ti., 12.02.2008 kl. 16.32 +0100, skrev Andre Klapper:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 17:11 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
So I suggest - delay the release. Delay Ubuntu LTS. Delay also other
distro releases. Why? Because not release date matters. What matters
here is a _product_. It should
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 19:58 +0200 schrieb Kalle Vahlman:
I suggest people either convert to doing the ports camp (yes I'm
looking at the list[1] for something within my power to port), to
testing the ports camp or at least stop acting like gio already
didn't make it.
just to avoid
I use ftp:// on Nautilus daily to connect to six-to-seven different FTP
servers on a GNOME 2.20 workstation at work. It's a little bit shaky,
but usable.
Now on GNOME 2.21.x at home, I use lftp on a terminal, 'cause I don't
fear typing :-).
However there are quite a lot of people out there
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 01:26 +0100, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
Moreover, a regression is a regression, and should be prioritized. Btw,
how much useful is having WebDAV and ObexFTP in before normal FTP
support?
No idea what is used the most or anything. But i use ObexFTP daily at
work transfering
Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
Op dinsdag 12-02-2008 om 13:30 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Shaun
McCance:
I've used it for grabbing tarballs from ftp.gnome.org. Unfortunately,
it's not as useful as it could be, since the gnome-vfs ftp backend
doesn't follow symlinks. So if you try to use
Op dinsdag 12-02-2008 om 13:30 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Shaun
McCance:
I've used it for grabbing tarballs from ftp.gnome.org. Unfortunately,
it's not as useful as it could be, since the gnome-vfs ftp backend
doesn't follow symlinks. So if you try to use Nautilus to grab all
the
2008/2/12, Andre Klapper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 19:58 +0200 schrieb Kalle Vahlman:
I suggest people either convert to doing the ports camp (yes I'm
looking at the list[1] for something within my power to port), to
testing the ports camp or at least stop acting like
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:20 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
ti., 12.02.2008 kl. 16.32 +0100, skrev Andre Klapper:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 17:11 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
So I suggest - delay the release. Delay Ubuntu LTS. Delay also other
distro releases. Why? Because not release
Hi,
I propose here a Sound Theme Specification on fdo. It is based
heavily on the Icon Theme Specification and still in
planning/requirements-gathering stage.
You should be able to read it via yelp:
git clone git://git.infradead.org/users/elmarco/sound-theme-spec.git
yelp
On Feb 12, 2008 12:58 PM, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's people determined to make this work and working hard to do
that, let's rather support them than make them feel rejected.
That was absolutely not my intent; if the problem is as bad as was
originally implied (that the .0
2008/2/12, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 11:37 -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-02-12 às 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha escreveu:
2008/2/12, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will
On Feb 12, 2008 11:15 AM, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 10:01 AM, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I can't say I'm happy about something like that though, since I spent
the last 1.5 years or so
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 17:11 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
So I suggest - delay the release. Delay Ubuntu LTS. Delay also other
distro releases. Why? Because not release date matters. What matters
here is a _product_. It should be usable, it should be documented,
it is *definitely*
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
But agreed that the right thing to do is to delay the release rather
than release a .0 with substantial regressions (as I ranted on a bit
at my blog and on gnome-bugsquad.)
I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:38 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
I'm not sold on the fact that there are many important regressions.
The
main regressions, in my mind, are the ftp backend, the network
backend
and the connect dialog. There might be some other regressions, but
I've
not noticed
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:28:21AM -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying
Em Ter, 2008-02-12 às 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha escreveu:
Hi,
2008/2/12, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without regressions.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously,
releasing Nautilus with too many or some big regressions is not a good
plan.
More for
Le mardi 12 février 2008, à 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
Hi,
2008/2/12, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without
Hi,
2008/2/12, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without regressions.
Why aren't we talking about punting it until GNOME 2.23/24?
On Feb 12, 2008 8:53 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 08:42 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 08:42 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without regressions.
Why aren't we talking about punting it until GNOME
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 11:20 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 11:15 AM, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 10:01 AM, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I can't say I'm happy about something like
Hi,
I propose here a Sound Theme Specification on fdo. It is based
heavily on the Icon Theme Specification and still in
planning/requirements-gathering stage.
You should be able to read it via yelp:
git clone git://git.infradead.org/users/elmarco/sound-theme-spec.git
yelp
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 09:28 -0500 schrieb Luis Villa:
On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying
Yeah, i also don't see the regressions as major. I mean, its not like
gnome-vfs is bugfree. The reason we're going from it is because its
problematic.
I have to disgraee. I think they are. The end user is more likely to see
these regression than any bug or design issue that gnome-vfs has.
Hi Vincent and Alex,
2008/2/12, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le mardi 12 février 2008, à 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
Hi,
2008/2/12, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without regressions.
Why aren't we talking about punting it until GNOME 2.23/24? We've never
allowed this kind of thing before -
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:22 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
At this point, it's not just about nautilus. Other modules were ported
to gio... Reverting, while doable, would be painful.
I'm not sold on the fact that there are many important regressions. The
main regressions, in my mind, are the
On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously,
releasing Nautilus with too
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without regressions.
Why aren't we talking about punting it until GNOME 2.23/24? We've never
allowed this kind of thing before - punting would be entirely normal.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:59:58PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentythree
Note that:
* it is 28 weeks instead of 26. 1 additional week as 2.20 is 25,
another was needed to align with GUADEC (to prevent announcement
periods during GUADEC or releasing while
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:30 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
GVFS
NAUTILUS
There are still a bunch
Le jeudi 24 janvier 2008, à 10:25 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 17:48 +0100, Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
I do not like having to write the address in
the location bar to have it accessible on the Desktop
Try this:
* open smb://network/resource
Hi,
2008/2/12, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:59:58PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentythree
Note that:
* it is 28 weeks instead of 26. 1 additional week as 2.20 is 25,
another was needed to align with GUADEC (to prevent
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 14:27 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
However, as cosimo noticed, this somewhat overlaps with what bookmarks
can be used for too. If you put a bookmark to a network location you can
use that to easily mount the network mount too... Of course, then when
its mounted it
37 matches
Mail list logo
