GitHub user bayern39 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/850
[ARTEMIS-802] Broker does not throw exception on divert with no name
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-802
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/835
ok, let me think about it. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/849
this commit would actually break stuff pretty badly.
Even .artemis-distribution/src/test/scripts/validate-spaces.sh would be
broken.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/849
@jbertram the failures showing at this build are real. I replicated the
same issues through a local build.
I would run the whole testsuite for such changes.
---
If your
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/849
ARTEMIS-805 old JMS clients failing on new broker
Old JMS clients are getting a CCE related to
SessionBindingQueryResponseMessage
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
sounds good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/847
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/848
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/835
The whole masking/hashing process still seems like a bit of a jumble to me.
To mask a password there's a raw Java command (e.g. "java -cp classPath>
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/848
ARTEMIS-804 log ref when no DLA configured
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-804
Github user graben commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
Have to fix a bug introduced by refactoring. I think inner classes are
looking better than an anonymous one. It might be better to add components to
ProtocolTrackerCallBackImpl too make it
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/847
@jmesnil, is this what you're looking for?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/847
ARTEMIS-808 use privileges to stop executor
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-808
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
@graben I understand it works now. I was just trying to be more generic on
the implementation and support future needs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user graben commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
A bit more this way? IMO I did not see why to change the method to
addDataSource. It could be only one and this one is a dependency which is
mandatory for broker startup.
---
If your
All,
I'm starting to look at the improvements around the addressing model
(ARTEMIS-780) there's going to be a fair amount of change involved that may
break certain parts of the broker (at least until it's fully completed).
For this reason, I've created a separate branch "ARTEMIS-780" to house
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839#discussion_r83920395
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/config/storage/FileStorageConfiguration.java
---
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839#discussion_r83920218
--- Diff:
artemis-server-osgi/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/osgi/ProtocolTrackerCallBack.java
---
@@ -25,4 +25,6 @@
Github user graben commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
Rebase is done :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
@graben can you rebase against master... and push -f at least?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
let me think about the class name...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user graben commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
Well, I think it must be the same callback to avoid the protocol tracker to
start the broker if the datasource is not bounded yet. It's just another
"mandatory" dependency. I might rename
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/839
@graben ^^^ (<<< just to send you a notification)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/846
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user jmesnil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/846
[ARTEMIS-803] Fix colocated backups with http-upgrade acceptor
* Do not offset ports for Netty connector/acceptor with http-upgrade
enabled.
* Pass the name of the ActiveMQ server
Github user barreiro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/548
Rebased
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user dudaerich commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/845
Hi @clebertsuconic
my intention here was to fix tests which fail in our CI. The path to
project directory contains '&' characters. Example of path:
```
27 matches
Mail list logo
