Re: [Declude.Virus] Mysterious

2004-09-27 Thread Bud Durland
R. Scott Perry wrote: ... especially with all these new potential dangerous JPG's floating around (BTW, how common are these, has anyone been picking them up with declude?) I'm not aware of any being picked up with Declude Virus yet. But there was a report earlier today of a trojan horse spre

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mysterious

2004-09-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
I used the label "mysterious" because people (like me) had been highly anticipating the JPEG detection feature - and today we learn purely by accident that there are new interim and "release" releases. FYI, there was no new interim. Someone went to the URL to get an interim, saw that it wasn't w

Re: [Declude.Virus] Mysterious

2004-09-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Yes Scott, thank you for updating Declude as well. I would prefer to have notifications of new releases go out ASAP to the lists, so that we as customers can decide if they are a priority to get installed... I agree. :) If I had been the one deciding, I would likely have notified the lists f

Re: [Declude.Virus] Mysterious

2004-09-27 Thread Jim Matuska
stems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:32 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mysterious Sorry - new thread, as requested. I used the label "mysterious" bec

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mysterious

2004-09-27 Thread Andy Schmidt
Sorry - new thread, as requested. I used the label "mysterious" because people (like me) had been highly anticipating the JPEG detection feature - and today we learn purely by accident that there are new interim and "release" releases. Mystery is an appropriate word, since I (the customer) know o