Il giorno dom, 23/09/2007 alle 20.31 +0300, Kalle Vahlman ha scritto:
Sorry, but I did get lost while trying Mercurial just now. I can't
understand why I need to merge something that I just committed. I
mean, I just modified a file, committed the change and then tried to
push the committed
Hi all,
In my opinion Mercurial has much of the benefits of GIT but with the
ease of use of SVN. We dropped GIT and SVN at my company in favor of
Mercurial.
In what way is Mercurial simpler to use than Git? Looking quickly at
the Mercurial docs it seemed quite similar to Git in terms
2007/9/23, Ali Sabil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
In my opinion Mercurial has much of the benefits of GIT but with the
ease of use of SVN. We dropped GIT and SVN at my company in favor of
Mercurial.
In what way is Mercurial simpler to use than Git? Looking quickly at
the
On 9/23/07, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/23, Ali Sabil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
In my opinion Mercurial has much of the benefits of GIT but with the
ease of use of SVN. We dropped GIT and SVN at my company in favor of
Mercurial.
In what way is
2007/9/23, Ali Sabil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/23/07, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/23, Ali Sabil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think as well that mercurial is very easy to use compared to git,
I don't get this argument, looking at
On 9/22/07, Ken VanDine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would agree with Sean, mercurial is very powerful yet easy to use.
Just my $0.02
Mercurial is written in Python (a plus or minus depending on your
viewpoint of patching and third party extensions) and it runs on
Windows/Mac/Linux. Last time
On 9/22/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22 sep 2007 kl. 16.05 skrev Sean Kelley:
Hi,
On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey:
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10
On 9/23/07, Sean Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think GIT is not a very user friendly SCM for those coming from
other version control systems. It is far too rough around the edges.
Will it get better? I am sure over time it will. But I certainly
wouldn't impose it on the multitude of
On 9/23/07, Jason D. Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/23/07, Sean Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think GIT is not a very user friendly SCM for those coming from
other version control systems. It is far too rough around the edges.
Will it get better? I am sure over time it will.
On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey:
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
- Keith Packard did a fairly extensive research of which DSCM
system
to use
I would agree with Sean, mercurial is very powerful yet easy to use.
Just my $0.02
--Ken
On 9/22/07, Sean Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey:
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod
22 sep 2007 kl. 16.05 skrev Sean Kelley:
Hi,
On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey:
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
- Keith Packard did a fairly
12 matches
Mail list logo
