[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome Wayland session

2019-09-07 Thread Rachel Greenham
as of this morning's updates, this problem seems to have disappeared. I've been able to log out and back in several times to my ubuntu wayland session, at least on my i915 machine (the dell laptop). nb: this morning's updates updated gnome-session-bin and ubuntu-session to 3.33.92-1ubuntu1, gdm3

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome Wayland session

2019-09-03 Thread Rachel Greenham
My point regarding gnome-session-wayland.target is that if we're seeing different filenames for that file (assuming they're functionally the same) and mine definitely comes from gnome-session-bin, does that suggest we're running different gnome-session-bin versions? And seeing as you're not

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome Wayland session

2019-09-03 Thread Rachel Greenham
minor contextual note: It took me a little while to get the other machine, ssh in (offending ssh key to resolve), call up this page to remind me of the exact commands. The point of which is to say, these weren't taken *immediately* after the logout, but at least a minute later, certainly beyond

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome Wayland session

2019-09-03 Thread Rachel Greenham
journalctl -b output as attached loginctl as below: rachel in ~ at rainbow ➜ loginctl SESSION UID USER SEAT TTY 1 1000 rachel seat0 tty2 3 1000 rachel pts/0 2 sessions listed. rachel in ~ at rainbow ➜ loginctl show-session 1 Id=1 User=1000 Name=rachel Timestamp=Tue 2019

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome Wayland session

2019-09-03 Thread Rachel Greenham
It is definitely /usr/lib/systemd/user-gnome-session-wayland.target. dpkg -S on that file gives gnome-session-bin which is on version 3.33.90-2ubuntu2. dpkg -S on the .service file gives no match. This problem didn't start on upgrade to the 5.2 kernels, which happened a few weeks(?) earlier, but

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome Wayland session

2019-09-03 Thread Rachel Greenham
With --systemd removed as directed I still ended up stuck on a black screen, except this time it had a flashing white text cursor in the top left. (BTW reboots occurred between each test, somewhat perforce...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome Wayland session

2019-09-03 Thread Rachel Greenham
I tried (just now) deliberately leaving it longer than 30 seconds to come back after a logout. In fact left it longer than 60 seconds. Nothing happening. I wasn't logged in via ssh as well at the time (I hadn't thought the systemd --user instance was related to the ssh session before so presumably

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome

2019-09-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
the i915 one (Dell XPS 13 9370) is the one with automatic login enabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841915 Title: black screen, unresponsive, after logout

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome

2019-09-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
... and the other affected machine (just checked it's still affected today after latest updates) ** Attachment added: "lspcik-dell.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1841915/+attachment/5286167/+files/lspcik-dell.txt -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome

2019-09-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
As attached. ** Attachment added: "lspcik.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1841915/+attachment/5286165/+files/lspcik.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome

2019-09-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
Only affects Wayland sessions, not x11. I should have mentioned it earlier, it's been my default for some time now (because #1827428 which still affects latest 19.10) and I forgot. It also seems not to be the upstream bug, unless the discussion there is going off in the wrong directions. They now

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome

2019-08-30 Thread Rachel Greenham
there are no crash files relating to when this happens. Currently sitting at the machine that *doesn't* have autologin enabled, where it's just happened again, there is nothing in /var/crash relating to this. (nextcloud client keeps crashing, and there are crash files relating to that, the most

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome

2019-08-30 Thread Rachel Greenham
additionally as it does seem to involve console switching and you might think kernel to be relevant to that, i tried again after the most recent kernel upgrade in 19.10 (5.2.20-15-generic). no change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 1841915] Re: black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome

2019-08-29 Thread Rachel Greenham
Network connection does not die. (It appeared to first time but I think that's just my ongoing random - and irrelevant here - avahi issues on this machine.) But gnome-shell is *not* running after triggering the bug, so sudo killall on it just produces "gnome-shell: no process found". So that was

[Bug 1841915] [NEW] black screen, unresponsive, after logout from gnome

2019-08-29 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: on logout the screen is black, the system is unresponsive and has to be restarted. (Untested by me yet, but I expect ssh-ing in and restarting gdm would work.) I believe this may be already reported upstream here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745554 That's

[Bug 1827428] Re: Mouse cursor left frozen copy of itself

2019-08-06 Thread Rachel Greenham
A bit more detail to reproduce this that I think was missed out before: It happens when the configured desktop mode/scaling is set to a fractional value. You can have that experimental xrandr setting set, but be configured to scaling of 100% or 200% (but see below on latter) and you won't see

[Bug 1827428] Re: [nvidia] Mouse cursor left frozen copy of itself

2019-08-06 Thread Rachel Greenham
My bug got marked a duplicate of this one but with the latest change that might be wrong: It affected me on a machine with AMD graphics, not nVidia. BTW I recently tried it again on the offchance it had been fixed since (by re-enabling the xrandr scaling setting), and it had not. Also not fixed on

[Bug 1827099] Re: package shared-mime-info 1.10-1 failed to install/upgrade: triggers looping, abandoned

2019-05-30 Thread Rachel Greenham
ditto upgrading in two steps bionic->cosmic->disco -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shared-mime-info in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827099 Title: package shared-mime-info 1.10-1 failed to

[Bug 1829221] Re: second, dead, mouse pointer left on screen after login, x11 session

2019-05-15 Thread Rachel Greenham
It does appear to be related to the xrandr scaling experimental feature, after all. Revert that to default and the issue disappears. Guessing that probably makes it a mutter bug, and being of an experimental feature at that is hopefully of interest to someone but not urgent. In view of that didn't

[Bug 1829221] [NEW] second, dead, mouse pointer left on screen after login, x11 session

2019-05-15 Thread Rachel Greenham
difference. In the Displays Prefs there is no second "Unknown" display to disable. (The machine has precisely one display, and that's all Settings sees. It's a desktop, not a laptop, and it only has an AMD Vega integrated graphics. It also has only one mouse.) rachel@twilight:~$ xinput --list ⎡

[Bug 1817924] Re: apps launched from gnome shell do not get input focus

2019-03-12 Thread Rachel Greenham
i didn't freshly install to see it but i did create a new user, to be sure I had utterly default settings and yes, it's there right from the get-go with certain apps including terminal. but only in x11 (which of course *is* still the default in ubuntu). I switched to wayland and this problem went

[Bug 1763892] Re: 144Hz/120Hz monitor but mutter seems to cap rendering at 60FPS

2019-03-06 Thread Rachel
mutter 3.30.2-1~ubuntu18.10.4 doesn't appear to solve this issue in ubuntu budgie. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1763892 Title: 144Hz/120Hz monitor but mutter

[Bug 1818517] [NEW] "Network Login" browser does not remember cookies

2019-03-04 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: This is with respect to the gnome-shell-portal-helper, part of the gnome-shell package, which opens its own browser window to prompt for a wifi hotspot login. It all works fine except one little papercut: Could it remember cookies? So when I go back to the same hotspot most

[Bug 1817924] Re: apps launched from gnome shell do not get input focus

2019-03-03 Thread Rachel Greenham
Bug only affects X11 sessions. I had a random urge to try out Wayland again. This issue does not arise in Wayland. Apps that were affected under X11 are taking input focus quite happily when launched from shell in Wayland. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 1817924] Re: apps launched from gnome shell do not get input focus

2019-02-28 Thread Rachel Greenham
it's not generally slow enough for the latter to be an issue. :-) Even if I just go nice and slow. Click... window opens... it doesn't have focus... It continues to not have focus until I do something that would give it focus in the normal fashion, like clicking on it, clicking on its dock

[Bug 1817924] Re: apps launched from gnome shell do not get input focus

2019-02-28 Thread Rachel Greenham
sublime text, slack also immune, firefox, thunderbird are not... so ok it's not universal but *lots* of apps are affected, and the pattern doesn't seem to be gnome/not-gnome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell

[Bug 1817924] Re: apps launched from gnome shell do not get input focus

2019-02-28 Thread Rachel Greenham
confirmed, gedit seems to be immune for some reason. pretty much anything else i tried is not; calculator, terminal, libreoffice, nautilus... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1817924] Re: apps launched from gnome shell do not get input focus

2019-02-28 Thread Rachel Greenham
FYI problem remains with all those extensions removed. BTW one does tend to notice it most with apps you type into. I first noticed with terminal, where I'm used to click, then start typing, and it's suddenly become click, click-again, then start typing. With an app you'd tend first to click into

[Bug 1817924] Re: apps launched from gnome shell do not get input focus

2019-02-27 Thread Rachel Greenham
NB: If you launch an app from a terminal, eg: gnome-calculator, it *does* then get the input focus; just not when launched from gnome- shell. That's why I didn't think it was a mutter bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1817924] [NEW] apps launched from gnome shell do not get input focus

2019-02-27 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: Observed on upgrading to disco-proposed today... When launching an app from the dock or from the applications grid (so i believe it's a gnome-shell thing rather than a dock thing), the app opens, but does not get the input focus. You have to either click in the window, or

Re: [Bug 1814088] Re: totem crashed with SIGSEGV in tcache_get() [assertion "nqueue != NULL" failed in g_object_new_internal]

2019-02-01 Thread Rachel Greenham
True. And I can confirm it's not listed in my plugins at all. (There's just Cisco OpenH264 and Widevine). Only potentially-relevant extension is Disable HTML5 Autoplay, which if anything should *stop* any video being played before it gets to the software that does it. Only other thing that

Re: [Bug 1814088] Re: totem crashed with SIGSEGV in tcache_get() [assertion "nqueue != NULL" failed in g_object_new_internal]

2019-02-01 Thread Rachel Greenham
I agree it's a bit of a nightmare. It was the start of the day and I literally just had Firefox-Next open, and Slack (using the app, not via Firefox). No video had been posted to slack. I can only think some random embedded video went by on the timeline or activities column in tweetdeck (the

[Bug 1723615] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in meta_monitor_mode_get_resolution()

2018-08-03 Thread Rachel Greenham
Sure, just thought I'd better say something as it was my report originally. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723615 Title: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in

[Bug 1723615] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in meta_monitor_mode_get_resolution()

2018-08-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
FWIW I can't reproduce this any more either; since 18.04 in fact I've had no problems with gnome-shell crashing. The monitor very nearly always does wake up when it's supposed to now (some difference in the dpms signal being sent? Previously it would always wake for windows and just had a hard

[Bug 1773503] [NEW] should offer restart after system firmware upgrade

2018-05-26 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: The Software app launched by itself this morning to offer me a system firmware (uefi bios) update of my Dell 9370. Presumably in its role as a front-end to fwupd. That's not the bug, that's brilliant, that's pretty much my last remaining reason to keep a Windows partition

[Bug 1767264] Re: Window manager refresh rate is different from monitor refresh rate

2018-05-16 Thread Rachel
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1763892 144Hz/120Hz monitor but Wayland sessions seem to cap rendering at 60FPS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767264

[Bug 1767264] Re: Window manager refresh rate is different from monitor refresh rate

2018-05-13 Thread Rachel
Related, but not the same as in Ubuntu this is affecting xorg as well. Not just wayland. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767264 Title: Window manager refresh rate

[Bug 1767693] Re: 18.04 GNOME displays at 60fps even if the monitor is set to 144hz

2018-05-07 Thread Rachel
Can confirm this is an issue in ubuntu 18.04. Also affects Ubuntu Budgie (reported it here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntubudgie/+bug/1767264) which uses the same window manager as gnome shell (mutter). Animations/window dragging are locked to 60fps regardless of actual monitor refresh rate

[Bug 1767264] Re: Window manager refresh rate is different from monitor refresh rate

2018-04-27 Thread Rachel
Not sure how relevant, but I tried setting CLUTTER_VBLANK=none to see if forcing the use of my video card's driver would have any effect, but it causes the entire desktop to freeze and need to be force closed. ** Description changed: Ubuntu Budgie 18.04 + budgie-desktop 10.4 The refresh

Re: [Bug 1724439] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in meta_window_get_monitor() from ffi_call_unix64() from ffi_call() from gjs_invoke_c_function() from function_call()

2018-03-15 Thread Rachel Greenham
to use KDE back in the day. -- Rachel On 15/03/18 13:39, dwilches wrote: > ​ > ​ > Rachel, no need to switch to Mac to avoid this problem. What I ended up > doing was this: > > $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports > $ sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade

[Bug 1724439] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in meta_window_get_monitor() from ffi_call_unix64() from ffi_call() from gjs_invoke_c_function() from function_call()

2018-03-15 Thread Rachel Greenham
Well, my bug #1756036 just got (automatically-i-think) marked as a duplicate of this one, and I'm on 18.04 (gnome-shell 3.27.92-0ubuntu1) So that's one, Daniel. ;-) I'd been getting this on some mornings, but the bug report was getting rejected because of outdated packages until this morning.

[Bug 1756036] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in meta_window_get_monitor()

2018-03-15 Thread Rachel Greenham
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1724439 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1724439 Daniel's latest comment on that bug shows that it looks like it doesn't affect 3.27. This is 3.27. It's a shame those attachments got deleted... -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1505409] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGTRAP in x_io_error() from _XIOError() from _XEventsQueued() from XPending() from gdk_check_xpending() ["Connection to xwayland lost"]

2017-11-09 Thread Rachel Greenham
It failed to hold true on day 2 anyway, as today the session didn't survive the overnight sleep. But in any case I re-checked the bug of mine that was marked a duplicate of this one, and saw as it was during one of my brief try-outs with wayland, is irrelevant to my current gnome-session woes, as

[Bug 1505409] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGTRAP in x_io_error() from _XIOError() from _XEventsQueued() from XPending() from gdk_check_xpending() ["Connection to xwayland lost"]

2017-11-08 Thread Rachel Greenham
Interesting For what it's worth: On seeing #44 I tried turning off notification popups and lock screen notifications and left it overnight. On waking I had the usual problems I often (not always) have with my monitors persuading them to wake up (one of them is a model with a known issue with

[Bug 1723615] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in meta_monitor_mode_get_resolution()

2017-11-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
In fact I'm already on 387.22 which, I see from a nearby post on the same forum, has the same fix: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1025794/unix-graphics- announcements-and-news/linux-solaris-and-freebsd-driver-387-22/ It hasn't helped. TBH I don't think it applies as (fx: me reading up

[Bug 1723620] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in meta_window_update_for_monitors_changed()

2017-11-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
Just poking in to say this is still happening, and not magically fixed by Artful's release date. It happened today, but trying to ubuntu-bug the crash file failed. (It just quit when I clicked Continue.) One difference today: Thinking maybe my screen-sleep woes were partly because of gnome shell

[Bug 1717170] Re: gnome-shell crashes with SIGABRT: mutter:ERROR:backends/meta-monitor-manager.c:2274:meta_monitor_manager_get_logical_monitor_from_number: assertion failed: ((unsigned int) number < g

2017-10-15 Thread Rachel Greenham
Adding this to *this* bug, despite the "Fix Released", because it exactly matches the original post for this bug, whereas the others I've encountered and reported on are different: Oct 14 20:02:45 fleetfoot gnome-shell[12750]: meta_monitor_manager_get_logical_monitor_from_number: assertion

[Bug 1717170] Re: gnome-shell crashes with SIGABRT: mutter:ERROR:backends/meta-monitor-manager.c:2274:meta_monitor_manager_get_logical_monitor_from_number: assertion failed: ((unsigned int) number < g

2017-10-14 Thread Rachel Greenham
bug #1723615 came up with this fix in place. Whack-a-mole! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717170 Title: gnome-shell crashes with SIGABRT:

[Bug 1717170] Re: gnome-shell crashes with SIGABRT: mutter:ERROR:backends/meta-monitor-manager.c:2274:meta_monitor_manager_get_logical_monitor_from_number: assertion failed: ((unsigned int) number < g

2017-10-14 Thread Rachel Greenham
I had one crash after applying this yesterday (and rebooting): it crashed right out to the console, not even to the login screen, and when I tried logging in again the session failed to start. But since a second reboot it's apparently been fine. This bug went away, and so too has my bug #1720149

[Bug 1722779] [NEW] Xorg session exits on login if nvidia modeset=1

2017-10-11 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: This may relate to this item in the changelog for this version of gdm3: * Drop 95_hide_x11_sessions_with_nvidia_kdms.patch: - No longer needed with nvidia-384 I noticed before this version that indeed, if I enabled modeset on nvidia-387 (which actually worked), I only

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-10-11 Thread Rachel Greenham
It just happened, so attached the crash file that was generated. NB: gnome-shell 3.26.1-0ubuntu2 mutter 3.26.1-1 libmutter-1-0 3.26.1-1 NB: I notice there's also a libmutter-0-0 installed, possibly a hangover from the original zesty install. but ldd $(which gnome-shell) indicates it's linked to

Re: [Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-10-10 Thread Rachel Greenham
I’m afk today but will try to get this information on Wednesday. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720149 Title: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-10-09 Thread Rachel Greenham
That wouldn't surprise me. I've seen other reports, on IRC, to the same effect. Sadly, displayport is not optional here, not if I actually want to run my monitors at full resolution. Someone mentioned it being a "known bug" in mutter? However they didn't link to it and I wasn't at the keyboard at

[Bug 1720760] Re: Under Xorg app windows unscaled until gnome tweaks is launched.

2017-10-07 Thread Rachel Greenham
Seems to have gone away with recent upgrades. I can't tell exactly which as I was attempting to use wayland under amd and even under nvidia-387 (which worked fine except for a couple of random system freezes during closing windows). Back on nvidia/xorg because of that (although not exhaustively

[Bug 1721602] [NEW] When creating web application, should inherit cookies for site

2017-10-05 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: I wanted to use GnomeWeb to run Tweetdeck as a saved web application. So I installed epiphany-browser, navigated to tweetdeck.twitter.com, logged in, and then attempted to save it as a web application. This all seemed to work, as well as Tweetdeck itself running apparently

[Bug 1721577] [NEW] switch monitor configurations crash-freezes desktop

2017-10-05 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: I hit p by accident. I'll be removing the keybinding now I found it, in org.gnome.mutter.keybindings switch-monitor. It's too common a keystroke I hit when working under macOS that I'm just too likely to hit it by accident. But that's my problem. But it wouldn't be a problem

[Bug 1505409] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGTRAP in x_io_error() from _XIOError() from _XEventsQueued() from XPending() from gdk_check_xpending() ["Connection to xwayland lost"]

2017-10-05 Thread Rachel Greenham
/var/log/history.log section as per above post ** Attachment added: "part-history.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1505409/+attachment/4962744/+files/part-history.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 1505409] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGTRAP in x_io_error() from _XIOError() from _XEventsQueued() from XPending() from gdk_check_xpending() ["Connection to xwayland lost"]

2017-10-05 Thread Rachel Greenham
I got here because my apport-raised bug #1721492 apparently automatically got marked as a duplicate of this. I'm not so sure: This happened after a kernel upgrade to 4.13.0-14-generic. Yesterday I was happily using this system in a wayland session using nouveau. On reboot with this update, all I

[Bug 1720760] [NEW] Under Xorg app windows unscaled until gnome tweaks is launched.

2017-10-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: Today I learned from omgubuntu how to reset my gnome/ubuntu desktop settings (dconf reset -f /), and thought I'd do it, seeing as I had upgraded from a Zesty install at an earlier stage of 17.10's pre-release period, and further customised as time went on in the normal way of

[Bug 1720760] Re: Under Xorg app windows unscaled until gnome tweaks is launched.

2017-10-02 Thread Rachel Greenham
Attaching second screenshot referred to in original post... ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2017-10-02 11-04-16.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1720760/+attachment/4960369/+files/Screenshot%20from%202017-10-02%2011-04-16.png -- You received this bug

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-10-01 Thread Rachel Greenham
ok, same symptoms occurred with the default theme. So after all it looks like the shell theme has nothing to do with it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720149

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-10-01 Thread Rachel Greenham
well I spoke too soon. Crash occurred with the locally 'built' arc theme. Slightly different though in that this time it *did* hang the system. But it started with the same segv message logged. So back to the default+Ambiance theme to test that for longer. Problem with trying to prove a negative.

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-10-01 Thread Rachel Greenham
arc-theme package uninstalled and instead arc gtk & shell themes installed manually as directed in its github page via autogen. This appears not to be triggering the crash. even though the autogen doesn't know any gnome > 3.22. It may be that similarly rebuilding the arc-theme package for a gnome

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-09-30 Thread Rachel Greenham
I think my modeset=1 test earlier was invalid; I don't think that change was ever applied. It *did* get applied just now with a routine dist- upgrade, which included an update to console-setup, which forced update- initramfs. And then the system was unbootable except via the recovery system.

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-09-30 Thread Rachel Greenham
It may be the Arc shell theme, in interaction with nVidia: I was unable to reproduce the problem on the Macbook Pro using Xorg gnome session, and that still with the Arc shell theme. Both a short (few minutes) and long (greater than one hour) display sleeps tested. I was also unable to reproduce

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-09-29 Thread Rachel Greenham
That would appear to be very different from what we're trying to report here: 1. It's not hanging. It's presumably exiting, forcing a logout, and it all happens before the monitors are awake enough to show a picture. We're not in a hung state at any point. 2. It's not only suspend, it's wake

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-09-29 Thread Rachel Greenham
neither change made a difference in the end. the needs-root-rights change (instead of, not as well as, modeset) didn't help either, after a long sleep. Why instead-of not as-well-as? Because the manpage for Xwrapper.config said that its default setting of 'auto' turns needs-root-rights off is kms

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-09-29 Thread Rachel Greenham
... and the answer is no. After a longer display-sleep i woke it up to find myself back at the login prompt. Definitely that and not the lock screen. This may in part be related to long-term issues I have with this monitor. Early-revision Dell P2715Q 4K monitors have known firmware- related

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-09-29 Thread Rachel Greenham
harder to have a working Xorg system again. :-) But I hadn't tried turning modeset on and still use xorg; I didn't know there was a point in doing so. It seems to be happy. BTW FWIW rachel@fleetfoot:~$ apt-cache policy nvidia-384 nvidia-384: Installed: 384.90-0ubuntu0~gpu17.10.1 Candidate: 384.90

[Bug 1720149] Re: gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-09-28 Thread Rachel Greenham
I can't reproduce this in Xorg on my non-nvidia machine (on which I normally run Wayland because I can). It appears to be nvidia specific. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1720149] [NEW] gnome-shell segv on wake from display or system sleep

2017-09-28 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: The observable symptom is that if I go away and let the computer go either to display sleep or suspend, when I come back and try to wake it up again, I find myself, after sliding up the lock screen, at the gdm login screen. I'm logged out, and logging in gives me a fresh new

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25, 3.26

2017-09-27 Thread Rachel Greenham
I just got the mutter upgrade to 3.26.0+20170925~ea214fb-1. My gnome- shell text was too big! So I reverted my local modification to the theme's gnome-shell.css ;-) and now the gnome-shell text is the correct size. I presume this build includes the abovementioned patch. As this is, I think, the

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25, 3.26

2017-09-26 Thread Rachel Greenham
I'm looking forward to seeing how much the upstream changes fixes all these. Yes, I also saw some of the other transient effects noted above; the gnome-shell text part of it was just the bit I managed to isolate and find consistency in. :-) I had seen the need to apply scaling twice - sometimes,

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25

2017-09-23 Thread Rachel Greenham
I'd like to give a fresh description of this bug. I think I can do so more concisely, as it affects gnome-shell. I was in two minds about whether to report it as a new bug, but honestly feared if I did so it would just be marked a duplicate of this one and ignored. :-) Also to update for current

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25

2017-09-06 Thread Rachel Greenham
No wait, I've bethought me, actually. Partly brought on by issues with nvidia/wayland that weren't immediately obvious - nouveau is actually working better for me, if noticeably a bit more sluggish. Regarding your comment: "I think that GNOME Shell 3.25.90 doesn't really support HiDPI for X,

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25

2017-09-06 Thread Rachel Greenham
(though probably *unrelated*, I meant) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713323 Title: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25 To manage

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25

2017-09-06 Thread Rachel Greenham
Brad's comment: No, I've not seen the act of merely *launching* the gnome tweak tool fix or alter anything in any way. In fact, though probably related, the latest update seems to have broken its Extensions tab, but that's another bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25

2017-09-05 Thread Rachel Greenham
I care slightly less than I used to because I just now persuaded ubuntu wayland session to run on nvidia-384 proprietary drivers. :-) Something which I presume is intended to be the default behaviour at some point, or at least for Nouveau. So since I reported this bug the move to gnome 3.25 has

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25

2017-09-05 Thread Rachel Greenham
... or if you meant does the gnome tweak tool *itself* appear with its user interface elements at the correct size or too small? It shows at the correct size, including the titlebar... but actually contrary to my original report *all* titlebars, both the system and integrated type, are now being

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25

2017-09-05 Thread Rachel Greenham
The only scaling setting in tweak tool is the one in the Fonts section, which appears to be exposing org.gnome.desktop.interface text-scaling- factor. It scales the *text*. It scales all text relative to its original size. So if I set it to 2.0 the text that's half size will be the correct size,

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade to Gnome 3.25

2017-09-05 Thread Rachel Greenham
Hope I'm not being overly pedantic: The upgrade that originally broke it, that I applied on Aug 27, did *not* include gnome-shell. If it had it would have been an obvious culprit and I would have reported the bug against that instead of gnome- session. So at the time I originally reported this

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade

2017-08-30 Thread Rachel Greenham
Spoke slightly too soon. It's fine on the Wayland machine, but a bit more unstable on the nvidia/xorg machine, and I seem to need to select the scale percentage twice before it properly takes effect, and it looks like under some circumstances it can revert to the state described in the original

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade

2017-08-29 Thread Rachel Greenham
I can confirm that including gnome3-staging solves most of my HiDPI issues. Nearly everything seems to work now, according to the setting in the control panel -> peripherals -> display tab. I don't know what that is exposing in gsettings (if it is); nothing obvious. It's certainly *not*

[Bug 1713323] Re: HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade

2017-08-29 Thread Rachel Greenham
I was changing the settings from the commandline via gsettings eg: gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface scaling-factor 2 gsettings reset org.gnome.desktop.interface scaling-factor etc. etc. That setting never was exposed in the user interface, to my knowledge. Rather uselessly the

[Bug 1713323] [NEW] HiDPI support partially broken after upgrade

2017-08-27 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: After an upgrade this morning that took in the new version of this package, and a suite of gnome-session/gnome-settings packages, which may also be implicated, support for scaling on HiDPI screens seems to have partially failed. Partially. BTW I invoked the bug reporter with

[Bug 1712607] [NEW] gnome keyring goes awol after a few logout/logins

2017-08-23 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: First symptom noticed: That *sometimes* after logging in, owncloud- client would fail to connect to the server, after a delay asking instead for a password with the message something like (sorry don't have it in front of me) "keyring service unavailable". Second symptom, on

[Bug 1712271] [NEW] ubuntu dock uses (some) settings from dashtodock

2017-08-22 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: Dash to dock already installed and in use in the past, configured to be along the bottom of the screen. Trying out ubuntu dock (after turning dash to dock off), it *also* sits along the bottom of the screen. Changing the position setting in dash to dock's settings, even

[Bug 1291359] [NEW] multiscreen spanning wallpaper does not span on lock screen

2014-03-12 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: (It has same look as unity-greeter in lightdm but am given to believe lock screen is handled by gnome-screensaver; move if i'm wrong! lightdm seems to get it wrong a different way.) If, having made a wide wallpaper to span multiple monitors, and having set it as your

[Bug 1193522] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_action_get_name()

2013-10-21 Thread Rachel Greenham
don't even care any more; switched to ownCloud. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193522 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_action_get_name() To

[Bug 1222776] [NEW] gnome-disk-utlity and launcher/nautilus lost all raid awareness

2013-09-09 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: Expected: Raid arrays have appropriate icons in launcher/disk utility etc. Used to be there in Precise Actual: Icons are missing. Raid array has generic drive icon. Compare the first screenshot, taken before upgrading from Precise to Quantal, and the second, taken

[Bug 1222776] Re: gnome-disk-utlity and launcher/nautilus lost all raid awareness

2013-09-09 Thread Rachel Greenham
Second screenshot attached, showing same system post-quantal upgrade, missing all raid icons and apparent desktop functionality. ** Attachment added: Screen Shot 2013-09-09 at 12.39.54.png

[Bug 1222776] Re: gnome-disk-utlity and launcher/nautilus lost all raid awareness

2013-09-09 Thread Rachel Greenham
OK, I'll upgrade this test vm all the way to saucy and see what happens. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222776 Title: gnome-disk-utlity and

[Bug 1222776] Re: gnome-disk-utlity and launcher/nautilus lost all raid awareness

2013-09-09 Thread Rachel Greenham
Confirmed; launcher icon has returned; well, it's a new icon, but it's meaningful, so that's my main issue sorted. :-) I note still no raid understanding in gnome-disk-utility - array just shows up as a Block Device. Not terribly important to me but I guess that's just been a decision to take

Re: [Bug 682788] Re: Improve Unity menus

2012-09-16 Thread Rachel Greenham
to be pretty in the titlebar! But we're way off-topic with that here... -- Rachel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682788 Title: Improve Unity menus To manage

[Bug 682788] Re: Improve Unity menus

2012-09-15 Thread Rachel Greenham
[x] option to show the damn global menu all the time i believe that was the original complaint here; recently there's been all these other options thrown in like someone *wanted* to muddy the issue. LIM fwiw is a cute variation on the theme of having the menu on the window, but which is just

[Bug 682788] Re: Improve Unity menus

2012-09-15 Thread Rachel Greenham
fwiw i'd also say that for consistency's sake leave the default as-is - not least for the reviews, where you'd have a choice between They changed the way menus work *again* and While the default menu behaviour remains the same as before, there are now some user- configurable options to answer

[Bug 1011257] Re: x-gvfs-show option doesn't work

2012-06-12 Thread Rachel Greenham
Further findings. I think the reason why x-gvfs-show doesn't work is that package util- linux needs to be upgraded to 2.21+ to support the x-gvfs options. In the meantime I tried changing the option in my /etc/fstab to comment =gvfs-show, which seems to be the way to do it for older versions of

[Bug 1011257] [NEW] x-gvfs-show option doesn't work

2012-06-10 Thread Rachel Greenham
Public bug reported: was reporting a separate bug #1010858 about double icons appearing for mounted filesystems, and it occurred to me that it was happening for volumes I had listed in /etc/fstab with uhelper=udisks, the mechanism i used in previous versions to mount internal drives and see them

[Bug 1011257] Re: x-gvfs-show option doesn't work

2012-06-10 Thread Rachel Greenham
** Attachment added: gnome-disks-options.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011257/+attachment/3183733/+files/gnome-disks-options.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1011257] Re: x-gvfs-show option doesn't work

2012-06-10 Thread Rachel Greenham
Additional note: making it work a different way half-worked. Using gnome-disk-utility to set mount options to generate the /etc/fstab line: LABEL=Spinner /media/Spinner auto nosuid,nodev,nofail,uhelper=udisks2 0 0 did allow the drive to mount from the disk utility; but after reboot, I still got

  1   2   >