Sorry - new thread, as requested.
I used the label mysterious because people (like me) had been highly
anticipating the JPEG detection feature - and today we learn purely by
accident that there are new interim and release releases.
Mystery is an appropriate word, since I (the customer) know of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mysterious
Sorry - new thread, as requested.
I used the label mysterious because people (like me) had been highly
Yes Scott, thank you for updating Declude as well. I would prefer to have
notifications of new releases go out ASAP to the lists, so that we as
customers can decide if they are a priority to get installed...
I agree. :) If I had been the one deciding, I would likely have notified
the lists
I used the label mysterious because people (like me) had been highly
anticipating the JPEG detection feature - and today we learn purely by
accident that there are new interim and release releases.
FYI, there was no new interim. Someone went to the URL to get an interim,
saw that it wasn't what
R. Scott Perry wrote:
... especially with all these new potential dangerous JPG's floating
around (BTW, how common are these, has anyone been picking them up
with declude?)
I'm not aware of any being picked up with Declude Virus yet. But
there was a report earlier today of a trojan horse
