to use? I am using an SQL backend for that mail domain.
Thanks,
---
[This E-mail was scanned
If a message is sent to an account that doesn't exist on the mail domain.
Does imail still pass it for declude for processing ?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
I have deleted thousands of email accounts on my domain, and those accounts
still receive 10s of thousands of mainly spam messages. To decrease server
load, would it be possible to make it so declude doesn't see the email for
non-existing email accounts? I think this will also help decrease load
72 matches
Mail list logo
