Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1789
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1781
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1786#discussion_r162492929
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/api/core/SimpleString.java
---
@@ -361,13 +371,68 @@ public int
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1781#discussion_r162491865
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/Create.java
---
@@ -557,6 +592,25 @@ public Object
Actually, I will keep this as is.. .the user should decide what driver to use...
I will keep configurations by default as derby (if the user doesn't
provide anything else on the CLI).. but that's just for easy of use.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic
thanks.. it's all good...
Actually I think not having the dependency on the main lib was a good
outcome anyways...
I could make a further change.. to programmatically download derby if
the user allows it.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Michael André Pearce
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1790
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1790
Looks like master is broken since merge of
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1742 thus your PR build failed,
this fix though looks fine, i have run it manually
Just for the record I gave an opinion in a discussion, I have not given a -1.
I’m not veto or blocking anything.
In actual fact as I said I’m for this I think it’s good.
just I think as a community we should have some clear guidelines agreed of what
goes in and what stays out, and how some
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1781#discussion_r162479786
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/Create.java
---
@@ -557,6 +592,25 @@ public Object
On 01/17/2018 03:50 PM, cmorgan wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Happy New Year.
I have a progress update about the NMS AMQP API Rework. The work done in the
fork, https://github.com/cjwmorgan-sol-sys/nms-amqp, is close to being
finished. Duane and I have also signed the ICLA. I will follow what Tim
Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1781#discussion_r162473338
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/Create.java
---
@@ -557,6 +592,25 @@ public Object
Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1781#discussion_r162473145
--- Diff:
artemis-core-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/api/config/ActiveMQDefaultConfiguration.java
---
@@ -423,8 +423,8 @@
Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1781#discussion_r162472842
--- Diff:
artemis-cli/src/main/resources/org/apache/activemq/artemis/cli/commands/etc/database-store.txt
---
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+
so, after my last update,
When you create a server with the --jdbc option
example:
./artemis create /tmp/myserver --jdbc
the CLI will still help the user to configure the server... but
instead of having the dependency ready, it will give you the following
message:
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1790
@michaelandrepearce The past PR has broken just this test: this is fixing
it :+1:
---
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1790
ARTEMIS-1606 - Change AddressInfo RoutingType Set to use EnumSet
This is fixing the broken testUnsupportedRoutingType test
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
I will remove the dependency to avoid confusion.
The database example will download the derby driver and install it on the
lib.
I will also add a message during the broker creation telling the user to
copy the driver in the right place.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:44 PM Timothy Bish
Agree with Robbie on this. My view from the previous discussion on the
Kafka bridge is that is would be a third party project that could be
used by anyone that wished to have it but that it does not need to be
(or should be) included with the broker either in the repo or the
distribution.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Arthur Naseef wrote:
> On the providing core persistence - that is core to Artemis, and Artemis
> provides a reasonable solution to that problem out-of-the-box. There are
> dozens, if not hundreds, or alternatives we could add as near-storage.
>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1742
---
If I'm understanding the discussion well enough (apologies, TLDR) - one
concern with adding this directly into core Artemis is ending up with too
much complexity baked into the main product. Also, Mixing Concerns (i.e.
reduced "separation of concerns").
Having a downstream project that
Clebert, I was looking for a +1 from Mike. My understanding is that a -1
from a committer (or is it just PMC?) is a veto [1], and I felt that was
Mike's position. I think your PR is a good one and I'd like to merge it
ASAP.
Anybody feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on the veto thing.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1742#discussion_r162421523
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/replication/SharedNothingReplicationTest.java
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1742
do you want to contribute more? I can help you in any way you need.
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1742
nice job on this one!!! impressed!!!
---
I can't speak for others on the previous thread, but the below was not
my position in that prior discussion at all. I don't think the
proposed kafka bridge component should be bundled in the broker repo
or distribution, regardless where else the code lives, but that it
should instead have its own
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1742#discussion_r162418130
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/replication/SharedNothingReplicationTest.java
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
> I don't see any contradictions or inequities here. I'd like to confirm a
> +1 from you before I merge. Let me know what you think.
I'm not sure if you asked a +1 from me or Michael.. but that's exactly
what I
> ...if I made the connector implementation code available in maven central
will have it hosted in GitHub the source, then we’d be happy to have that
packaged in to provide the functionality?
Obviously I can only speak for myself here, but that's how I understood the
previous discussion.
Justin
Ok so if I understood this if I made the connector implementation code
available in maven central will have it hosted in GitHub the source, then we’d
be happy to have that packaged in to provide the functionality?
If that’s the case im +1 with this, and then I’ll work on doing that for the
I just reviewed your PR, Clebert, and made a comment. In general I think
it looks great. Nice work.
I've been thinking about your concern, Michael, that the rules on
integrations like this aren't clear. I went back and reviewed the mailing
list discussion and the discussion on your PR for the
Github user cshannon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1789#discussion_r162393664
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/plugin/StompPluginTest.java
---
@@ -127,10
Github user cshannon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1789#discussion_r162392727
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/plugin/StompPluginTest.java
---
@@ -127,10
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1783#discussion_r162391229
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/transformer/ServerMessageImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1789#discussion_r162390676
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/plugin/StompPluginTest.java
---
@@ -127,10
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1789#discussion_r162390344
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/plugin/StompPluginTest.java
---
@@ -127,10
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1789#discussion_r162390192
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/plugin/StompPluginTest.java
---
@@ -127,10
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1783#discussion_r162389643
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/transformer/ServerMessageImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1781
I think it's worth clarifying the specific purpose of Derby in the
documentation. My understanding here is that Derby is being packaged for
demonstration purposes only and shouldn't be
GitHub user cshannon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1789
ARTEMIS-1619 - Add plugin support for address lifecyle
Adding callbacks to the plugin API for address creation, update and
removals
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1787
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1787#discussion_r162367328
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/postoffice/impl/PostOfficeImpl.java
---
@@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1787
+1 Iâm happy as noted I can pr some bits later
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1788
Nice work, @cshannon.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1788
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1771
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1787#discussion_r162358705
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/postoffice/impl/PostOfficeImpl.java
---
@@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1783
@jmesnil Made the changes you suggested. @clebertsuconic I agree with
@jmesnil that adding back the original types is the clearest and safest thing
to do, with the disadvantage of add
Github user mtaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1783#discussion_r162356443
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/transformer/ServerMessageImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+/*
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1787#discussion_r162353710
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/postoffice/impl/PostOfficeImpl.java
---
@@ -736,11 +736,11 @@
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1787#discussion_r162353815
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/postoffice/impl/PostOfficeImpl.java
---
@@ -736,11 +736,11 @@
Github user mtaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1775#discussion_r162352945
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/resources/schema/artemis-configuration.xsd ---
@@ -2790,6 +2790,14 @@
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1775
Sorry guys but I am -1 on this. I thought the idea of this was to behave
in a similar way to default-max-consumers, or default-purge-on-no-consumers. I
am not happy about overriding the
GitHub user cshannon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1788
ARTEMIS-1617 - Properly set autoCreated flag on address
Flag needs to be set when auto creating an address so that the address
can be removed later if auto delete is configured when
Github user stanlyDoge commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1775#discussion_r162343251
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/resources/schema/artemis-configuration.xsd ---
@@ -2790,6 +2790,14 @@
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1777
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1777
Great thanks, ill merge then.
---
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1777
These are the flamegraph of a couple of profiled tests, one on master:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13125299/35093335-7394c032-fc42-11e7-862e-936863f37eff.png)
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1777
@michaelandrepearce I'm running a test before and after, but first can you
try add ".jvmArgs("-XX:+UseG1GC")" and `.forks(2)` to your benchmark?
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1777
@franz1981 i was waiting on you, to give a thumbs up before i merged, is
that a thumbs up?
---
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1786#discussion_r162272711
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/api/core/SimpleString.java
---
@@ -361,13 +371,68 @@ public int hashCode()
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1786#discussion_r162272578
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/api/core/SimpleString.java
---
@@ -361,13 +371,68 @@ public int hashCode()
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1777
Very good results! A lil OT but seems that we really start need a JMH
folder with all the benchs on Artemis eh? :P
---
64 matches
Mail list logo