that brings one subject to discuss...
2.6.1, 2.6.2 ... 2.6.x should all share the same documentation on
2.6.x... changes in doc on this branch should be only minor changes..
and any change here should be valid for any of the releases.
As of now.. i will just update the link to avoid an invalid
As Tim says it is still broken, I didn't change anything since my mail earlier.
On 12 July 2018 at 21:29, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 04:08 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>
>> @Robbie thanks for fixing it.. just came into it and realized you
>> already did it.. thanks
>
>
> Documentation
On 07/12/2018 04:08 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
@Robbie thanks for fixing it.. just came into it and realized you
already did it.. thanks
Documentation link for 2.6.1 on this page is still broken for me:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM,
as for previous docs.. I don't see a point to update the docs for
2.6.0 and 2.6.1.. as they are current..
we can add it when we move into 2.7.0... that's my plan at least.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> The 2.6.1 docs link at
>
@Robbie thanks for fixing it.. just came into it and realized you
already did it.. thanks
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> The 2.6.1 docs link at
> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html is broken. The
> link itself seems fine this time and the other 2.6.1
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2163
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2162
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2162
nice one @jbertram
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2166
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2166
@morefuntang are you sure you want your commit authored as 17103355
<17103...@cnsuning.com> ?
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2171
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2171
Thanks... I'm also adding a commit to improve the test you added. Take a
look please for future references. (I decided to just change it instead of
asking the change here).
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2176
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2182
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2182#discussion_r202102353
--- Diff:
artemis-jdbc-store/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jdbc/store/journal/JDBCJournalImpl.java
---
@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@
I will fix this in today's afternoon sorry about that.
(I have been away for 2 weeks and just getting back to work)
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> The 2.6.1 docs link at
> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html is broken. The
> link itself seems
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2179
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2181#discussion_r202058086
--- Diff:
artemis-jdbc-store/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jdbc/store/drivers/AbstractJDBCDriver.java
---
@@ -227,7 +227,11
The 2.6.1 docs link at
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html is broken. The
link itself seems fine this time and the other 2.6.1 links work, there
just dont seem to be any 2.6.1 docs.
The 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 releases aren't mentioned on
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2181#discussion_r202046654
--- Diff:
artemis-jdbc-store/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jdbc/store/drivers/AbstractJDBCDriver.java
---
@@ -227,7 +227,11 @@
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2181#discussion_r202041562
--- Diff:
artemis-jdbc-store/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jdbc/store/drivers/AbstractJDBCDriver.java
---
@@ -227,7 +227,11
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2181#discussion_r202040381
--- Diff:
artemis-jdbc-store/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jdbc/store/drivers/AbstractJDBCDriver.java
---
@@ -227,7 +227,11 @@
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2180
---
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2182
@clebertsuconic This one is purely gardening while I was fixing other
things on jdbc: if is fine I will left it here or I can close it too, if isn't
worthing a whole PR
---
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2182
ARTEMIS-1981 JDBCJournalImpl constructor isn't using tableName parameter
Removed the unused/redundant constructor parameter tableName
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2181#discussion_r202032181
--- Diff:
artemis-jdbc-store/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jdbc/store/drivers/AbstractJDBCDriver.java
---
@@ -227,7 +227,11
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2181
ARTEMIS-1980 Warn on failed check of table existence should be info
DB2 metadata checks should erroneously report stale table existence on
not existing/just deleted table, making
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2180
ARTEMIS-1979 Table names with DB2 should be upper-cases
DB2 JDBC driver fail to retrieve metadata information
if table names are lower-cases: similarly to Oracle, better
force
28 matches
Mail list logo
