Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/782
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
would need a way to replicate the issue. or more information on how
you got into that.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Fabio Gomes dos Santos
wrote:
> Does the anyone know why the AddressSize shows a negative number on jmx?
>
> The queue as no message, but return this:
>
>
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/789
@hqstevenson are you getting notifications for these questions? either
here or dev-list
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user johnament commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/789
@clebertsuconic agreed. This does look like an awesome idea though for end
users trying to test with messaging systems.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/789
I guess this is intended for users to use on their tests?
What was the intention, to refactor Artemis' testsuite, or to provide rules
for users running their own tests?
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/789
I think it would also be good to have a clear explanation of why this
approach is superior to the approach already adopted in the test-suite.
Additional questions:
1.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787
just to let you guys know.. I ran the testsuite and only got a few known
failures. looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/789
This looks a great idea...
however.. there's no docs on how to use this. it would warrant a chapter on
the user-docs..
and maybe examples on how to run tests
GitHub user hqstevenson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/789
ARTEMIS-737 - added JUnit rules for Artemis servers and clients
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/784
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Does the anyone know why the AddressSize shows a negative number on jmx?
The queue as no message, but return this:
```NameValue TypeDisplay NameUpdate Interval Description
AddressSize -3636362longAddressSize -1 N/A
```
--
Fábio Santos
supergr...@gmail.com
Github user jbertram closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/741
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/783
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/785
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787
I am happy with this. +1 for merge...
Two small TODOS I would remove now.. but other than that good to merge...
Will let @mtaylor also to comment on this.
---
If
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787#discussion_r79924952
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/QueueConfig.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787#discussion_r79924920
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/QueueConfig.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/788
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/782
@mtaylor / @gemmellr This is now ready to merge...
(tagging you guys since you both commented on this PR before)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/788#discussion_r79900443
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/resources/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/bin/artemis
---
@@ -105,6 +105,16 @@ if [ -z
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/788#discussion_r79900532
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/resources/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/bin/artemis
---
@@ -105,6 +105,16 @@ if [ -z
Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/788#discussion_r79899679
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/resources/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/bin/artemis
---
@@ -105,6 +105,16 @@ if [ -z "$LOG_MANAGER" ] ;
Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/788#discussion_r79899253
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/resources/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/bin/artemis
---
@@ -105,6 +105,16 @@ if [ -z "$LOG_MANAGER" ] ;
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/788#discussion_r79898185
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/resources/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/bin/artemis
---
@@ -105,6 +105,16 @@ if [ -z
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/788#discussion_r79898051
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/resources/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/bin/artemis
---
@@ -105,6 +105,16 @@ if [ -z
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/788
ARTEMIS-732 loading wrong arch lib
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-732
We can make any required changes. I don't think it was really
intentional other than.. nobody extending it.. lets make it final ;)
Once you have a PR / diff whatever I will take a look.. I want to
make sure wildfly works.. I think Artemis should have as many Servers
as possible integrated.
If
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787#discussion_r79863944
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/impl/ActiveMQServerImpl.java
---
@@ -1290,10 +1291,7 @@ protected
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787#discussion_r79863285
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/QueueConfig.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787#discussion_r79860213
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/impl/ActiveMQServerImpl.java
---
@@ -1290,10 +1291,7 @@
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787#discussion_r79860068
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/QueueConfig.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/786
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Yes, I believe we have a mostly working RA in TomEE now. The main change
was something identified a while ago, the Resource Adapter class has to
have an interface and be non-final. We were able to get that working for
the most part in TomEE, where connection factories are injected from
artemis.
There's the artemis-ra where all the classes are.
That artemis-ra is just for the packaging for the ra.xml
Maybe we should move it somewhere else.
Did you guys get to any code changes required?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 6:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/787
ENTMQ-1844 Default the queue address to the queue name
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ENTMQ-1844
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user andytaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/786
ARTEMIS-742 = replication quorum broken
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-742
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user scop opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/785
Add missing @Overrides, flag as error in IDEs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/scop/activemq-artemis overrides
GitHub user scop opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/784
ARTEMIS-740 Auto-reload diverts from broker.xml
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/scop/activemq-artemis divert-reload
38 matches
Mail list logo