Il giorno gio, 09/06/2005 alle 13.08 -0400, Luis Villa ha scritto:
I think there seems to be a very strong consensus that ggv/gpdf should
be replaced by evince in 2.12. Does anyone object to me going ahead
and removing them from the jhbuild moduleset and adding evince?
Wait. There are some
Since everybody is talking about how glitz will eventually speedup
drawing operations by using hardware accelerated OpenGL, i built it
and then rebuilt cairo so cairo will detect glitz and compile with
support for it.
How does glitz further integrate into the desktop stack? Can i make
gtk+ use
On 6/9/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/05, Jon K Hellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:39 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
If we're talking about performance/stability in the context of
whether
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:21 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/9/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/05, Jon K Hellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:39 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
If we're talking about
On 6/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen this announced on gtk-devel or here, so:
http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/
Apparently this is a test tool to test gtk performance. Would be great
to have someone test 2.7 with it.
Went ahead and did it myself.
On 6/10/05, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:40 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen this announced on gtk-devel or here, so:
http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/
Apparently this is a test
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 15:12 +0200, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
Since everybody is talking about how glitz will eventually speedup
drawing operations by using hardware accelerated OpenGL, i built it
and then rebuilt cairo so cairo will detect glitz and compile with
support for it.
How does
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 14:47 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 19:00 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
- To be realistic, if GNOME-2.12 is released after GTK+-2.8,
most distributors are going to ship using them together.
So, the release team could decide to go with 2.6
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:47 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/05, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:40 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen this announced on gtk-devel or here, so:
[Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on this :)
On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton said:
I think the release team need to make a statement about what version of
DBus is to be used for any code which can
On 6/10/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 19:00 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
- To be realistic, if GNOME-2.12 is released after GTK+-2.8,
most distributors are going to ship using them together.
So, the release team could decide to go with 2.6 even with
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
[Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on this
:)
On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton said:
I think the release team need to make a statement about
On 6/10/05, John (J5) Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
[Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on
this :)
On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:33 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/05, John (J5) Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
[Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on
this :)
On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:21 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
But the last time we rushed out a gtk-gnome paired release, and got
ourselves locked into the new APIs so that we couldn't back out, the
result was that any distro actually paying attention would have
noticed that our 'latest stable set'
Hi Federico,
Last Wednesday at 21:02, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
It would be great if you could start a checklist in live.gnome.org of
particular APIs which are widely used and upon which people need to set
up things like gettext domains. I could certainly use this for the
Gnome
On 6/10/05, Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:21 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
But the last time we rushed out a gtk-gnome paired release, and got
ourselves locked into the new APIs so that we couldn't back out, the
result was that any distro actually paying
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
[Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on this
:)
On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton said:
I think the release team need to make a statement about
Seems to me that gnome-keyring-manager should at a minimum go into
meta-gnome-proposed in jhbuild*, and seems (to me) to fill a fairly
important need for key management, and should probably be in 2.12.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
For reference, it wasn't in 2.8 because of issues addressed
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 19:43 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
[Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on
this :)
On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton
On 6/10/05, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note that I think we should include evince in GNOME, replacing
gpdf and ggv. I'm only saying that maybe is better disable by now
poppler's cairo backend: this will produce sometimes a less sexy
rendering, but it's fast and with
Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/10/05, Kristian Hgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my testing hat on, I couldn't agree more. :) I assume you mean
make it the default in the next evince release? Or would you like
someone to add configure arguments to the jhbuild moduleset?
Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/05, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note that I think we should include evince in GNOME, replacing
gpdf and ggv. I'm only saying that maybe is better disable by now
poppler's cairo backend: this will produce sometimes a less sexy
rendering, but it's
On 10 Jun 2005 15:33:58 -0400, Jonathan Blandford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/10/05, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my testing hat on, I couldn't agree more. :) I assume you mean
make it the default in the next evince release? Or
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 13:10 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/05, Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:21 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
But the last time we rushed out a gtk-gnome paired release, and got
ourselves locked into the new APIs so that we couldn't back
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 19:43 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
As distribution packager, I already followed the DBUS 0.3x road once,
and it went dead because it seems only gnome and freedesktop are picking
up the new APIs. How will interoperability with other programs, like for
example, KDE look in
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 17:49 -0400, Morten Welinder wrote:
the problem with gtk+/cairo in a stable setting is that it has only
seen testing and been designed for hello world. You need to consider
something bigger!
Thanks for telling me how I designed the gtk+/cairo integration,
I had no idea.
Owen,
the problem with gtk+/cairo in a stable setting is that it has only
seen testing and been designed for hello world. You need to consider
something bigger!
Try putting 600-1000 pango layouts on the screen at once. GTK+ 2.6 is
already not very snappy with that. Then make sure your X
28 matches
Mail list logo
