On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 2:31 AM wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:57 PM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > Seriously Michael, you’re embarrassing yourself.
>
> I don't feel very embarrassed. Your suggested alternative name, "main,"
> is clearly considered to be offensive by at least one of the very
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:57 PM, Bastien Nocera
wrote:
Seriously Michael, you’re embarrassing yourself.
I don't feel very embarrassed. Your suggested alternative name, "main,"
is clearly considered to be offensive by at least one of the very same
people who don't like "master," and who
Am Fr., 3. Mai 2019 um 15:36 Uhr schrieb Carmen Bianca Bakker
:
>
> Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 14:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera skribis:
> > [...]
> > If we agree that the "master" in the git branch name is the same
> > "master" that's used in "master copy" meaning "the original", "the one
> > medium that
> On 4 May 2019, at 00:29, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:09 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> - And to what?
>> A few possible names were mentioned/used. "mainline" was thought to
>> have strong connections to drug use, "release" (use in the contributor
>> covenant)
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:09 AM, Bastien Nocera
wrote:
- And to what?
A few possible names were mentioned/used. "mainline" was thought to
have strong connections to drug use, "release" (use in the contributor
covenant) seems to restrictive (we also do releases from other
branches). I like
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 15:35 +0200, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
> Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 14:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera skribis:
> > >
> > If we agree that the "master" in the git branch name is the same
> > "master" that's used in "master copy" meaning "the original", "the
> > one
> > medium that
Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 14:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera skribis:
> > Can this assertion be backed up by anything substantive? This keeps
> > being said, and I'm willing to believe it, but no actual arguments
> > are
> > being made as to _why_ this is.
> >
> > Specifically, this question needs an
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:08 AM Carmen Bianca Bakker
wrote:
> The shitstorm is to be expected one way or another. The only difference
> would be whether GNOME or The Linux Foundation is smeared in internet
> comments as "SJWs changing things and I don't like it".
Better us than them, because
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 14:07 +0200, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
> Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 12:09 +0200, Bastien Nocera skribis:
> > - Why?
> >
> > For the same reasons we'd want to change master/slave references.
> > Though it usually isn't paired up with "slave" (excluding the
> > "gitslave" addon),
Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 12:09 +0200, Bastien Nocera skribis:
> - Why?
>
> For the same reasons we'd want to change master/slave references.
> Though it usually isn't paired up with "slave" (excluding the
> "gitslave" addon), it still has strong connotations of subjugation, and
> some ties with the
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 08:36 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García via desktop-
devel-list wrote:
> The problem is that he is not only writting a summary. He has renamed
> master branch in GitLab, he has noticed people in Ubuntu about this
> change, he has ignored us when we have said his arguments about
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 12:48 +0100, Richard Hughes via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 12:38, Michael Gratton wrote:
> > They have also been successful in getting other projects to use
> > more
> > inclusive language. For example, MongoDB initially refused to stop
> > using the
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 21:58 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 21:52, Michael Gratton wrote:
> > On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:48, Richard Hughes
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 12:38, Michael Gratton wrote:
> > > > They have also been successful in getting other
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 11:46 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to formally propose as a GNOME Goal that GNOME modules
> replace references to the terms "master" and "slave". [...] The scope
> would be to replace occurrences of the terms appearing [...] git
> repositories
I
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 08:47 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García via desktop-
devel-list wrote:
>
>
> El mié., 1 may. 2019 a las 14:39, Michael Gratton ()
> escribió:
> > On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 14:30, Carmen Bianca Bakker
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I think the problem is that, when prompted why we
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 10:08 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:08 AM, Michael Gratton wrote:
> > This has already been covered in the original proposal under
> > objection (1) "It doesn't matter". As has already been discussed,
> > what actually doesn't matter is what
El mié., 1 may. 2019 a las 14:39, Michael Gratton () escribió:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 14:30, Carmen Bianca Bakker
> wrote:
> >
> > I think the problem is that, when prompted why we should make this
> > change, you said that we need only look at Python to see why this
> > change is good. But
El mié., 1 may. 2019 a las 3:49, Ask Hjorth Larsen ()
escribió:
> Am Mi., 1. Mai 2019 um 01:07 Uhr schrieb Michael Gratton :
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 17:53, Daniel Mustieles García
> > wrote:
> > > What has happened with this? We have a repo with a non-standard
> > > branch name and no
El mié., 1 may. 2019 a las 1:06, Michael Gratton () escribió:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 17:53, Daniel Mustieles García
> wrote:
> > What has happened with this? We have a repo with a non-standard
> > branch name and no consensus for a global change, do we?
>
> Just trying to find the time to
El mié., 1 may. 2019 a las 4:58, Germán Poo-Caamaño ()
escribió:
> On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 03:49 +0200, Ask Hjorth Larsen via desktop-devel-
> list wrote:
> > Am Mi., 1. Mai 2019 um 01:07 Uhr schrieb Michael Gratton <
> > m...@vee.net>:
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 17:53, Daniel Mustieles García
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
