to take over gnome-panel
maintaining.
that's not how it works.
I strongly suggest you discuss it with him, calmly, and productively,
in order to amicably solve this issue.
Does not look that it is possible otherwise I would not write this mail.
if nothing happens, you can create a clone
Hi,
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-panel/stats/?period=yofs=25 shows
the general commit activity per year, in case you want numbers.
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 21:48 +0300, Alberts Muktupāvels wrote:
What about maintainers that used to maintain gnome-panel while it was
official part? Can
-DGTK_DISABLE_SINGLE_INCLUDES -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGSEAL_ENABLE `pkg-config --cflags --libs
gtk+-3.0 libpanelapplet-4.0` *.cpp -o helloworld
Error message:
--
/usr/include/gnome-panel-4.0/libpanel-applet/panel-applet.h:169:13:
error: ‘GtkActionGroup’ has
-4.0` *.cpp -o helloworld
Error message:
--
/usr/include/gnome-panel-4.0/libpanel-applet/panel-applet.h:169:13: error:
‘GtkActionGroup’ has not been declared
GtkActionGroup *action_group);
GtkActionGroup is deprecated, and you're disabling
Hi,
I don't find how to launch gnome-panel when gnome starts. I have tried
to add an entry in gnome-session-properties without success.
So far I run: gnome-panel --replace after gnome has started.
Thanks for your help.
Marc
___
desktop-devel-list
On 14/10/13 13:19, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
2013/10/14 Marc des Garets m...@ttux.net:
Hi,
I don't find how to launch gnome-panel when gnome starts. I have tried to
add an entry in gnome-session-properties without success.
So far I run: gnome-panel --replace after gnome has started.
You
in the
schema -- the path is defined by gnome-panel for your applet.
Vincent
In that case, there is probably a bug in that function, see my
following patch here, these few lines completely fixed it for me:
And this change is fine. The settings won't be per-applet, though, but
for all instances
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 10:54 +0200, Lanoxx wrote:
Add wanda the fish to the gnome panel. Then right click - preferences
- set frame rate to 0.2 (original 0.3). Close and remove wanda from the
gnome panel. Now go to Add to panel click on wanda - add
This crashes my whole gnome panel. Can
Le lundi 27 août 2012, à 10:54 +0200, Lanoxx a écrit :
On 27/08/12 10:41, Lanoxx wrote:
On 27/08/12 08:56, Vincent Untz wrote:
Note that, afaik, g_settings_new_with_path() works fine. It's used in
several applets. See for instance
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-panel/tree/applets/fish
Hi!
I thought about one interesting question - does ported GNOME Panel has
any GObject Introspection support? If not, maybe it is worth to add
it?
Just a thought,
Happy End Of The Year Time,
Peteris.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel
On 23 December 2011 12:32, pec...@gmail.com pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I thought about one interesting question - does ported GNOME Panel has
any GObject Introspection support? If not, maybe it is worth to add
it?
It does since 2.32: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622341
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:28, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
You may be aware that there was a recent initiative (from the marketing
team, I think) to contact the release managers for various GNOME based
I'm not sure who it might have been because this is the first I've heard of
any
Hi Johannes,
Johannes Schmid wrote:
GNOME 2.x will not get any more official support after the 2.32.1 relase
which already happened. Single module maintainers may decide (or have
already decided/done) to do more 2.32.x release to fix various bugs but
no more official releases are planned.
Hi Jon,
I'm confused...
William Jon McCann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Sure, it's not our priority nor target, in terms of development (and it
shouldn't be). But to a lot of people, fallback means you'll get some
ugly stuff that barely works,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi Johannes,
Johannes Schmid wrote:
GNOME 2.x will not get any more official support after the 2.32.1 relase
which already happened. Single module maintainers may decide (or have
already decided/done) to do more 2.32.x release
Hey guys.
It is second class I don't think there is any point in whitewashing
it. Whether or not you get something that barely works has everything
to do with how much attention it gets in design, development, and
testing. If you want to use something for a fallback that won't
really
Am Donnerstag, den 30.12.2010, 15:55 -0600 schrieb Brian Cameron:
Regardless of whether the
GNOME community provides any more official support after 2.32.1, distros
will continue to support their supported products.
Distros could work together in these efforts. I see no reason why such
Le mercredi 29 décembre 2010 à 15:22 -0500, William Jon McCann a
écrit :
That simple JS based fallback panel/menubar idea is sounding better
and better... anyone want to give it a shot?
This would be completely useless. Who would use that?
People are not attached to the panel just because
once installed.
You can also expect that installers won't be providing a choice between
version 2 and version 3 of GNOME, but rather a choice between
gnome-panel and gnome-shell, with gnome-panel possibly being the
default.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
categories again in the
menu. So in the future, please don't express opinion on things that you
haven't tested. And again this thread is not about gnome-shell features
but about what we provide as fallback or what the future of gnome-panel
is.
If some interested people would put more resources
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:54:04AM -0500, Bill O'Connor wrote:
You can also expect that installers won't be providing a choice between
version 2 and version 3 of GNOME, but rather a choice between
gnome-panel and gnome-shell, with gnome-panel possibly being the
default.
Which distribution do
Le jeudi 30 décembre 2010 à 13:08 +0100, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
Sidenote: check jhbuild of gnome-shell, it has categories again in the
menu.
It is great to learn this has been finally fixed, thanks.
So in the future, please don't express opinion on things that you
haven't tested.
I’m
Johannes Schmid wrote:
For example, I cannot personally consider the shell as usable as long as
it features those unusable two-dimensional iPhone menus - not counting
the fact I don’t own hardware that can run it. The panel’s menu is
simply better thought.
Sidenote: check jhbuild of
-3D shell that could act as a
fallback. As we have gnome-panel already it was choosen as the
fallback mode.
Is it an indication of a problem in gnome3 architecture?
I don't see any problem here.
I agree that there is no problem with GNOME moving towards OpenGL and
acceleration. As you suggest
-experience in the future which will likely use some
components of the GNOME 2.x stack but ported to GNOME 3 technologies (no
parallel installation required). Until now, this experience seems to end
up as metacity + gnome-panel + Applications. This is not a continuation
of GNOME 2.x even if a lot
will maintain
a non-3D user-experience in the future which will likely use some
components of the GNOME 2.x stack but ported to GNOME 3 technologies (no
parallel installation required). Until now, this experience seems to end
up as metacity + gnome-panel + Applications. This is not a continuation
of GNOME 2
installation required). Until now, this experience seems to end
up as metacity + gnome-panel + Applications. This is not a continuation
of GNOME 2.x even if a lot of code might be shared.
This is great and enough, for me at least. Thanks for clarifying
things :-D
signature.asc
Description
for a 3.0 panel.
I'm talking about gnome panel from git master, vuntz added support for
bonobo applets to make the transition easier.
Anyway, we need vuntz for the real answer.
I'm not sure, but I think the idea was dropping bonobo support when
most of applets are ported to dbus
Le mardi 28 décembre 2010 à 16:53 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos a écrit :
Is the GNOME 3 panel compatible with the GNOME 2 applets?
There's no gnome 3 panel, gnome-panel hasn't been ported to gtk3 yet,
there's a branch but it's outdated and it still doesn't work.
That’s good then. But does
a matter of buying a new computer,
my previous laptop was a modern one, but the nvidia card made imposssible
to use gnome-shell for more than 5 minutes. So, my point is, if we
want to provide a fallback for those people and we are going to use
gnome-panel and metacity because they are already there, why
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos
carlo...@gnome.org wrote:
If I couldn't use gnome-shell, I
would still want to upgrade all other modules to 3.0 and use a
fallback mode without loosing the weather applet, for example.
The standard answer here seems to be:
--
You may lose
drawing code path for gtk
at the time.
So, my point is, if we
want to provide a fallback for those people and we are going to use
gnome-panel and metacity because they are already there, why not keeping
the applets too for the same reason?
because resources are limited, and we cannot spread
)
nvidia also used to have problem with xrender, making cairo (and gtk)
slower - and yet nobody asked for a fallback drawing code path for gtk
at the time.
So, my point is, if we
want to provide a fallback for those people and we are going to use
gnome-panel and metacity because
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:19 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
It will be important to get people writing extensions before the
release happens i think. (sorry went into marketing mode...!)
I take the liberty of saying that as person who tried to write an
extension (some time ago):
- Lack of
Le mercredi 29 décembre 2010 à 00:54 -0800, Sandy Armstrong a écrit :
You may lose features in 3.0 *with* gnome-shell, and you may lose even
more features in 3.0 *without* gnome-shell. These features will take
time to return in 3.2, 3.4, etc.
Folks who don't want to lose features like this
Hi!
So, if by upgrading g-c-c, g-s-d, g-session and other major components
to 3.0, we are going to break g-panel, I’d like to know that now, not
when it is too late and 3.0 has already been released.
The gnome-panel shipped in fallback mode will/should work with GNOME 3
components. That's
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org
wrote:
Sergey, who sometimes prefers to look backwards rather than forward
no problem with that. you can maintain the old user experience for
yourself and
Le mercredi 29 décembre 2010, à 09:34 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le mardi 28 décembre 2010 à 16:53 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos a écrit :
Is the GNOME 3 panel compatible with the GNOME 2 applets?
There's no gnome 3 panel, gnome-panel hasn't been ported to gtk3 yet,
there's
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mardi 28 décembre 2010, à 15:20 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
However, the fallback is meant as a fallback, not as providing
gnome-panel and its applets. So I don't see anything wrong with not
providing
.
After the KDE4.0 debacle I suspect some of those who still ship it are not
going to be too keen to jump to GNOME 3 by default before everything is
ready and supporting it.
It's OK if we lose a few weird applets, but not if gnome-panel loses
significant features people will miss badly.
See KDE
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:19 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
It will be important to get people writing extensions before the
release happens i think. (sorry went into marketing mode...!)
I take the liberty of
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 13:41 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Maciej Piechotka
uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:19 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
It will be important to get people writing extensions
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm sorry if I sound accusing of something. I wanted to point out what I
found to be biggest limitation of writing extensions to gnome-shell.
I gave up very quickly due to time limitations - I had done none work at
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
It's OK if we lose a few weird applets, but not if gnome-panel loses
significant features people will miss badly.
Totally disagree when it is meant to be called anything other than
'fallback'.
Fallback is clear: unsupported
if someone interested) - and GNOME is
going to provide them with just crooks, not a real solution. I am sure
one of the most important reasons people choose GNOME2 compatibility
mode is the applets (I guess noone thinks that gnome-panel itself is
so attractive that people cannot live without
provide url if someone interested) - and GNOME is
going to provide them with just crooks, not a real solution. I am sure
one of the most important reasons people choose GNOME2 compatibility
mode is the applets (I guess noone thinks that gnome-panel itself is
so attractive that people cannot live
What you want is not Gnome 3 then. You want to continue using Gnome 2
and there's no one preventing you from doing that.
So, why bother maintaining gnome2 support mode at all? go to hell,
just do not upgrade is unbeatable argument, I must admit.
Actually, your advice effectively stops people
guess noone thinks that gnome-panel itself is
so attractive that people cannot live without it). To be honest, not
them, us - because personally I am going to stay in that mode as
long as possible, so I really would like to have it working.
What you want is not Gnome 3 then. You want
as a
fallback. As we have gnome-panel already it was choosen as the fallback
mode.
BTW, nobody forbids you to create a gnome-sergeys-applets module that is
compatible with the GNOME3 gnome-panel and ships all the applets you
want. But it will just not be part of the default moduleset.
Regards,
Johannes
As pointed out before the fallback-mode is not a continuation of GNOME 2.
It was just the easiest way to create a fallback because we don't have the
resources to create a non-3D shell that could act as a fallback. As we have
gnome-panel already it was choosen as the fallback mode
Le mardi 28 décembre 2010 à 13:02 +, Rui Tiago Cação Matos a écrit :
What you want is not Gnome 3 then. You want to continue using Gnome 2
and there's no one preventing you from doing that.
Is the GNOME 3 panel compatible with the GNOME 2 applets?
If so, that’s fine. We distributors can
It seems, there are, in theory, 5 options for fallback/compatibility:
1. Make g-s and mutter scalable down to envs without 3d
2. Provide full compat/fallback mode, with panel and applets
3. Provide restricted fallback mode, only gnome-panel, just enough to do
smth
4. Same as #3, just very basic
compatible with the GNOME 2 applets?
There's no gnome 3 panel, gnome-panel hasn't been ported to gtk3 yet,
there's a branch but it's outdated and it still doesn't work.
If so, that’s fine. We distributors can keep on shipping gnome-applets
as we do today, with the 2.32 version
and there's no one preventing you from doing that.
Is the GNOME 3 panel compatible with the GNOME 2 applets?
Only with dbus applets, AFAIK (and hope).
gnome-panel currently supports both dbus and bonobo applets.
IIRC some work is needed on gnome-applets to port them properly to
latest gtk
you want is not Gnome 3 then. You want to continue using Gnome 2
and there's no one preventing you from doing that.
Is the GNOME 3 panel compatible with the GNOME 2 applets?
Only with dbus applets, AFAIK (and hope).
gnome-panel currently supports both dbus and bonobo applets
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 13:42 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
As pointed out before the fallback-mode is not a continuation of
GNOME 2. It was just the easiest way to create a fallback because we
don't have the resources to create a non-3D shell that could act as a
fallback. As we have gnome
(and hope).
gnome-panel currently supports both dbus and bonobo applets.
Are you talking about the 3.0 version? I'd expect bonobo to be dropped
for a 3.0 panel.
I'm talking about gnome panel from git master, vuntz added support for
bonobo applets to make the transition easier.
Anyway
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 05:53:35PM +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
Excerpts from Olav Vitters's message of mar dic 28 17:25:31 +0100 2010:
Are you talking about the 3.0 version? I'd expect bonobo to be dropped
for a 3.0 panel.
I'm talking about gnome panel from git master, vuntz added
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
Also for 2.x? For 3.0 I don't expect anything other than no bonobo, as
bonobo is deprecated and we're dropping all deprecated stuff. My only
wonder is regarding gnome-panel + applets being the fallback option.. so
'applets
Il giorno mar, 28/12/2010 alle 16.50 +, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 13:42 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
Sergey, who sometimes prefers to look backwards rather than forward
no problem with that. you can maintain the old user experience for
yourself and never
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
Sergey, who sometimes prefers to look backwards rather than forward
no problem with that. you can maintain the old user experience for
yourself and never upgrade.
and snarkyness is never going to get you anything,
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 23:07 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno mar, 28/12/2010 alle 16.50 +, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 13:42 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
Sergey, who sometimes prefers to look backwards rather than forward
no problem with that. you can
2010/12/28 Sergey Udaltsov sergey.udalt...@gmail.com
What you want is not Gnome 3 then. You want to continue using Gnome 2
and there's no one preventing you from doing that.
So, why bother maintaining gnome2 support mode at all? go to hell,
just do not upgrade is unbeatable argument, I must
from metacity + gnome-panel
+ a bunch of applets. users will go away sooner, as they always do when
a project is perceived to be stagnating.
so we can chose to change the user experience to something that might
attract new users, and maybe lose a bit of some hard core and vocal
minority
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
by the way, this whole thread is pretty angry and confrontational - or,
at least, it feels a lot that way.
It has. I think though as a project we're not quite managing this as well
as we could. Not enough context for
Hi!
Am Dienstag, den 28.12.2010, 15:44 -0800 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
I have the perception that information on what all is going on is
getting lost in the noise. What is the canonical point where
information on this stuff need to flow to? Seems to me you need to
pick someone or maybe
I generally agree with what you said, so I won't reply to every thing.
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:44 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com
wrote:
by the way, this whole thread is pretty angry and
confrontational -
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net wrote:
for nvidia, gnome-shell is not usable with proprietary driver
What do you mean by this? Every time I've tested on nvidia hardware
with the proprietary driver, shell performance has been totally
usable. It's not lightning
What do you mean by this? Every time I've tested on nvidia hardware
with the proprietary driver, shell performance has been totally
usable. It's not lightning fast, but I don't think any hardware
change would fix that.
Usable is a rather hard to quantify thing. Not lightning fast to some
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Sandy Armstrong
sanfordarmstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net wrote:
for nvidia, gnome-shell is not usable with proprietary driver
What do you mean by this? Every time I've tested on nvidia hardware
with the
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
What do you mean by this? Every time I've tested on nvidia hardware
with the proprietary driver, shell performance has been totally
usable. It's not lightning fast, but I don't think any hardware
change would fix that.
Le 27 déc. 2010 15:42, Sandy Armstrong sanfordarmstr...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net wrote:
for nvidia, gnome-shell is not usable with proprietary driver
What do you mean by this? Every time I've tested on nvidia hardware
with the
Le 25 déc. 2010 00:16, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de a écrit :
Hi Dave!
Do you have any figures on what percentage of Linux users will have the
3D capabilities necessary? Just wondering.
Do you have statistics about what hardware people use with Linux? Than
it is easy to find out. But
Hi Jon,
On 12/24/2010 12:32 AM, William Jon McCann wrote:
It is important to note that there is no such classic mode. There
is a fallback mode for when 3D support is not available.
Do you have any figures on what percentage of Linux users will have the
3D capabilities necessary? Just
confused, what's the story with gnome-panel and gnome-applets in
3.0? Are they in, are they out? If gnome 3 is to support gnome2 compat
mode, both of these components should stay in for some while, right?
Currently, the situation in in jhbuild is very strange: gnome-panel is
still
that.
I don't know if there are plans to work on gnome-panel for gnome 3,
but in this moment the panel is exactly the same, or even worse since
it doesn't even work with gtk3.
Is it a good idea to make gnome-panel work with gtk3? Will that break
all the gtk2 applets out there in the world which
Hi Dave!
Do you have any figures on what percentage of Linux users will have the
3D capabilities necessary? Just wondering.
Do you have statistics about what hardware people use with Linux? Than
it is easy to find out. But all newer ( 5 years) Intel, AMD/ATI and
NVidia chips work so that
Hi,
Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
I am confused, what's the story with gnome-panel and gnome-applets in
3.0? Are they in, are they out? If gnome 3 is to support gnome2 compat
mode, both of these components should stay in for some while, right?
Currently, the situation in in jhbuild is very strange
Excerpts from Frederic Peters's message of jue dic 23 10:22:40 +0100 2010:
Hi,
Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
I am confused, what's the story with gnome-panel and gnome-applets in
3.0? Are they in, are they out? If gnome 3 is to support gnome2 compat
mode, both of these components should stay
they located in the Shell design. Clearly, network, keyboard, power, a11y,
sound, bluetooth, system, applications and clock are staying. Probably
launchers. Places is a long-term unknown. There are going to be others; the
list is still a work in-progress.
GNOME 2 fallback experience should be gnome-panel
-term unknown. There are going to be others; the list is still a
work in-progress.
GNOME 2 fallback experience should be gnome-panel, metacity
and
gnome-applets.
It's a fallback but it's also going in to long-term maintenance mode
which means we need to have a coherent
Hi Carlos,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Carlos Garcia Campos
carlo...@gnome.org wrote:
Excerpts from Frederic Peters's message of jue dic 23 10:22:40 +0100 2010:
Hi,
Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
I am confused, what's the story with gnome-panel and gnome-applets in
3.0
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Juanjo Marin juanjomari...@yahoo.es wrote:
Though I agree that we must planning the future, we also need to give a
migration path for our users. There are big deployments out there, and
sometimes they need _time_ for evaluating the new features, updating
their
I am confused, what's the story with gnome-panel and gnome-applets in
3.0? Are they in, are they out? If gnome 3 is to support gnome2 compat
mode, both of these components should stay in for some while, right?
Currently, the situation in in jhbuild is very strange: gnome-panel is
still
Confused as well.
On 14 December 2010 16:49, Sergey Udaltsov sergey.udalt...@gmail.com wrote:
I am confused, what's the story with gnome-panel and gnome-applets in
3.0? Are they in, are they out? If gnome 3 is to support gnome2 compat
mode, both of these components should stay in for some
Le jeudi 14 octobre 2010, à 15:38 +0200, Jan de Groot a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:50 -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
Hi, folks.
Will we have a gnome-panel ported to gtk3? We need it for gnome 3 as
fallback for gnome-shell, right?
It will eventually, yes. Help welcome, etc. Note
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:50 -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
Hi, folks.
Will we have a gnome-panel ported to gtk3? We need it for gnome 3 as
fallback for gnome-shell, right?
Porting gnome-panel will be pain I think, at least when we're talking
about the bonobo applet loader plugin
Hi, folks.
Will we have a gnome-panel ported to gtk3? We need it for gnome 3 as
fallback for gnome-shell, right?
Cheers,
--
Jonh Wendell
http://www.bani.com.br
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
Hello, My name is Reda Lazri, I have an idea that needs some attention:
It's the ability to change the icons in the notification area, you might
understand in you just saw the mockup:
http://0rax0.deviantart.com/art/Gnome-panel-improved-156723192
I really need someone to think about
On 10/03/10 05:02 PM, rAX wrote:
http://0rax0.deviantart.com/art/Gnome-panel-improved-156723192
I really need someone to think about this, and whether or not it
should/could be implemented.
Seems to me that would severely complicate theming.
If the custom icon was saved in ~/.icons, it would
Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menus
(Places, System and Applications) and why there haven't been wilder
scale discussion about it?
I know there's have been some disagreement about having or not having
too much icons in GNOME system, but it seems someone is tired
Hi angry user,
well... just install and run gconf-editor and change the
/desktop/gnome/interface/menus_have_icons key. (if I remember well)
:)
You may found other interesting things in gconf by the way.
Enjoy.
/MB
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel
Am Montag, den 07.09.2009, 12:25 +0300 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menus
(Places, System and Applications) and why there haven't been wilder
scale discussion about it?
Everything has been written and said about this already.
The decision
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:25:20PM +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
I know there's have been some disagreement about having or not having
too much icons in GNOME system, but it seems someone is tired of
arguing and have taken matters in their own hands. Results are awful
in my very personal
2009/9/7 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
Am Montag, den 07.09.2009, 12:25 +0300 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menus
(Places, System and Applications) and why there haven't been wilder
scale discussion about it?
Everything has been written
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 13:46 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
2009/9/7 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
Am Montag, den 07.09.2009, 12:25 +0300 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menus
(Places, System and Applications) and why there haven't been wilder
Le lundi 07 septembre 2009, à 12:25 +0300, Peteris Krisjanis a écrit :
Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menus
(Places, System and Applications) and why there haven't been wilder
scale discussion about it?
The icons for categories in the applications menu are back, which
boxes.
Please, tell me someone is willing to patch this for me, I've got $10 in my
paypal account I'll give them, plus a cookie. I saw a bug report on the ubuntu
launchpad site submitted about this in 2006! And don't tell me you are getting
rid of gnome-panel, this can be fixed anyway, please
Hi
My system is ubuntu 8.04
I check the /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu, I can see that not all the
submenu is actually show in the gnome-panel
And also not all the app is show in each submenu or category.
I can see that in UI interface, I can config which item is show and which
Le lundi 10 novembre 2008, à 18:25 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit :
Hi
My system is ubuntu 8.04
I check the /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu, I can see that not all the
submenu is actually show in the gnome-panel
And also not all the app is show in each submenu or category.
I can see
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
