GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2154
ARTEMIS-1948 dotnet example with high performant load
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2153
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2153
Looks good to me BTW. Feel free to merge it yourself. Or I can do it in 2
hours.
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2153
I have been just git cherry picking and pushing it directly.
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2153
Yes, I think this would be suitable for 2.6.x. I'll send a PR.
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2153
nice one! now that we revert that other feature in 2.6.x.. isn't this
suitable for 2.6.x?
---
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
> with heart beats.. you won't this test.. as ping/pongs will disconnect
the client.
The idle-timeout stuff defaults to killing after 60 seconds, which the test
doesnt even
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2153
ARTEMIS-1947 return metadata in JSON session mgmnt ops
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
It's pointless to argue anyway.. it's just a test and it's working as
expected... I need to move to a different task ;)
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
with heart beats.. you won't this test.. as ping/pongs will disconnect the
client.
Disabling heart beats and still solving issues it's all that this fix was
about and the
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
Yes, after a connection-reset-by-peer error which meant the broker knew the
connection had gone, which it knew regardless of whether idle-timeout handling
was enabled or not, but failed
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
@gemmellr the issue i was dealing with was a .NET client in windows not
cleaning up after a disconnect, after I created the feature. So.. this is
definitely related. We can create
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
To me it seemed more about cleaning up the client regardless of
idle-timeout, and that it should do exactly the same if idle-timeout handling
is enabled or if it wasn't using AMQP at
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
@gemmellr that I disagree with.. this is about no heart beat.. and
disconnecting the client.
---
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
(I still don't think it should be in that class though per #2149
comments...but the test itself looks good now)
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
@gemmellr thanks.. I will merge it then
---
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
Looks good
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152#discussion_r196822722
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpNoHearbeatsTest.java
---
@@
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152#discussion_r196818582
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpNoHearbeatsTest.java
---
@@ -137,18
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2151
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2150
---
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2149#discussion_r196814636
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpNoHearbeatsTest.java
---
@@ -80,4 +88,68
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
@gemmellr / @mtaylor can you review this?
---
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2152
ARTEMIS-1924 small tweaks on HeartBeat test
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-artemis
As I said some links just weren't updated to reflect the newer
checksum distribution policy, but most were broken from pointing at
the wrong download area/server and using the query arguments that
aren't used there. That suggested the content was copied unchanged
from download.html into
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2149#discussion_r196726608
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpNoHearbeatsTest.java
---
@@ -80,4 +88,68
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2149#discussion_r196726336
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpNoHearbeatsTest.java
---
@@ -80,4 +88,68
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2149#discussion_r196726944
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpNoHearbeatsTest.java
---
@@ -80,4 +88,68
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2149#discussion_r196724509
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpNoHearbeatsTest.java
---
@@ -80,4 +88,68
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2151
Reproducing it is dependent by how the JIT will choose to optimize the
code, that's why there isn't any tests on it. I can try to build one, but
probably it will take seme time (to be
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2151
ARTEMIS-1945 InVMNodeManager shared state should be volatile
State access should be atomic to be visibile between
different threads.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2143
For anyone else wondering later, the other JIRA appears to be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1942
---
GitHub user vkamble60 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2150
[ARTEMIS-1944] Typo mistake in broker.xml at journal-buffer-timeout
explanation
jira :- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1944
You can merge this pull request into a Git
34 matches
Mail list logo
