Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 15:43 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit : I don't think the advent of sound cards that do this kind of switching in software should hold as back and require us to export every single crazy volume control to the user. Still, this is not a reason to break things on

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 17:33 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit : Isn't the fact that we plan to include both volume controls in GNOME transition phase enough? Those distros who like PA adopt the new one, the ones who don't continue to use the old one. Distros who are unable to decide have

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 11 janvier 2009 à 01:19 +, Luis Medinas a écrit : - Nautilus extension (based on the current ncb), there are some applications that put the files on burn:/// with this extension Brasero replaces ncb and Burn the media. Very nice! Do you have a screenshot? - Split Brasero into

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 11 janvier 2009 à 12:21 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit : Please also note that on current trunk the Audio capplet from gnome-control-center and the Volume Control applet from gnome-applets was replaced in favour of new gnome-volume-control and gnome-volume-control-applet[1] in

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 11 janvier 2009 à 10:37 -0500, William Jon McCann a écrit : 2009/1/11 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org: So, there is no more GStreamer mixer? It is not possible to use any other backend than PulseAudio? It looks like an important regression to me. It is interesting to me how

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 11 janvier 2009 à 16:51 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit : A. With pulseaudio * gnome-volume-control (NEW, not the previous one) from gnome-media * gnome-volume-control-applet from gnome-media (new, a notification icon,

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 06 janvier 2009 à 13:10 +1100, Andrew Cowie a écrit : Regardless, GNOME is not switching to anything. If GNOME infrastructure is going to offer Git hosting, that's lovely for people who chose to use Git as their version control system. {shrug} fine. If GNOME infrastructure

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 05 janvier 2009 à 09:51 -0500, Dan Winship a écrit : It seems pretty clear that the git-over-bzr solution doesn't make the git users any happier than git-over-svn does, so let's not pretend that it's any different from doing just bzr. So, given that we seem to have sysadmin resources

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 05 janvier 2009 à 00:04 +0100, Johannes Schmid a écrit : I totally agree here! This is simply a problem of QA. If someone writes a system that can serve all possible (D)VCS clients that's fine but this won't happen tommorow No, it already happened and it is called Subversion. This is

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 15:40 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo a écrit : On a side note here, I recalled being against dropping ChangeLogs in projects in favour of commit messages. But now I love it and I realize that my main problem was that with SVN I *needed* the ChangeLog since that was

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 23:44 +, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : I'd agree if you could not properly see a project's commit history on a web interface, like with viewvc for svn, but since you can: http://git.clutter-project.org/cgit.cgi?url=clutter/log/ your point is moot. Sorry,

Re: Reporting crashes [was: Reduced Bugzilla functionality]

2008-12-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 05 décembre 2008 à 11:10 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit : I’m not really convinced by the minidump approach, especially because of the confidentiality implications. Furthermore the current code still has non-free components and is not distributable. Non-free? By Debian

Re: External dependencies, DeviceKit-power and GNOME Power Manager

2008-11-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 25 novembre 2008 à 15:25 +, Richard Hughes a écrit : Right, but I need more than feedback from gentoo, FreeBSD and Solaris for these project, we need _code_. The days of easily being able to run a desktop GNOME instance without PackageKit, ConsoleKit, PolicyKit or DeviceKit are

Re: External dependencies, DeviceKit-power and GNOME Power Manager

2008-11-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 25 novembre 2008 à 13:39 -0500, David Zeuthen a écrit : The kernel is definitely part of this and, FWIW, we (the ConsoleKit developers) are working with the Linux kernel developers and security people to get this right (initially the session id wasn't readable to user space etc.). I

Re: FUD from PackageKit, Was: External dependencies, DeviceKit-power and GNOME Power Manager

2008-11-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 25 novembre 2008 à 20:42 +0100, Matteo Settenvini a écrit : An idea, by the way: as of now, Ubuntu during an update pops-up sparingly a window asking what to do with a modified configuration file: if keeping the original version of the maintainer, the modified one, or what else. Yes,

Re: External dependencies, DeviceKit-power and GNOME Power Manager

2008-11-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 24 novembre 2008 à 18:25 +, Richard Hughes a écrit : DeviceKit-power is a new mechanism daemon that moves the battery profiling and statistics interface system-wide, and also does the history recording once per system, rather than once per session. It also moves to an interface

Re: New module proposal for GNOME 2.26: evolution-mapi

2008-11-21 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 21 novembre 2008 à 00:06 +0530, Suman Manjunath a écrit : On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Ross for the starter. This connector can work against Exchange 5.5 onwards till Exchange 2007. The old one works only with Exchange 2000

Re: gnome-desktop on omap3

2008-11-21 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 21 novembre 2008 à 14:29 +0530, Amit Pundir a écrit : Now my concern is how to start the GUI. What and where to configure to kickstart gnome on bootup? Can anyone please tell me or give me some pointers on how to bring my X11-Gnome environment up, i.e which service to start or

Re: New module proposal for GNOME 2.26: evolution-mapi

2008-11-21 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 21 novembre 2008 à 16:43 +0530, Johnny Jacob a écrit : However there are some setups where MAPI is not available at all, and even Outlook clients use the HTTP interface. It would be nice if both connectors could be merged – and the webdav interface updated for Exchange 2007 –

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 05 novembre 2008 à 14:01 +, Alberto Ruiz a écrit : That shouldn't be needed, udev should set proper permissions on the device already. Well, some admins don't want users to write CDs on multiuser environments. So yes, it's definitively needed. The case where it is needed

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 05 novembre 2008 à 13:41 +, Luis Medinas a écrit : Again... is any regression provide a standalone application that makes users do whatever they want when they want to burn a cd/dvd ? Yes, this is a regression. NCB made the right choice to consider CD burning as a service

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 05 novembre 2008 à 13:51 +, Alberto Ruiz a écrit : Does brasero has any sort of PolicyKit integration to handle the lack of write permission on the device (or cdrecord lack of setuid)? That shouldn’t be needed, udev should set proper permissions on the device already. Cheers,

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 05 novembre 2008 à 16:55 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit : So we have two different issues. ** Issue #1 ** We want a standard, well behaving, full featured GNOME framework for burning. Solutions: * add missing features in

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 21:19 +, Luis Medinas a écrit : On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:21 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Yes. There are two separate things here: a real burning backend (which currently is cdrtools/cdrkit and in the end should probably be libburn) and a base UI. NCB

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 03 novembre 2008 à 09:34 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann a écrit : I agree that more ambitious users need more powerful tools than NCB or Serpentine. So what about this random idea: Let's use PackageKit to add some Install Brasero button to the NCB window? I’d prefer to see the missing

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 01 novembre 2008 à 19:27 +0100, Philippe Rouquier a écrit : We'd be interested in having brasero integrated into the GNOME desktop. -1 for me. Brasero has a way too complex UI compared to n-c-b, with doubtful improvement in terms of features. AFAICT the only thing it has that ncb

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 23:17 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : Also note that whatever solution is chosen, this needs to be possible: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529852 Interesting. AFAIK lighttpd can use xattrs to set the MIME type, but not sniff them.

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 18:22 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit : Yeah, I have the same problem with Glom's dependency on PostgreSQL. Debian/Ubuntu users get an unused PostgreSQL instance even when Glom isn't running, just because its Debian policy to run any services that are installed, with

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide Apache packages configured to run at startup, so it is not just a matter of binary size. What do distributors think? I think we could split the web server

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 16:41 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : I doubt our server guys will get overly happy over the idea of disabling a typical server daemon just so you can integrate it with GNOME. I don't really think I want the server team to hate the GNOME team any more. Why is

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 17:58 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit : SQLLite can't do what PostgreSQL can do, which is why PostgresSQL exists. For instance: - Multi-user and the relevant locking. - Access control. - Network access. As these are not things necessary for a UI generator, I

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 20:58 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : I don't think that this kind of FUD about Apache is very constructive. Just because lighttpd has a light in its name it doesn't mean that Apache is a slow huge beast. That is nonsense. And just because Apache is famous

Re: libunique external dependency for 2.25?

2008-10-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 23:23 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : another issue is that libunique is pretty much a testing ground for API and requirements and while the basic functionality is obviously already implemented I still receive requests[2] that make sense to add *before* putting the

Re: libunique external dependency for 2.25?

2008-10-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 14:29 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : The alternative is to ship a constantly api/abi changing library, which means you'll either have to constantly patch apps to work with the version you ship or you end up shipping multiple versions of the library. Which brings

Re: Prompting for passwords on the desktop?

2008-09-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008 à 11:54 +0200, Steve Frécinaux a écrit : 2008/9/18 Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]: One way to avoid annoying the user is to establish a line like a password prompt should only pop up immediately after a user action. This way it appears only while you

Re: Prompting for passwords on the desktop?

2008-09-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008 à 16:02 +0200, Dave Neary a écrit : I really think the good criterion is not “has focus” but some “action triggered by the user less than 1 second ago”. That seems like it'll be overly complicating any code that gets written to handle this. I didn’t mean to

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 20 septembre 2008 à 12:17 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : read this bit above again... This is not true. See #307963. From the gtk 2.12 documentation for GtkAdjustment: The page size of the adjustment. Note that the page-size is irrelevant and should be set to zero if the

Re: Prompting for passwords on the desktop?

2008-09-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008 à 18:46 +, Stef a écrit : Some people want it to act like gksudo. That is, make a password prompt desktop modal, no other windows are accessible, everything grayed out. Use case/complaint: I was giving a presentation in front of thousands of people. I did X

Re: Debian-specific patches for the GNOME packages

2008-09-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 12:54 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : So in short, what you might be looking for is here: http://patch-tracking.debian.net/email/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Who do we contact to know what the patches are for? The easiest way to reach a maintainer is probably the [EMAIL

Re: Debian-specific patches for the GNOME packages

2008-09-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 09:01 -0400, Luis Villa a écrit : Is anybody regularly reviewing/triaging those? I assume no, right? 'twould be a great project for somebody. We are trying to forward all those that are relevant for upstream in bugzilla, but given this is a manual process, we often

Re: desktop background notes

2008-08-29 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 16:16 +0100, Joe Bloggs a écrit : Hi, can anyone tell me if they know of an application that easily allows me to save written notes on the desktop background (preferably overlayed on top of the background image)? I don't want a seperate application window, I want to

Re: Absolute paths to applications in .desktop files

2008-07-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008 à 01:47 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : This is more complex than that. If I copy a launcher from the applications menu to my panel or desktop and then run my session in jhbuild, I might want to use the jhbuilt application instead of the system application.

Absolute paths to applications in .desktop files

2008-07-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, the topic was raised on debian-devel and I think we should make sure that we are not missing anything before someone starts a crusade about it, so I prefer asking here. Currently, none of the .desktop files shipped in GNOME modules specify an absolute path for the executable. However this is

Re: Using vala in GNOME

2008-07-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 01 juillet 2008 à 10:30 +1200, Callum McKenzie a écrit : As an aside: ultimately it will be necessary to move it from a hacking dependency to a build dependency. Novice developers work from tarballs, not SVN and you will get patches against your generated code appearing in bugzilla.

Re: Using vala in GNOME

2008-07-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 01 juillet 2008 à 10:49 +0200, Jürg Billeter a écrit : The tarball should also contain the .vala source files This sounds OK, we can manage them like the autotools files with quilt. and the build system should rebuild the C code when the .vala files have changed, similar to how

Re: gnome-panel logout menu

2008-05-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 12 mai 2008 à 19:31 +0200, Wouter Bolsterlee a écrit : Debian includes a gnome-panel-logout binary to provide the logout dialog as a standalone program. It makes much sense to get this upstream. As Simon explained, this will no longer be necessary in 2.24 so the patch will disappear.

Unifying the logout dialog, session management thoughts

2008-01-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, since the logout/shutdown dialog boxes have been in gnome-panel, there is a double inconsistency across the desktop: * unsynchronized code duplication for GDM integration, and the same could arise for g-p-m communication code; * UI inconsistency between the default logout

Re: build systems

2007-11-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 13:45 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen a écrit : In my ideal world a build system would be completely decoupled from the implementation - for example like Ant XML with the Java-isms converted to generic instructions. Please, not until you can express the equivalent

Re: Agnubus?

2007-11-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 02 novembre 2007 à 11:04 -0400, Hubert Figuiere a écrit : OOo is Gtk based for several years. This is not true. OOo only uses Gtk themes, not Gtk widgets. Big difference. Like the difference between firefox and epiphany. What difference does it make to the users? It

Re: Will symlinking fix trash bugs? (Was Re: Please can we get a consistent desktop neutral trash behaviour.)

2007-10-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Le mercredi 17 octobre 2007 à 14:23 +0200, Christian Kirbach a écrit : (a) maintain compability with old apps (b) create a freedesktop.org compatible trashing system at the same time (c) not require any changes to nautilus or gnome-vfs (nor gvfs) Then again distros could do this with

Re: Pulseaudio

2007-10-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Le mardi 16 octobre 2007 à 22:14 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : Gustavo brought up the issue that PA hogs the sound device. Sure we do. The idea is having everything go through PA, so that we can treat everything the same. However, since there are some APIs that are It makes

Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.22

2007-09-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 27 septembre 2007 à 00:48 +0200, Sven Herzberg a écrit : Next question: consistency with the platform The GNOME platform uses LGPL as the license of choice to provide ISVs with a powerful stack that anyone can use - even to build proprietary software. You say, you took code from

Re: nxlaunch: A new GTK NX client

2007-09-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 17 septembre 2007 à 16:26 +0100, Seb James a écrit : Heads up for those interested in remote desktop connections: I just committed a GTK NX client called nxlaunch to the freenx svn repository at berlios: This sounds quite interesting, but I would have loved to see this work

Re: Distributed SCM in Gnome (Was: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?))

2007-09-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
worse than a broken tool is using another tool to unbreak it. SVK is not a tool to unbreak Subversion, it's just another implementation. It's easier to do something wrong than right. And it's easier to use a simple tool than a sophisticated one. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette

Re: Distributed SCM in Gnome (Was: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?))

2007-09-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
are already available to those who love git thanks to git-svn. It strikes me that we would actually lose svn's killer feature (simplicity) if the whole repository is migrated to git. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: dropping bug-buddy reports for old version of gnome automatically

2007-04-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 14:20 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote: As far as I am concerned I'd like to drop any reports from 2.16 and below, but I see how that may be a little to aggressive. What about dropping reports from 2.14

Re: dropping bug-buddy reports for old version of gnome automatically

2007-04-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 16:19 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : Oh, and a warning: without having some system in place to detect duplicates automatically, you will be overwhelmed. Definitely. This, and the fact such reports are mostly useless without debugging symbols available. I have some

Re: how to get a gnome library version with code?

2007-03-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 02 mars 2007 à 14:24 +0800, Neo Liu a écrit : gurus, how can I get a library version in code? is there a general way? and if not, is there a way to get atk/at-spi library version? There is no generic way to do this, but a number of libraries provide interfaces to their version.

Re: how to get a gnome library version with code?

2007-03-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 03 mars 2007 à 14:11 -0300, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes a écrit : On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 16:57 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 02 mars 2007 à 14:24 +0800, Neo Liu a écrit : gurus, how can I get a library version in code? is there a general way

Re: Window subtitles

2007-02-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 17 février 2007 à 00:07 +0100, Étienne Bersac a écrit : Hi, I really like the Tango mockup. Especially the compact one. Ditto. Is this something that can be done given how GTK+ and metacity are currently architectured? To make this work we have to end the distinction between the

Re: Software installation using gnome

2007-01-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 03 janvier 2007 à 11:02 +, Chris Vaughan a écrit : What I am trying to do is create an installer for a software tool I have been developing. I would like something that sounds relatively simple to happen. On Linux distributions, software is installed using packages, not

Re: Replacing control center menus

2006-12-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
is quite an acceptable number. -- Josselin Mouette/\./\ Do you have any more insane proposals for me? signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list

Re: [Gnome-OCR] Integration of Tesseract-OCR...

2006-12-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 01 décembre 2006 à 17:46 +0100, Étienne Bersac a écrit : Hi, 1) Tesseract-OCR software has been released under Apache License 2.0 I guess it will fit well with LGPL. But not with e.g. writing an abiword plugin. -- Josselin Mouette/\./\ Do you have any more

Re: proposed architecture evolutions for GConf

2006-11-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
something like this automatically setup, but I'm afraid it would be getting, although much interesting, far beyond the scope of this discussion. Josselin Mouette wrote: I think a good short-term change is to revert to global locking by default. There is a way to turn on global locking

proposed architecture evolutions for GConf

2006-11-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
monitoring. Comments anyone? -- Josselin Mouette/\./\ Do you have any more insane proposals for me? signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list

Re: proposed architecture evolutions for GConf

2006-11-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
to connect to a Gconfd server via tcp to a remote socket:port. You are describing what CORBA already brings with the current implementation, provided that global locking is enabled. -- Josselin Mouette/\./\ Do you have any more insane proposals for me? signature.asc

Re: Introducing NewStuffManager

2006-10-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
releases, using extensions. As Epiphany extensions are tightly dependent on the Epiphany version, I don't think it would be very useful. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux

Re: fam vs. gamin

2006-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
code as gnome-vfs... Which version? The latest gamin version is still showing this bug. Well, it was until we switched gnome-menus to gnome-vfs and deprecate gamin entirely. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL

Re: fam vs. gamin

2006-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 02 octobre 2006 à 12:17 +0200, Alexander Larsson a écrit : On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 11:24 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: But it works by polling, while fam queries the remote fam server which is notified by dnotify. Are you actually aware of any systems that have set up fam

Re: fam vs. gamin

2006-09-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
about... a working desktop? Gamin is responsible for bugs in gnome-menus where the menu becomes empty. This doesn't happen when using gnome-vfs. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux

Re: Clarius

2006-09-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
compatibility symlinks in gnome-themes 2.16 to avoid a mess for people upgrading. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie

Re: Common knowledge in jhbuild for funny modules

2006-08-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
to depend on at the beginning of a release; and require specific proposals to allow dependencies on newer tarball versions if issues come up. Thoughts? Comments? I would be very interesting in hearing the opinions of people like Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] who build new releases

Re: gnome-themes and licensing

2006-04-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 26 avril 2006 à 21:00 +0100, Thomas Wood a écrit : Josselin Mouette wrote: Le samedi 15 avril 2006 à 13:16 +0100, Thomas Wood a écrit : Personally, I think it's understandable that artists may choose not to distribute their work under the (L)GPL, which is primarily a license

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
values. The purpose is for CDD to overwrite Debian defaults, and for site-specific packages to overwrite all other defaults. I also recommend that you read the manual of dh_gconf if you plan to ship such changes in Debian packages. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette

Re: New schemas aren't picked up by running gconfd-2 [was Re: rawhide report: 20060125 changes]

2006-01-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
-installation scripts? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel

Re: New schemas aren't picked up by running gconfd-2 [was Re: rawhide report: 20060125 changes]

2006-01-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
gconftool normally does. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel

Re: New schemas aren't picked up by running gconfd-2 [was Re: rawhide report: 20060125 changes]

2006-01-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
for it. killall as root kills all processes on the system on solaris, I think. So this might not be a perfect patch for upstream. :) It does the same on Linux. The purpose is to signal all running gconfd-2 processes in user sessions. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL

Re: New schemas aren't picked up by running gconfd-2 [was Re: rawhide report: 20060125 changes]

2006-01-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
. Sadly, gnome-VFS is out of question because it depends on GConf itself. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Re: GFDL/GPL problems

2006-01-21 Thread Josselin Mouette
. True. While the GPL is suitable for distributing a documentation on CD, it is annoying for distribution on paper. That's why dual-licensing a documentation with e.g. the GFDL or the OPL isn't a bad idea. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: GConf --makefile-uninstall-rule is incompatible with packaging systems

2006-01-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
be though. Hopefully less nasty. With dpkg, this doesn't exist. The schemas are all unregistered in the prerm script, which is run before the upgrade. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: GDFL - why is it bad? Debian could do better! (was: Re: Debian and the GFDL problem)

2006-01-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
. Please bring this on another place or in private mail. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de

Re: GDFL - why is it bad? Debian could do better! (was: Re: Debian and the GFDL problem)

2006-01-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
problems, especially the obnoxious anti-DRM clause. A complete analysis is available at: http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Debian and the GFDL problem

2006-01-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
developers will make this work much easier to integrate. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom ___ desktop

Re: GDM version used for GNOME 2.24?

-- Thread Josselin Mouette
quot;006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> Re: GDM version used for GNOME 2.24? Josselin Mouette Re: GDM version used for GNOME 2.24? Patryk Zawadzki Re: GDM version used for GNOME 2.24? Patryk Zawadzki Re: GDM version used for GNOME 2.24? Andre Klapper

<    1   2