Hey guys.
I was about to file a bug against a browser asking them to implement
some new ATK API, but that API isn't showing up on developer.gnome.org.
Furthermore, looking at https://developer.gnome.org/atk/, I see the
latest version is 2.28.1 even though 2.31.90 was released two weeks ago.
The A
On 05/25/2018 12:17 PM, Germán Poo-Caamaño wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018, 15:10 Joanmarie Diggs <mailto:jdi...@igalia.com>> wrote:
>
> Hey all.
>
> Subject says it all. What am I doing wrong? I'm in the .doap. My SSH key
> was uploaded a month ago
Hey all.
Subject says it all. What am I doing wrong? I'm in the .doap. My SSH key
was uploaded a month ago. Someone in #sysadmin indicated they had a
teammate who had to re-upload their key to solve a similar issue. So I
just did that. No luck. :(
Please advise. Thanks!
--joanie, Orca Maintainer
On 02/18/2016 07:35 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> While we are still waiting for 3.19.90 to appear, here is an initial
> review of the bugs that have been marked as "GNOME target: 3.20"
> during this cycle. Since this is the first review, the list is
> somewhat long, and a bit of a mixed bag, I expe
On 02/18/2016 07:35 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> While we are still waiting for 3.19.90 to appear, here is an initial
> review of the bugs that have been marked as "GNOME target: 3.20"
> during this cycle. Since this is the first review, the list is
> somewhat long, and a bit of a mixed bag, I exp
I'd like to add one myself, which I just filed:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745967
Thanks!
--joanie
On 03/08/2015 06:42 PM, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> Would it be possible to take a look at
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704619
> before 3.16?
>
> I know seahorse is i
On 10/20/2014 03:29 PM, Jim Nelson wrote:
[...]
> As far as proxying the DOM, I suspect the real performance problems are
> not in individual operations but operations involving iteration. (In
> other words, inserting a single DIV isn't an issue, but walking the tree
> looking for all DIVs of a
On 09/12/2014 05:24 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> Some other potential blockers:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736550 - gnome-weather:
> Forecast not available
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726505 - gnome-photos:
> Would be nice to have a smooth sliding transition between
On 02/25/2014 08:57 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I think 'Menu' is about right as accessible name for the gear menu ?
> After all, it is 'the menu'.
Symbolic icons communicate meaning visually. I think this meaning gets
lost when you replace the gear that is shown to sighted users with
'Menu'. 'M
On 02/25/2014 09:07 AM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 08:48 -0500, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
>>> The current feedback from the design team is to not set a tooltip for
>>> the cog menu button, but it would be great to have general guidelines
>>> for this
On 02/24/2014 09:08 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> Do Firefox or Chromium have established accessible names for their menu
> buttons?
Not really. Chromium's web content is inaccessible -- at least for our
platform -- so I hadn't taken a look until now. But all of its chrome
buttons seem to lack ac
Hey Paolo.
On 02/25/2014 03:52 AM, Paolo Borelli wrote:
> Hi Joanie,
>
> thanks for bringing this up.
Thank you for addressing it so quickly. :)
> I committed a first patch[1] addressing some of the most obvious
> problems, but I am sure there are more. Can you remind me if there are
> some
On 02/24/2014 09:04 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
>> Hey all.
>>
>> I just fired up Gedit and noticed the menubar is gone. I'm guessing we
>> will start to see more and more apps move in this direction, so a
Hey all.
I just fired up Gedit and noticed the menubar is gone. I'm guessing we
will start to see more and more apps move in this direction, so a couple
things I would ask app developers and designers to consider:
1. There should be an intuitive, consistent, immediate way to jump to
the widget
On 07/03/2012 05:04 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 09:23 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:44:52AM -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
>>> As per earlier discussions, I am proposing that we target GNOME 3.8 as
>>> our first all Python
As per earlier discussions, I am proposing that we target GNOME 3.8 as
our first all Python 3 release.
Frederic Peters already did the list of modules impacted:
http://people.gnome.org/~fpeters/reports/python3.html
Are there any reasons why we should not do this?
Take care.
--joanie
On 06/25/2012 08:50 AM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 08:48 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
[...]
>> So, after giving this a weekend, I don't think we can do a python 2->3
>> transition for 3.6 without some advance planning.
>> And having both python2 and pyt
On 06/25/2012 08:48 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
>> Hey all.
>>
>> Migrating Orca to Python 3 has been on the to-do list for a while now.
>> Upon being told that Ubuntu was hoping to have its next release be al
Hey Martin.
On 06/25/2012 01:54 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Joanmarie,
>
> Joanmarie Diggs [2012-06-22 12:30 -0400]:
>> This change, unfortunately, makes jhbuild unhappy when building Orca
>> (and later Accerciser) in an environment which lacks Python 3 versions
>>
Hey all.
Migrating Orca to Python 3 has been on the to-do list for a while now.
Upon being told that Ubuntu was hoping to have its next release be all
Python 3 (at least for their live CD), I decided to go ahead and do it.
That work has been committed to master. Furthermore, the Accessibility
Team
Hey Matthias.
On 05/15/2012 12:31 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> At the release team meeting last weekend, we've discussed that we want
> to revitalize the Gnome Goals [1] effort by adopting a few goals for
> this cycle. We've chosen the following goals:
>
> GSettingsMigration
> XDGConfigFolders
>
Hey guys.
Periodically I wonder about projects.gnome.org versus live.gnome.org:
Some modules and groups use one, some use the other, others use both. As
I'm currently in the process of cleaning up the Orca wiki (and recently
did the same for the Accessibility Team wiki), I figured I'd wonder
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 20:32 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Piñeiro wrote:
>
> > Module proposed
> > ===
> >
> > In order to fulfill this feature, we propose Dots which already uses the
> > GNOME infrastructure [2][3][4].
>
> Can you describe a bit m
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:30, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 28 August 2011 08:18, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > We pushed it back to make it rock, so we count on you to deliver your
> > tarballs on time, this is before Monday 23:59 UTC. Thanks!
>
> Monday is a bank holiday in the UK, so I have to wor
Hi Felipe.
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 23:50 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
[...]
> >> === 01. Which of the following images best resemble your desktop? ===
> >> (image selection)
> >>
> >> - GNOME 2
&g
Hi Felipe, all.
While I've been watching this all go by, I've not jumped in largely
due to being crazy-busy. Sorry about that! While the crazy-busy
situation has not yet changed, I couldn't help but notice this:
> === 01. Which of the following images best resemble your desktop? ===
> (image sele
Hey Allan.
> > But past interactions have (in my
> > personal experience) been negative.
>
> Can you elaborate?
Yes, but I was (and am) somewhat hesitant to because I honestly don't
wish to stir pots. I'd rather just move forward in a positive direction.
And perhaps you read my mind in that reg
Hey all.
I was planning on staying out of this one, conflict-avoidant creature
that I tend to be. But I'm with Dave:
> To sum it all up, I
> believe the current dynamic of the design team is doing damage to GNOME
> as a community.
I would love to find ways for the design team and the accessi
Hi Fred.
> We are moving away of the idea of approving/rejecting individual
> modules and considering the features we want in GNOME. In that
> direction we'd say that whatever is needed for Orca to do its work
> is ok. Of course this calls for some common sense, to keep some
> coherence in our sta
Hey all.
Looking at the 2.91 External Dependencies list [1], I see neither Speech
Dispatcher nor OpenTTS. OpenTTS got approved for the prior cycle. [2]
But they've since re-merged (unforked?) with Speech Dispatcher. So
Do I need to propose Speech Dispatcher as an external dependency needed
by
Hey guys.
> > It is second class I don't think there is any point in whitewashing
> > it. Whether or not you get something that barely works has everything
> > to do with how much attention it gets in design, development, and
> > testing. If you want to use something for a fallback that won't
>
Hey all.
I have what feels like a silly question, but that's never stopped me
before. ;-)
Tomorrow, for instance, is UI Freeze. Tomorrow is also when the 2.31.90
tarballs are due. Should I interpret this to mean our last-minute UI
changes need to be included the tarball I create because that is w
Hi Andre.
> Personally I expected but have not yet seen proposals for
> * a GOK replacement[1] (caribou?)
> * a replacement for gnome-speech[2] (opentts?)
I thought Luke Yelavich had (or was going to) propose OpenTTS.
--joanie
___
des
Hi all.
Maybe I'm just a lousy googler, but how does one get an @gnome.org
address? I ask because of this sort of thing:
http://twitter.com/macosforge/status/7960326131
Thanks in advance. Take care.
--joanie
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 22:20 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 11/22/2009 10:11 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> > I don't think it's explicitly overriding it, it's just that the
> > innermost widget wins for key bindings; and in a TextView
> > Ctrl-PageUp/PageDown are start-of-line and end-of-line.
>
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 16:32 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Joanmarie Diggs
> wrote:
> > Hi Behdad.
> >
> > On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 18:57 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> >
> >> As a user, I tend to agree with that sentiment.
Hi Behdad.
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 18:57 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> As a user, I tend to agree with that sentiment. While I understand the
> usefulness of ctrl+tab, it's not as handy and useful as rotating between tabs.
> So, what can we do about it?
Doesn't Ctrl + PageUp/PageDown accomplis
Hi all.
I happen to be on the gcalctool list where Robert announced that he'd
begun making some major changes to the UI. Having this much lead time
makes it possible for us to update Orca's support for gcalctool, file
bugs, and when possible submit patches. Orca + gcalctool should be great
for 2.3
I'll leave it to the Yelp maintainer to answer that question. But FWIW,
it took (what felt like) quite a while to have accessible help for the
GNOME desktop -- a topic which was regularly raised on the Orca users
list. Now we have it. I think it would be a shame to take this valuable
tool away from
t to chime in here - based upon our experiences with Gecko,
> >> accessibility support for browsers is no trivial task. Xan and Joanie
> >> have been hammering away at an impressive pace so far.
> >>
> >> Joanie, Xan - what do you think it would take to hit 2.28?
s is no trivial task. Xan and Joanie
> have been hammering away at an impressive pace so far.
>
> Joanie, Xan - what do you think it would take to hit 2.28? Would more
> people from the WebKit internals side help?
>
> Will
>
> Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> > Hi
Hi all.
I think it's safe to say that implementing accessibility for something
as complex as WebKit is not a trivial task. :-) When I originally looked
at WebKit's accessibility a year or so ago, I was really concerned; now
I'm excited about it. Already there are things in WebKit which
JustWork(tm
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:53 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
> > In any case let's try to do our best here, and in a few more weeks I'm
> > sure we'll have a clearer picture of where we'll stand by 2.28.
>
> So a few more weeks have passed. Do we have a clearer picture? :-)
>
> Looking at the NE
Hey Will, all.
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 09:58 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Willie: do you have any idea when the a11y team would be able to give a
> > +1 for webkit? Being able to know it's okay as soon as possible would
> > definitely help us organize things.
>
> I'm CC'ing
For whatever it's worth:
> Joanmarie Diggs works for Sun on accessibility (mostly Orca).
I happen to be a volunteer. :-) I'm very proud of my association with
the Accessibility Program Office of Sun and really enjoy the work I do
on Orca. And I can honestly say that I've never
45 matches
Mail list logo
