am/was involved in. Make it harder for users to use non-free but
convenient services is a great way to decrease your userbase, but
providing *better* services than the non-free ones and competing on the
market might be more sustainable. I won't stop you from doing that.
andre
--
Andre Klapper
Hi,
I've published a draft for the GNOME 3.9/3.10 schedule to
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointNine#Schedule
In case of no feedback this will become the final schedule in a few
days.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
GNOME good, easy, beautiful for everybody, not
just for people who already know and care about software freedom.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
from tarballs [1], or set the moduleset
value in ~/.jhbuildrc to gnome-2-32 to compile from git.
andre
[1]
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/teams/releng/2.32.1/sample-tarball-stable.jhbuildrc
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
distributors who ship enterprise / long-term
support versions. Same problem e.g. for gnome-vfs, libgnome, ...
I guess if somebody offered maintainership, nobody would refuse.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
bug is put in front of you?
No, it's not the topic but your tone. Don't mix that up.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org
=librsvg ), or to issue a
call for new blood (or invite active patch writers to co-maintainership)
if there is no interest in maintainership anymore.
I'm not aware of any alternative recommended within GNOME currently.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
elaborate on this?
See https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Guidelines/ApplicationName
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 12:46 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Side question: why those are called blockers if they do not block
the release on Monday?
Do you have a better word? shouldfix'es?
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 01:11 +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
Are you kidding?
Could you use respectful language please, in case you also expect others
to take you seriously?
Thanks,
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 16:30 +, Przemo Firszt wrote:
What about submitting patches using git send-email (default method for
linux kernel). Is it possible?
See https://live.gnome.org/Git/Developers - you could use the git-bz
extension.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http
it?
http://www.debian.org/support#irc states that you could use
irc.debian.org . I'd recommend trying to connect with other IRC clients
if you think this might be an xchat-gnome issue.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 02:00 -0700, Manish Sinha wrote:
I just wanted to know if pessulus has any future roadmap?
No, see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691543
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
)
* rhythmbox (2)
* totem (1)
* vala (1)
* website: mail.gnome.org (1)
-andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
://live.gnome.org/action/recall/Git/FAQ?action=recallrev=29#How_do_I_add_a_description_to_the_git_web_view.3F__What_is_this_.22blah.doap.22.3F
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 18:44 +, David King wrote:
On 2013-02-13 11:58, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
When I checked three months ago, 79 of 654 non-archived Git modules had
no DOAP file at all. 287 out of 575 modules with a DOAP file had an
entry for bug-database. GNOME does not even
%)
pygobject: 165 → 99 ( -66; -40.0%)
Evolution: 2148 → 1358 (-790; -36.8%)
pango: 286 → 183 (-103; -36.0%)
This also explains that for once we have more closed than open reports
in a year.
Enjoy 2013!,
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http
http://build.gnome.org/ mentions 3.6 (past), the Fedora one seems to be
offline, and the Debian one has not been updated since October.
Does anybody feel responsible for this?
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
improvements from the last
three upstream release notes to explain why I push for upgrading.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
code.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-specific implementations
like expecting the existence of the GNOME Target custom field etc.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org
that the
GNOME extension is needed.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
! The proper way to handle this would be to have Gmail actually
support the 'References' header.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
Andre Klapper | ak
the real message that you wanted to express.
Please read
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2012-May/msg00216.html again
before posting any further emails to this mailing list.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
authors?
Have Shell maintainers published info on Code changes which may affect
extensions in the past? Putting this into the release notes feels a bit
too late.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list
as this topic won't interest 98% of the mailing list subscribers.
I do understand though that there is no dedicated file-roller mailing
list or IRC channel that you could ask on which is probably why you
brought it up here.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
?
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
as if they wanted to fork for the
sake of forking.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 12:19 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I can't reproduce the problem, and nobody spent
time root-causing it, so I can't do anything.
Any instructions how to provide useful info that could be added to the
report for users running into this?
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net |
Hi Toms,
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 10:31 +0200, Toms wrote:
I would like to thank the GNOME foundation for including hamster in
gnome 5 years ago.
But now we are moving to github:
https://github.com/projecthamster/hamster
Right now it's just the code, but i plan to move over also bugs and
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 10:54 +0200, Lanoxx wrote:
Add wanda the fish to the gnome panel. Then right click - preferences
- set frame rate to 0.2 (original 0.3). Close and remove wanda from the
gnome panel. Now go to Add to panel click on wanda - add
This crashes my whole gnome panel. Can
A few hours ago UI Freeze, Feature Freeze and API/ABI Freeze for 3.5.x
started. Also the String Change Announcement Period started.
The blocker list below is not necessarily complete.
Feedback, updates, help from packagers, developers, maintainers,
contributors, etc. is welcome. Please do speak
Heja,
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 11:47 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Seeing the number of port to gstreamer 1.0 and seeing that's it
feature freeze and gstreamer 1.0 is still not out
I don't see a relation between feature freeze and the gstreamer 1.0
release.
would it make sense
to reconsider
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 12:17 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le 21/08/2012 12:09, Andre Klapper a écrit :
the concerns I
raised during GUADEC still stand: it's getting really late in the cycle,
gstreamer 1.0 is still not out, we still didn't get testing for most of
the components
Hi everybody,
we need YOUR help!
It's time to start preparing the 3.6 release notes to tell our users,
developers and press what's and new in the next GNOME release!
What new features does your application have?
What important bug fixes?
What accessibility improvements do we have?
Which
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Lanoxx wrote:
So if I just wand to build gtk+ 3.5.x with its dependencies. What
moduleset name would I use in my config file?
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive states that the current unstable
series is 3.5.x which will become the 3.6.x stable series.
If
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 12:28 +0200, Piñeiro wrote:
Sorry Andre, I misunderstood you when
we were talking about this at the GUADEC.
I also misunderstood you (and maybe didn't make it clear). Sorry.
I thought that you were
proposing something like accessibility-banshee, accessibility-bla. In
Currently accessibility (a11y) bug reports in random modules/products
can only be found by querying for the accessibility keyword.
Bugzilla does not allow binding an email address to a certain keyword
to automaticall create bugmail whenever a specific keyword is added.
Having accessibility
Kunshan Wang,
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 12:44 +0800, Kunshan Wang wrote:
About IBus and Fcitx
Please stick to the topic. The thread is about the wikipage, not yet
another general discussion about IBus and Fcitx again.
Plus some of your wording is highly unconstructive and unfriendly.
Read
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 21:52 +0800, Kunshan Wang wrote:
However, I would like to make one step further by not making CJK
special. I created another Wiki page https://live.gnome.org/Inputting
This page is currently quite biased since I am a Chinese. I wish
people (not limited to CJK) can
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 18:38 -0400, Marina Zhurakhinskaya wrote:
I'd like to propose a new lock screen as a 3.6 feature.
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Features/ScreenLock has a short
discussion between Lionel and Allan.
Lionel proposes to consider merging the login screen and the lock
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:00 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
One of my goals for 2012 is to increase the number of patches I'm
reviewing myself, and more generally, even further increase the
percentage of patches that go into GNOME that have peer review.
Offtopic, but the obvious first step would
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:54 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think an apology is in order.
That would require criticizing somebody in an inappropriate way first.
I don't see that here.
However I would have appreciated if Federico had elaborated on the
reasons and motivation for his post.
andre
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 15:06 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Em Tue, 2012-04-24 às 15:50 +0200, Andre Klapper escreveu:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:54 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think an apology is in order.
That would require criticizing somebody in an inappropriate way first.
I don't
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:11 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
--8--
From: Maître D'
Subject: Spitting in the soup
The kitchen staff IS NOT welcome to:
* Spit in the soup
--8--
I didn't say you spat in the soup
Correct - nobody stated so far that anybody spat in the soup.
As you already
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 20:45 +0300, Rūdolfs Mazurs wrote:
Does design team use anything like meetbot?
http://meetbot.debian.net/Manual.html
As far as I know still no bots are used for managing and logging any
GNOME IRC meetings. Also see the short discussion here:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 13:46 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 12:59 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We have a design and a plan for finding
and reminding, and Zeitgeist doesn't seem like the right
Hi Seif,
FYI we dropped the module proposals period and replaced it by a proposal
period for systemwide features. See
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2012-March/msg5.html
for the GNOME 3.5 call.
So the question would turn into Which (Zeitgeist-based) features could
A draft for the GNOME 3.5 schedule is available at
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive#Schedule
Comments are welcome; Silence means compliance.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
___
desktop-devel-list
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:04 +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
We do you push it so hard to avoid the term browser? Browser has
been used by non-tech people for a couple of years now.
Because most people do not know what a browser is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4MwTvtyrUQ
I normally prefer to
GNOME 3.4.0 will be released in one week.
Later today is HARD CODE FREEZE (but you can always ask the release-team
for exceptions).
This is a list of potential release blockers plus some should-fix
tickets.
This list is not necessarily complete. Feedback, updates, help from
packagers,
If your module is listed below, please go to
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=patchreport.htmlpatch-status=accepted-commit_now
and either
* get those patches in before Monday's HARDCODE FREEZE
(if the patch still applies),
* or update the patch status accordingly.
Please keep UI Freeze
GNOME 3.4.0 will be released in two weeks.
This is a list of potential release blockers plus some should-fix
tickets according to yesterday's release team meeting.
This list is not necessarily complete. Feedback, updates, help from
packagers, developers, maintainers, contributors, etc. is
[Please edit/strip the CC list if answering is needed!]
Hi everybody,
time to start preparing the GNOME 3.4 release notes to tell users,
developers and press what's new and great in GNOME!
This means: We need YOUR help as you know best!
Please take two minutes:
* What new features does your
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:44 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
After having to send in another code freeze break request e-mail, I
realised that the process is problematic. Apart from the release team
and the patch sender, nobody else knows about the freeze break request,
or about the status of the
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 14:45 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
*** SCHEDULE PROPOSAL: ***
The release-team decided to propose the following:
* drop UI Change Announcement Period,
* merge String Change Announcement Period, API/ABI Freeze,
Feature
Freeze, and UI Freeze
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 16:29 -0500, Elliott Chapin wrote:
To make this easier I suggest an addition to the file properties -
open with tab: a general file chooser dialogue - the result to be
added automatically to the general application list.
Feel free to file an enhancement request in
Ladies and Gentlemen,
a quick look at some basic GNOME Bugzilla activity in 2011.
Created by using
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.htmldays=365products=0reporters=15hunters=15patchers=15reviewers=15
Overall statistics:
2011 2010 2009
Picking this up again, finally. Sorry that it took so long.
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 13:21 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
The main problem is developer awareness. Developers don't know
exactly what constitutes a change that the documentation team
cares about. And it's sometimes hard to keep of which
[Please edit the recipients list if your answer is specific to your
mailing list to avoid unneeded cross-posting.]
The second and last bunch of Google Code-In tasks will be published on
December 16th. Afterwards no tasks can be added anymore, so if you have
an idea take a look at
Hi Andika,
[For future responses, please strip the long CC list.]
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 08:56 +0700, Andika Triwidada wrote:
After you have converted all estimated time from days to hours, it
seems that every task,
even the simplest one, need much more time than initially. For
instance,
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 16:45 -0400, komputes wrote:
A few more nautilus features.
Please write to the nautilus mailing list instead.
This is no content for desktop-devel-list, plus wishlists are mostly
uninteresting if you don't offer manpower to work on it.
Thanks,
andre
--
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 08:32 -0500, Leonel Florin Selles wrote:
Hi, I will like to know hot to create a o simulate a desklet wiht
gtk-sharp o moonlight.
And how I prevent that the objects within a opacity windows don't get the
windows opacity, to give the impression that there are floating on
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 15:23 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
What should we do with the old gnome-utils bugzilla component? We should
probably close it for new bugs (possibly adding a bunch of links to the
new modules as well?).
I have closed the Bugzilla product gnome-utils for bug entry, and
[CC'ing release-team and gnome-i18n@.]
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 13:21 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
In the past, we've had three points in the schedule to help:
the UI change announcement period, the feature freeze, and the
UI freeze. Feature freeze is gone from the 3.3 schedule, which
confused
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
- Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
about this somewhere I saw recently)
Also see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660720
- Why show the wacom graphics tablet configuration page in the
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:51 +0200, Syco wrote:
Someone could insert this procedure in the official guide, it's not so
clear how to procede.
Please file a bug report in bugzilla.gnome.org (so this will not be
forgotten) and link to your email to this mailing list for reference.
Thanks,
andre
--
A draft for the GNOME 3.3 schedule is available at
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree#Schedule
Comments are welcome; Silence means compliance.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.2
Total number: 19 bugs.
Comments (e.g. important issues that are missing in
If your module is in the list below, please check
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=patchreport.htmlpatch-status=accepted-commit_now
and either get those patches in if they still apply or update their
status. The Bugzilla page also states how old the patch is.
Please keep UI and String Freeze
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 20:46 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
it's time to start preparing the 3.2 release notes to tell our users,
developers and press what's hot and new in the next GNOME release!
This means: We need YOUR help!
Please take two minutes and add your news to
https
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:26 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
(FindingAndReminding is even marked obsolete!
For clarification: This just refers to its status for 3.2, it does not
necessarily refer to future GNOME releases.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.2
Total number: 15 bugs.
Comments (e.g. important issues that are missing in
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 17:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
gnome-control-center: Network: custom connections don't show up in the
list
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645094
There is an old patch by hadess available.
There isn't.
Oops, true.
Sorry, I think that refered to
Hi everybody,
it's time to start preparing the 3.2 release notes to tell our users,
developers and press what's hot and new in the next GNOME release!
This means: We need YOUR help!
What new features does your application have?
What important bug fixes?
What accessibility improvements do we
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 13:23 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi everyone,
David Zeuthen pointed out that gudev in jhbuild (3.2 modulesets) is
several years old (from 08-Dec-2004)
For the records,
http://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/tree/modulesets/gnome-suites-core-deps-3.2.modules
says
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 16:02 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
wrote:
The Committee for Internet Discussions and Heated Arguments (TCFIDAH)
would like to announce
Not helpful for the discussion. Or in other words: Be respectful and
considerate, taken from
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 13:46 +0800, mamingcheng63538 wrote:
I'm now using the gnome3 on fedora 15 ,now a question make me nearly
crazy,could you tell me how to switch alt to win ?
Please ask in a user / support forum of your distribution (for example
http://www.fedoraforum.org/ ), as
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 14:17 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On 1 July 2011 13:56, Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com wrote:
If you intend this to be part of 3.1.3, merging it before the weekend
would be nice. That will give us a few more days to deal with possible
fallout and find a volunteer to roll
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 10:18 -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
This thread is making it sound like the release team is OK with
criteria like whichever platforms systemd doesn't run on, which
would certainly seem to put Ubuntu next in line for the axe.
Okay, you wrote sound like, but where exactly was
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 15:16 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
For a start, you're a member of the release team, so people could take
this as official GNOME policy.
I consider persons individuals, plus wrt release-team I think we
normally tag official positions either by we (release-team) or on
behalf
Please avoid cross-posting. This does not look like content for
desktop-devel@ - please remove that address for potential responses.
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 10:13 -0700, bsquared wrote:
What is the correct moduleset to use to build Gnome 3.0?
gnome-suites-core.
gnome-suites-core-deps are the
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 18:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was not going to propose this project because I am sick of this sort
of unprofessional response, especially from leaders in the community.
So, you
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 20:02 +0300, pec...@gmail.com wrote:
I read in changelogs that in 2.91.4 Flash plugin was blacklisted in
Epiphany. Is there any info was it unlisted? Or blocking is still in
place? I mention this because Flash doesn't work in Fedora 15 beta
using Epiphany.
Fixed already:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 23:41 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno ven, 22/04/2011 alle 19.51 +0200, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
No feedback, hence the 3.2 schedule is hereby finalized.
Could someone update www.gnome.org/start/unstable/schedule.ics ?
Should be in place now.
Sorry that it took
Now that the 3.0 dust has settled, a draft for the GNOME 3.1 schedule is
now available at
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne#Schedule
Comments are welcome; Silence means compliance.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 12:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Regarding gnome-tweak-tool, is it able to enable settings system-wide?
Or, is that feature even planned for the future?
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeTweakTool
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper |
NB: The release-team met yesterday and reviewed the blocker reports by
splitting them into must-fix, should-fix and nice-to-have
categories.
Below the Blockers (mustfix) list you will find the list of Important
issues (shouldfix) that *should* also get fixed for 3.0, but they will
not block the
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.0
Total number: 83 bugs (81 last week).
atk: atk is missing annotations needed
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.0
Total number: 81 bugs (86 last week).
atk: atk is missing annotations
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.0
Total number: 86 bugs (100 last week).
at-spi: Injecting GTK_PATH in the
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 08:01 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
- vino
- vinagre
http://www.bani.com.br/lang/en/2010/12/looking-for-new-maintainers/
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 19:19 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Is there a place where IRC logs of discussions from the various
channels can be found?
I am not aware of any automated GimpNet IRC channel logging and
publishing.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 22:27 +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
if you think the UI in my mockup is to difficult
[...]
Repeating: Wrong mailing list.
Please stop posting on this thread.
Thank you,
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.0
Total number: 100 bugs (106 last week).
atk: atk is missing annotations
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.0
[Compared to the last one I removed the 3.0 target for python
introspection,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 18:19 +0100, Juanjo Marin wrote:
AFAIK, one of the cornerstone components of GNOME 3 is GObject
Introspection. I'd like to know which libraries are supposed to
support GObject Introspection.
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AddGObjectIntrospectionSupport has a
list, not
101 - 200 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
