Jaap Haitsma wrote:
]
Ok so how can we add them in the icon naming spec ? Who should I contact ?
I think you should contact Rodney Dawes dobey at novell dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
Martin Soto wrote:
An additional point that nobody has mentioned so far is security. Most
(if not all) plugin implementations already available for Gnome programs
seem to allow for installing plugins in some user-owned directory. This
means that by gaining access to the user's home directory, an
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Sex, 2007-05-18 às 12:54 +0200, Martin Soto escreveu:
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:28 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote:
Martin Soto wrote:
An additional point that nobody has mentioned so far is security. Most
(if not all) plugin implementations already
Shaun McCance wrote:
It's not uncommon for software producers to have terminology
guidelines that don't quite follow dictionary definitions.
In the software world, we often use metaphors and re-use
words with a sufficiently similar real-world meaning.
For plug-in, the OED says:
*3.*
My personal reaction is that it would be more useful to have a GNOME
distribution (such as something jhbuild or garnome derived) which can
act as a testbed of next-generation technologies - and where people can
happily make different modules work together, or swap out the panel for
something
Being able to replace Mugshot-as-desktop-server is neither here nor
there. Sure, from the Freedom perspective we don't want to rely on a
particular server [1], but that's not what's going to really affect the
desktop experience.
What's important from the user experience is not having to rely
Richard Hughes wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 17:13 +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote:
Personally I am not able anymore to handle my bugmail anymore and even
useful bugreports get lost in the noise.
Tell me about it. gnome-power-manager 2.18.0 had a bug where it would
segfault when you locked
Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 16:57 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 02 mars 2007 à 14:24 +0800, Neo Liu a écrit :
gurus,
how can I get a library version in code? is there a general way? and if
not, is there a way to get atk/at-spi library version?
Yair Hershkovitz wrote:
2) I think we should add an rtl keyword to bugzilla, for tracking RTL
issues.
This is exactly the sort of meta- thing that keywords were designed for.
In principal, I'm in favour.
Do you want to open a bug against bugzilla.gnome.org asking for the
keyword to be
Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 16:26 +, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Joe Shaw wrote:
[snipped my concerns about Tracker]
all these also apply to EDS too yet no one complains?
Some of them apply. EDS isn't a general data store; it has APIs and
backends that are very specific to
Diego Escalante wrote:
And in case you have errors about locales, try:
alias svn=LANG=C svn
in your .bashrc, but I have heard that the problems with locales are gone now.
As of svn 1.3.2, there are locale errors.
I was ignoring them, I've just aliased ;-)
--
Andrewq
Danilo Šegan wrote:
You guys seem to be engaging in the SVN vs. GIT (or any other RCS)
again. I thought that this discussion was over, and I am not getting
into it now ;)
Just as a point of information - the last time this discussion was had,
there was a *lot* of support for a *lot* of
These are standard conventions for digital clocks.
This is a development list that you've posted to. Please address any
other questions about the GNOME desktop to the user list,
gnome-list@gnome.org, or the web forums at
http://gnomesupport.org/forums/. Thanks!
heromyth wrote:
Now it was
Marco Barisione wrote:
Il giorno lun, 18/12/2006 alle 13.02 +0100, Danilo Šegan ha scritto:
Isn't this provided by LANGUAGE environment variable on GNU systems?
Do you have some specs on how LANGUAGE is supposed to work?
Jonathan Blandford wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
menu is about 20 entry when you install some additionnal softwares.
Gnome is the only desktop which keep using this outdated
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 14:25 -0500, Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
- Develop a simple tool for control-center to adjust above
settings.
Is this strictly necessary? Or would it be better to have it default
to g_getlocale()?
I think it would be
Brian Cameron wrote:
Let's say some program generates a log file, and because this log file
is useful for debugging the maintainer specifies that the logfile should
be added to the bug report when it is created. This sounds good, but
what if there is some way that sensitive or private data
Shaun McCance wrote:
I think most (non-hacker) users will look at a stack trace and not
even bother trying to figure out where their personal information
might be inside it. Maybe adding a find dialog/bar would make them
a bit more likely to do so (Does it say hotsexychicks.com in here
Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I'm posting this here to encourage you to read my presentation at
http://www.k-d-w.org/clipboard/NewStuffManager/ and to find out what you
are expecting from such an application.
Hi Sebastian,
I missed Nigel's original e-mail, and on reading it now, I think an
Chipzz wrote:
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Why can't gtk depend on dbus? How do those reasons not apply to libgnome?
I don't know, I'm asking. But there's no reason to just make an
assumption up front that gtk can't depend on dbus, or that gnome should.
Because
Andrew Sobala wrote:
Chipzz wrote:
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Why can't gtk depend on dbus? How do those reasons not apply to libgnome?
I don't know, I'm asking. But there's no reason to just make an
assumption up front that gtk can't depend on dbus
Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 16:03 -0400, Bryan Clark wrote:
FWIW I think this project is awesome and should be 'blessed' into GNOME,
it's made a large improvement to power issues the desktop has had for a
while now. I'd recommend dropping the batstat applet in favor of this,
Alan Horkan wrote:
I put serious thought into the fact that Gnome 3.0 would be useful way to
highlight all the progress that has been made. A major version number
change is also of some marketing value.
Look at the desktop. It's got incredibly amazing since the times of
GNOME 2.2, but
Dan Winship wrote:
Andrew Sobala wrote:
And it can *all* be done *now.* That's the point. It's big. It's hard.
It's a lot of work. But there's nothing to stop any of these ideas being
implemented. And when we have the code to make this all work, we can
build something new: the next
I've been using Tomboy for the last few days and it seriously rocks. +1 ;-)
I have one question: Google tells me it should integrate with Beagle,
but Beagle searches never return any Tomboy-related results. Should this
Just Work?
--
Andrew
___
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Hello,
I work for an OEM that eagerly wants to sell Linux computers.
Hi,
I am glad to learn that you want to support Linux on the PCs that you sell.
I've spent all afternoon trying to figure out how I, as an OEM, can
configure Gnome before giving it to a user. I just
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 22:08 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote:
Corey Burger wrote:
On 4/9/06, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/9/06, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's worth pointing out that gnome-power-manager is very much
Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
Is that a polite way of saying that it is a policy that 'make uninstall'
should work in order for an app to be hosted by f.g.o?
That sort of policy would be fairly unenforcable. The point of
ftp.gnome.org is to distribute components of the GNOME suite -
Jaap Haitsma wrote:
Richard,
As far as I understand the code of GPM splitting up GPM in a daemon
and a notication area icon/applet would not be so hard.
They are pretty independent from each other.
The daemon just has to watch batteries, laptop lid, hardware keys and
take appropriate
Corey Burger wrote:
On 4/9/06, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/9/06, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's worth pointing out that gnome-power-manager is very much a notifier
rather than an interactive applet. If your power cable falls out, it
pops up a message saying
Elijah Newren wrote:
On 4/9/06, Scott J. Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I the only one who mouses over the applet to see how much more time
until the battery is fully charged?
Definitely not; I rely on this frequently. I'd be heavily annoyed if
the applet wasn't showing (and no
Sergej Kotliar wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 21:15 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 24 mars 2006 à 16:20 +0300, Nickolay V. Shmyrev a écrit :
While looking on discussion of removed screensaver button and work
work on GNOME docs translation, one interesting idea came to my
Michael Avila wrote:
Thank you so much for your help. This is my 2nd or 3rd attempt at Linux. So
far it is going much better than the previous attempts.
I was trying to install it using
yum install gnome
so I guess I was a little off course! LOL But you got me going. The docs on
CentOS give
Sean D'Epagnier wrote:
Isn't it true that scons requires you download and install it as an
extra program to use it? Many users may not have scons and may not
want to install it, but do want to install gnome (by compiling from
source code).
This is identical to the situation for autotools.
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:15 -0300, James Henstridge wrote:
That would get mail related to non gnome-common related bugs too though,
right?
Yeah. For future reference, if you want to do it in a bodgy way, you can
filter by keeping X-Bugzilla-Reason:.*WatchAssigned then throwing away
On Jul 22 2005, Murray Cumming wrote:
I believe he meant 2.4 (the filechooser release).
(yes)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:49 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
But there is no reason to tarnish Gnome's reputation because some people
feel that Gtk 2.8 is too cool to wait. Shipping a slower, more fragile
version of Gnome and which in addition will not benefit for the most
part on any of the new
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 17:20 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
There could or could not be significant issues in 2.7. The point is its
not certain and it introduces significant *risk* to the schedule. We
went through the same thing with 2.6 and it seems we learned nothing,
see your own original view:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:22 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
We're not lacking people doing tinderboxing.[1] The thing we're really
missing (which has always been more important than tinderboxing, IMHO)
is for someone to build daily rpms and debs for popular distributions,
so that 'average' users can
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:06 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Yesterday at 21:54, Andrew Sobala wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 20:42 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2005-07-13 at 16:27, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Level 2 - the app is actually written with GTK+.
Why does this matter
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 12:10 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
It has not been tested it was too soon to test. Why are people so
afraid of gtk+ 2.7 without even trying it? It really is quite stable
now.
I think it's because in these enlightened times, people use the GNOME
stack that
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:09 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
So, yeah, I'm pretty strongly against this, though I'm open to persuasion.
aolMe too/aol, for all the reasons Luis listed. I remember our r-t
discussions basically concluded that we'd made a mistake depending on
GTK+ for 2.6. 2.6 had stability
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 21:10 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 18:35:43 +0200, Markus Bertheau wrote:
Can the responsible person create [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing
list discussion about GNOME 2 can happen there then.
I'd suggest gnome-bluesky-list, that way all the free thinking
43 matches
Mail list logo
