sign@global.libreoffice.org
> > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-design] "Document Saved" indicator
> >
> > On 06/04/2012 08:54 AM, nick rundy wrote:
> >
> > > But you say it is not reliable to rely on the save icon to show
> modification status? That the statu
ore has to follow the
"icon rules"?
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:13:43 -0400
> From: kohei.yosh...@gmail.com
> To: design@global.libreoffice.org
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-design] "Document Saved" indicator
>
> On 06/04/2012 08:54 AM, nick rundy wrote:
>
>
On 06/04/2012 08:54 AM, nick rundy wrote:
But you say it is not reliable to rely on the save icon to show modification
status? That the status bar is a more accurate indicator of this?
Yes. For now it's the indicator in the status bar. And (as I
understand it) folks here are discussing abo
correct judgment or
not, it is a common induction people are making.
But you say it is not reliable to rely on the save icon to show modification
status? That the status bar is a more accurate indicator of this?
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-design] "Document Saved" indicato
On 06/03/2012 12:11 PM, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote:
Hi all,
@Christoph:
Well, that was the case some versions ago - then the current behavior
(save icon is always active) has been introduced. Reason: There has been
customer feedback targeted at the Sun OOo UX Team that people wish to
press tha
Hi all,
@Christoph:
> Well, that was the case some versions ago - then the current behavior
> (save icon is always active) has been introduced. Reason: There has been
> customer feedback targeted at the Sun OOo UX Team that people wish to
> press that button at any time - just to be sure that the
On 06/03/2012 11:25 AM, Mirek M. wrote:
2012/6/3 Jean-Francois Nifenecker
Le 31/05/2012 21:29, Kohei Yoshida a écrit :
There is another reason for that. Document not only store its content
but also view properties, but a change in the view properties doesn't
trigger a document modified stat
2012/6/3 Jean-Francois Nifenecker
> Le 31/05/2012 21:29, Kohei Yoshida a écrit :
>
>
>> There is another reason for that. Document not only store its content
>> but also view properties, but a change in the view properties doesn't
>> trigger a document modified status. Here, view properties inc
Le 31/05/2012 21:29, Kohei Yoshida a écrit :
There is another reason for that. Document not only store its content
but also view properties, but a change in the view properties doesn't
trigger a document modified status. Here, view properties include
things like (in case of spreadsheet) active
Hi Kendy, hi all!
Back at the computer ...
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2012, 15:29 -0400 schrieb Kohei Yoshida:
[...]
> There is another reason for that. Document not only store its content
> but also view properties, but a change in the view properties doesn't
> trigger a document modified status.
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 22:54 -0400, Jay Lozier wrote:
> The grayed out Save button in LO also indicates that the document in
> unchanged since the last change. This is a very handy at a glance
> feature to know the save status.
*sigh* I guess the mis-use is very much prevalent.
Since we are now
On 05/31/2012 10:29 PM, Coheir Yoshi wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:13 PM, nick rundy wrote:
>> A grayed out Save Indicator is not superfluous!
>>
>> I find this EXTRAORDINARILY useful to know whether I have added new material
>> to a document or whether I'm dealing with the previously saved
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:13 PM, nick rundy wrote:
>
> A grayed out Save Indicator is not superfluous!
>
> I find this EXTRAORDINARILY useful to know whether I have added new material
> to a document or whether I'm dealing with the previously saved version. The
> grayed out Indicator communicate
grayed out Save Indicator is one of the best features of Writer!
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-design] "Document Saved" indicator
> From: christ...@dogmatux.com
> To: design@global.libreoffice.org
> CC: ke...@suse.cz; android2...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:14:
Hi there,
Let me chime in since I'm the one who put that setting there.
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 21:04 +0200, Christoph Noack wrote:
> Hi Mirek, all!
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2012, 20:29 +0200 schrieb Mirek M.:
> > 2012/5/31 Christoph Noack
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 16:42 +0200 schrie
Hi Mirek, all!
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2012, 20:29 +0200 schrieb Mirek M.:
> 2012/5/31 Christoph Noack
> > Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 16:42 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wilms:
> > > actually, the save icon in the top toolbar should be enough, don't you
> > > think? It's greyed out if there's nothin
Hi Christoph,
2012/5/31 Christoph Noack
> Hi Alex, all!
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 16:42 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wilms:
> > actually, the save icon in the top toolbar should be enough, don't you
> > think? It's greyed out if there's nothing to save and makes the
> > indicator superfluous.
Hi Alex, all!
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 16:42 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wilms:
> actually, the save icon in the top toolbar should be enough, don't you
> think? It's greyed out if there's nothing to save and makes the
> indicator superfluous.
Well, that was the case some versions ago - then th
18 matches
Mail list logo
