Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Debarshi Ray
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 09:26:05PM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:04 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:24:00AM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > > 2. It's not possible to discontinue support for services X, Y, and Z from > > >

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Alberto Mardegan via desktop-devel-list
Hi, On 21/01/19 19:32, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > We have a rule though: the account types exposed in > gnome-online-accounts must be used by at least one core application. > It's a good rule because it doesn't make sense to have settings in > control-center for apps that aren't installed by

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:47 AM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto wrote: > * It was never my intention to make GNOME To Do a core app, and I was >glad to see it being dropped from the core set. For various reasons, >both technical- and design-wise, I believe To Do wasn't a good fit. Thank

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 00:00 Debarshi Ray, wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 09:26:05PM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:04 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:24:00AM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > 2. It's not

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 11:40, Debarshi Ray wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:13:26PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > Again, not a huge deal; sure, Documents is actually useful to navigate > > through the Google Drive contents???the Drive web UX has become > shockingly > > bad over the years,

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Debarshi Ray
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 05:14:39AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > This feels like an awfully aggressive way of asking for a reply in a > heated thread that's already getting close to 100 emails. I don't know > if replying will help but since you seem to want a reply so badly and > because I do want

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via desktop-devel-list
Since GNOME To Do is being constantly cited in this thread, I'd like to officially clarify a few things: * It was never my intention to make GNOME To Do a core app, and I was glad to see it being dropped from the core set. For various reasons, both technical- and design-wise, I believe To

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Debarshi Ray
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:33:09PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Bug trackers are an awful metric, with a clear and demonstrable bias. For an application that regularly released in an utterly broken state, a bug tracker is a decent indication. > Nevertheless, as I said: I don't *care* about

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:28 AM Debarshi Ray wrote: > The Todoist provider was always disabled by default. So unless a > distributor enabled it by default, I don't see how that can happen. That's an important point that I didn't notice before. Fedora and SUSE kept it disabled; Arch, Debian and

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Adrian Perez de Castro
Hello! On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:03:01 +0100 (CET), Adrien Plazas via desktop-devel-list wrote: > Le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 à 19:32, mcatanz...@gnome.org a écrit : > > > It's been a while, but IIRC I wanted a reading list mode to not be > > totally dependent on Pocket. We could sync it to Pocket

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread mcatanzaro
This is a tangent of a tangent, but: On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:29 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: Thank you for your reply. Ubuntu includes GNOME To Do by default in 18.04 LTS and still does. I guess we need to discuss whether it should be removed by default, but we try to limit the adding and

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Michael Gratton
On Mon, 28 Jan, 2019 at 9:27 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: A blog post was written and put out there because there was confusion/issues with 3rd party folks wanting to integrate with GOA. I'm not sure what more is required? Documenting it in the API docs or on the GOA wiki would have probably

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Michael Gratton
On Tue, 29 Jan, 2019 at 6:48 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: We'll be much more careful about adding apps in the future to ensure we have consensus and avoid backtracking on changes again. (I think Geary is still a very plausible candidate, though.) As mentioned a long time ago, I think I'd

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Debarshi Ray
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:13:26PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Again, not a huge deal; sure, Documents is actually useful to navigate > through the Google Drive contents???the Drive web UX has become shockingly > bad over the years, unsurprisingly since its a fate that befalls every > Google

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:26 AM Debarshi Ray wrote: > You already attempted to slander me once before in this thread: > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-January/msg00027.html > > It's been one week since I produced evidence against that: >