Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 3:27 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID Gotcha...I'll try it and let you know what happens... Thanks, Scott. Anyone else had any success or problems using SWITCHRECIPS ON? Darin. - Original

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-23 Thread Darin Cox
Hmmm...the manual says SWITCHRECIPS ON... I'll try it without the second S... Darin. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 8:24 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID It's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Hmmm...the manual says SWITCHRECIPS ON... Thanks for pointing that out -- it's fixed now. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-23 Thread Darin Cox
That did it...Thanks, Scott. Might want to correct the manualgrin Darin. - Original Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID Hmmm...the manual says

[Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-22 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Scott, I just switched to LOGLEVEL MID to get more info for reporting and was puzzled by a couple of things: 1. Domains that are whitelisted for incoming mail seem to still be tested: 02/22/2004 10:27:14 Qca3e0543037a1ab3 WARNING: DNS server 10.0.0.32 returned a SERVER FAILURE error

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
I just switched to LOGLEVEL MID to get more info for reporting and was puzzled by a couple of things: 1. Domains that are whitelisted for incoming mail seem to still be tested: Correct. Declude JunkMail gets very complex! For example, if BYPASSWHITELIST is used, then the E-mail may not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-22 Thread Darin Cox
: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID I just switched to LOGLEVEL MID to get more info for reporting and was puzzled by a couple of things: 1. Domains that are whitelisted for incoming mail seem to still be tested: Correct. Declude JunkMail gets very complex! For example

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
What problems might we see if using SWITCHRECIP ON? That's up to you to discover. :) Specifically, each E-mail has both an intended recipient (the address the sender types in), and an actual recipient (the one the E-mail is routed to). With most E-mail addresses, both are the same (unless

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-22 Thread Darin Cox
: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID What problems might we see if using SWITCHRECIP ON? That's up to you to discover. :) Specifically, each E-mail has both an intended recipient (the address the sender types in), and an actual recipient (the one the E-mail is routed to). With most E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-22 Thread Andy Schmidt
:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID Gotcha...I'll try it and let you know what happens... Thanks, Scott. Anyone else had any success or problems using SWITCHRECIPS ON? Darin. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID

2004-02-22 Thread Darin Cox
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Questions about LOGLEVEL MID Gotcha...I'll try it and let you know what happens... Thanks, Scott. Anyone else had any success or problems using SWITCHRECIPS ON? Darin. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED