With Adapter Fault Tolerance, you only have one MAC. The inactive
card's actual MAC address is suppressed, and the driver uses the LAA
(Locally Administered Address) ability to use that MAC when it becomes
the active card. There is a tiny pause where the switch has to learn
that the MAC has
It's one thing to have the facts and make the decision yourself...it's
another to have blind faith in another. I think most people will need to
know exactly how the new licensing works to be comfortable with it.
To avoid a lot of calls, and having to explain everything over and over, it
would
Whoops...that should have been CPHZ...
And just to avoid any misunderstanding, we are extremely happy with the
products and services provided by CPHZ...and trust that they will disclose
the info as soon as possible. It's always better to be upfront though -
prepared to disclose info on obvious
Andy,
Upon your phone call with Barry, should we as Declude Users (4 lic. in
my case), contact Barry directly before upgrading or should we await for a post
on this forum for new procedures? I too have a cold spare, however, Declude is
not loaded there until necessary and upon written
An idea from me to the new licence policy from Declude:
Is it perhaps possible to expand the Decludce Pro licence to include one
test system (which only will be used for testing before upgrading and to
test new features, not for business use)) ?
I think this would also help a lot of declude
Hi Keith:
Well - *I* am satisfied that I could switch NICs or servers and any time of
day or night or weekends - without license-related impact on any authorized
use of Declude. I am under a verbal non-disclosure - so I can't elaborate,
besides any statement should come from an official source
This as my comment on many posts about licensing:
I believe Scott and Berry KNOW there are out many unlicensed copies of
Declude. I believe also that only a product with an appropriate revenue can
be maintained and brought forward regulary. (Probably this was a big problem
in the last 12 months)
Hi,
At the end, there are two components to this:
A) the technique used to validate licenses (e.g., an activation code,
hardware detection, etc.)
B) the procedures on how a questionable situation is handled.
I really don't have a problem with ANY technique as long as I can be
comfortable with
