Re: Heads up: Geary mainline development branch renamed to `mainline`

On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 10:38 +0200, Niels De Graef via desktop-devel- list wrote: > Note that you don't need to script this kind of stuff, if you use the > following tricks: > > # 1. This creates a symbolic link from master to mainline, which > solves your problem already. > $ git symbolic-ref

Re: [GitLab] IMPORTANT: Mass migration plan

On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 11:22 +0100, Arnaud Bonatti wrote: > Hi Milan, > > 2018-03-21 8:53 UTC+01:00, Milan Crha : > > Your module rename may mean also renaming in distributions, thus it > > should not be done in a rush and "just because we can". At least > > from my point of

Re: [GitLab] IMPORTANT: Mass migration plan

On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 06:28 -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > Any chance of getting > https://gitlab.gnome.org/Incubator/bztogl/issues/7 fixed before then? > > Not sure, I think impersonating is still something some people don't > agree with. It's what the Gitlab "Import from Github" feature

Re: Matrix as a replacement for Telepathy

On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 19:13 +0100, Matthew Hodgson wrote: > My proposal is that one could run a background daemon on Linux which > brokered the connection to your Matrix server (and perhaps handled > fun stuff like clientside history persistence, e2e encryption voodoo, > WebRTC audio

Re: Building GNOME in restrictive network environments

I just fixed all the .json manifests and .app files in the master branch of gnome-apps-nightly, as well as the .json manifest for the master branch of the GNOME Sdk. -- Mathieu On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 15:40 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > I've just gotten bitten by this as well, and have star

Re: Building GNOME in restrictive network environments

I've just gotten bitten by this as well, and have started moving all the ones in gnome-apps-nightly from git:// to https:// -- Mathieu On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 14:15 +0100, Bastian Ilso wrote: > We also experienced this issue at the newcomers workshop as many > flatpak manifests also download

Re: Pilot GitLab program

Hi, On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 08:42 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 10:54 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > We’ve been collecting the feedback on this wiki page: > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/DevelopmentInfrastructure/Commun > > ityInput > > c) I generate NEWS file from `git

Re: Pilot GitLab program

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 08:08 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Carlos Soriano   > wrote: > > Expect Nautilus and librsvg (with Federico) to move to the pilot  > > program this week. > > Cool. I would just suggest making sure that your interns

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 15:13 +0300, Adrian Perez de Castro wrote: > Hi there, > > No strong opinion here about GitLab, just a comment below... > > On Tue, 23 May 2017 11:21:25 +0200, Felipe Borges il.com> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Cons: > > - not a big fan of the

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 17:44 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Mathieu Bridon <boche...@daitauha.fr > > wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 16:47 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote: > > > IMO this is a completely broken and over-complicated workflow

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 16:47 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote: > IMO this is a completely broken and over-complicated workflow. For > long term contributors, having their own remote can be > understandable. > But for one-time contribs? One-time contributions can be done entirely in the web UI, for

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 15:55 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > If I'm a registered developer for the GNOME org, or that particular > module, I'd create my merge requests as wip branches in the main > repo?Or as branches in a separate repo that I have the control of? That would be up to you. Choose

Re: Stackexchange community for GNOME/GTK+

On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 09:30 -0400, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel- list wrote: > Is there some public place that offer something similar as AskFedora > to create a community for GNOME? > I think one requirement for us is to not host it ourselves, and still > be relevant. > I guess that's why Sri

Re: Gnome "opt-in" functionality.

Hi, On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 11:00 +0100, Sam Thursfield wrote: > You can disable Tracker's background indexing fairly easily, if you > don't mind that some things will get broken. In most distros, if you > move the files /etc/xdg/autostart/tracker*.desktop somewhere else, > then the Tracker

Re: builddir != srcdir in jhbuild breaks my workflow

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 08:09 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 5:43 AM Michael Catanzaro g> wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 21:25 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I've been thinking about the exact same thing recently; how about >

Re: help needed for OSK layout files

Hi, On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 15:49 +0900, Daiki Ueno wrote: Hello, There is a long-standing request that gnome-shell OSK should respect system's keyboard layout[1]. Though actually it works already, we are still missing the majority of layout files (see

Re: help needed for OSK layout files

On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 15:46 +0530, anish patil wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Would it make sense to add Caribou layouts for input methods? For example, the Cangjie input method uses the en_US layout

Re: Clone of 2048 for Gnome

On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 11:24 +0100, Alexandre Franke wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Marc-André Lureau marcandre.lur...@gmail.com wrote: - wouldn't it be nice to have some kind of congrats feedback when you reach 2048? That's the single thing that annoys me with the original 2048:

Re: libgsystem as a shared library

On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 11:24 -0500, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: I mean, copylibs have existed forever, usually by just copying files around from project A to project B, and back from project B to project A. Why does structuring this process in a git submodule make it suddenly illegal in Fedora

Re: Feature proposal: combined system status menu

On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 04:00 +0300, Luc Pionchon wrote: On 24 April 2013 02:14, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Marco Scannadinari ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote: I think your suggestion of a feature branch can be a worthy compromise, though.

Re: The name of applications on GNOME 3.7.92 testing image

On Saturday, March 23, 2013 02:11 AM, Maciej Piechotka wrote: On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 12:51 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: gedit is becoming more of a programmer's editor, so the gedit team wants to keep the gedit brand while people work on a new simple Notepad-equivalent that will be called

Re: Concerning Keyboard Status Menu

On Friday, November 23, 2012 01:42 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote: What I actually find very rude of you is that you seem to somehow interpret my messages as having some kind of background intent. I was asking a question

Re: Concerning Keyboard Status Menu

On Friday, November 23, 2012 06:01 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten wrote: Maybe should first step be listing different functional principles, for example * Input from sound (pinyin input methods) * Input from shape (canjie) * Input from shape (wubi) There will be a significant list, but not infinite.

Re: Concerning Keyboard Status Menu

[Note: I'm not a GNOME developer, I don't have Git access, I'm not part of any conspiracy, but I'm actively working on improving the inputting experience for Traditional Chinese in Hong Kong] On Thursday, November 22, 2012 05:01 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote: However, why the menu in keyboard status

Re: Concerning Keyboard Status Menu

On Friday, November 23, 2012 07:39 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote: In case you don't know. Unlike other language groups, Chinese users are used to the fact there are many third-party engines available for same input scheme and they would make a random or non-random choices between them. Could it be

Re: Concerning Keyboard Status Menu

On Friday, November 23, 2012 11:11 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Could it be because none of them are of sufficient quality that they feel the need to constantly try new ones, in the hopes that it will be better than