Le lundi 28 juillet 2008 à 00:31 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Homepage: http://projecthamster.wordpress.com/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://code.google.com/p/projecthamster/source/checkout
Proposal on d-d-l:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00138.html
License: GPLv3
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When reviewing hamster license, we discover some inconsistencies :
- project webpage states LGPL
- tarball contains GPLv2
- some files mentions GPLv3 or later.
Sorry for the confusion. It seems Toms forgot to replace
Le mardi 05 août 2008, à 17:01 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When reviewing hamster license, we discover some inconsistencies :
- project webpage states LGPL
- tarball contains GPLv2
- some files mentions GPLv3 or
2008/7/28 Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dave Neary wrote:
In general, I'd hate for this app is mostly useless to be a heavily
Well, I don't think it is useful for most people is not quite the
same. This is just that nobody I know is doing time tracking, so I
consider it a niche
2008/7/30 Mathias Hasselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Mittwoch, den 30.07.2008, 12:55 +0300 schrieb Kalle Vahlman:
2008/7/28 Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dave Neary wrote:
In general, I'd hate for this app is mostly useless to be a heavily
Well, I don't think it is useful for most
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'm not arguing that time tracking is *not* suited for desktop, I'm just
saying it probably would be a *better* match in the office suite (which,
as you point out, is a bit loose definition currently).
I'd say it would be
Vincent Untz wrote:
Homepage: http://projecthamster.wordpress.com/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://code.google.com/p/projecthamster/source/checkout
Proposal on d-d-l:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00138.html
License: GPLv3 (or is it GPLv3 or later?)
Short description:
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:34 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
Vincent Untz wrote:
Homepage: http://projecthamster.wordpress.com/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://code.google.com/p/projecthamster/source/checkout
Proposal on d-d-l:
On 7/30/08, John Stowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But when I tried hamster applet, there was no such information to be
seen. I would have expected to see incomplete tasks as possible
activities.
Works here with 2.23.4 in Intrepid, I have no evo python...
greetings.
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 21:13 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
On 7/30/08, John Stowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But when I tried hamster applet, there was no such information to be
seen. I would have expected to see incomplete tasks as possible
activities.
Works here with
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:16 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Vincent Untz wrote:
Project Hamster is a nifty time tracking applet for the Gnome desktop.
It helps to keep track on how much time has been spent during the day on
set up activities.
It is nifty, but I don't think it is useful
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 09:40 -0700, Luis Villa wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
motivating reason for rejection, also... most of the apps we ship are
mostly useless to most of our users.
Do you think so ? It may be I almost perfectly matched
Hi,
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 09:40 -0700, Luis Villa wrote:
This is exactly the kind of app that makes me think we should have
certification for non-core applications- a way to say 'this is great
and useful and GNOME-y' (which it is) without saying 'this a part of
the core
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 17:04 +0200 schrieb Rodrigo Moya:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:16 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
It is nifty, but I don't think it is useful for most people; and I
don't want the GNOME desktop to become a collection of all the cool
apps that are on gnomefiles.org (or
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Andre Klapper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So from a technical point of view, how hard would it be to integrate
hamster into gnome-applets? Might be trivial idiot question by me who
doesn't hack himself.
vuntz says 30 minutes of work, I guess, but shall I trust
2008-07-29 klockan 17:50 skrev Patryk Zawadzki:
(and likely add python dependency to the applets module if not already
there).
It's already there, e.g. the stock quotes applet is written in Python.
mvrgr, Wouter
--
:wq mail [EMAIL
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Matthias Clasen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little minus on integration (admittedly a pet peeve of mine): This
is yet another app
that does its own homegrown preference for a hotkey. This should
nowadays be done
by installing an xml file for the keybinding
Hi,
Vincent Untz wrote:
Summary so far:
===
+ not hosted in the GNOME infrastructure, but willing to migrate
+ many releases since the proposal
+ some discussion about using e-d-s instead of sqlite. It seems
the maintainers prefer to stay with sqlite
+ some people like
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 10:13 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Matthias Clasen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little minus on integration (admittedly a pet peeve of mine): This
is yet another app
that does its own homegrown preference for a hotkey. This should
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 10:13 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Matthias Clasen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little minus on integration (admittedly a pet peeve of mine): This
is yet another
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Matthias Clasen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little minus on integration (admittedly a pet peeve of mine): This
is yet another app
that does its own homegrown preference for a hotkey. This should
nowadays be done
by installing an xml file for the keybinding
Vincent Untz wrote:
Project Hamster is a nifty time tracking applet for the Gnome desktop.
It helps to keep track on how much time has been spent during the day on
set up activities.
It is nifty, but I don't think it is useful for most people; and I
don't want the GNOME desktop to become a
So -1 for me, as I don't see any advantage in Project Hamster being
adopted as an official module of the GNOME desktop.
Being a module doesn't mean it's automatically shipped with the desktop by
default, does it? Don't the distros just pick what they want?
2008/7/28 Glenn J. Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So -1 for me, as I don't see any advantage in Project Hamster being
adopted as an official module of the GNOME desktop.
Being a module doesn't mean it's automatically shipped with the desktop by
default, does it? Don't the distros just pick what
Glenn J. Mason wrote:
So -1 for me, as I don't see any advantage in Project Hamster being
adopted as an official module of the GNOME desktop.
Being a module doesn't mean it's automatically shipped with the
desktop by default, does it? Don't the distros just pick what they want?
In general, I'd hate for this app is mostly useless to be a heavily
motivating reason for rejection, also... most of the apps we ship are
mostly useless to most of our users. This one is polished, cute and has
a sense of humour.
I agree with this -- I don't play half the games, but it's nice
Dave Neary wrote:
In general, I'd hate for this app is mostly useless to be a heavily
Well, I don't think it is useful for most people is not quite the
same. This is just that nobody I know is doing time tracking, so I
consider it a niche application.
motivating reason for rejection,
Hi,
Frederic Peters wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
In general, I'd hate for this app is mostly useless to be a heavily
Well, I don't think it is useful for most people is not quite the
same. This is just that nobody I know is doing time tracking, so I
consider it a niche application.
/me does
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
motivating reason for rejection, also... most of the apps we ship are
mostly useless to most of our users.
Do you think so ? It may be I almost perfectly matched GNOME apps
till today :)
Looking in Utilities: I rarely use
Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 18:36 +0200 schrieb Dave Neary:
Hi,
Frederic Peters wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
In general, I'd hate for this app is mostly useless to be a heavily
Well, I don't think it is useful for most people is not quite the
same. This is just that nobody I know is
As far as functionality don't overlap, I don't see much of a problem in
including more applications in GNOME. They just help it get promoted
further. If I take a glance at my menu under a standard Ubuntu
installation and I count the number of entries of a vanilla GNOME
installation, they're not
Homepage: http://projecthamster.wordpress.com/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://code.google.com/p/projecthamster/source/checkout
Proposal on d-d-l:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00138.html
License: GPLv3 (or is it GPLv3 or later?)
Short description:
==
Le lundi 28 juillet 2008, à 00:31 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Homepage: http://projecthamster.wordpress.com/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://code.google.com/p/projecthamster/source/checkout
Proposal on d-d-l:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00138.html
License: GPLv3
2008-07-28 klockan 00:31 skrev Vincent Untz:
+ not hosted in the GNOME infrastructure, but willing to migrate
Looks like the next to take action is not the maintainer:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545049
mvrgr, Wouter
--
:wq
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Homepage: http://projecthamster.wordpress.com/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://code.google.com/p/projecthamster/source/checkout
Proposal on d-d-l:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00138.html
35 matches
Mail list logo
